Thank you for sharing your thoughts , <Susan freeman>

As I have posted here many times in the past - both Israeli and Palestinians should break/go beyond cycle of righteous anger . Righteous anger is not only poor counselor, it breeds new wrong/injustice in the present in order to get 'justice'/revenge etc for past sins/injustice .

And that is why posts of <johnlspouge> , <fsr> et al are so valuable , imo , and that is why I appreciate that you too shared your thoughts in solidarity with sane people/voices.

And I also agree with <fsr> , <johnlspouge> et al that every religion is blight - religion of <hamas> as well as religion of Israelis.

<keypusher> accused <al wazir> of writing stupid/edgy/provocative posts like a troll and yet here is what <kp> himself doing that apparently 😁

Point is : if you convince all Nigerians to adopt atheism as a mindless , thoughtless cult , dogma , that is as bad as following religion , perhaps.

Point is : religion is full of stupidity , absence of critical thinking , bigotry and such ....

Critical thinking, intelligence , kindness , morality , compassion and such often lead to atheism - if definition of atheism is broad enough and apparently definition of atheism provided by <fsr> is broad enough (some other time , I may request <fsr> to elaborate on his definition of atheism , if he pleases - presently , I am embarrassed of posting too much , almost flooding the forum ...so some other time , I will ask <fsr> , if he pleases)

So , the right question to ask is : if tomorrow , overwhelming majority of Nigerians all of a sudden experience extraordinarily vast expansion in critical thinking , intelligence , kindness , compassion , morality and such , would Nigeria all of a sudden become much , much , much nicer place.

I follow teachings of krishna/buddha/jesus et al , however , I do not follow any religion .

Religion tends to distort/pervert teachings of these great people.

Susan Freeman chessforum

What's the explanation for this??

Is non personal, non dual God same as 'nature ' ? Is ultimate/deepest reality 'nature ' ? Is non personal non dual God Absolute has self-awareness (humans , animals have self awareness , however , perhaps bacteria and other such have no self awareness even though they are alive )?

Is non personal , non dual god Absolute just a concept or there are proofs , at the level of experience , if not objective empirical then at least subjective empirical ? If those proofs are definitive , then personal God definitely does not exist , correct ?

Atheism is about belief , agnosticism is about knowledge . Atheists do not believe that there is some personal God that created the world and is now running affairs of world . Agnostic assert that they can not be certain whether personal God exists or not . So , a person can be both atheist and agnostic

Definition of atheism given by <FSR> (as I understood it) -< 'if you do not believe in the existence of a personal God that created the world and is now running the affairs of the world , then you are an atheist '>

According to this definition , I too am an atheist and I am fine with it - I like this definition .

At the same time , I am a spiritualist too .

So , I am both an atheist and spiritualist - and I like that.

I do not believe in personal God, so I am an atheist .

Hundreds and hundreds of pages have been randomly slashed to fragments. My emails of concern sent to you have been intercepted, kept from you. Who is responsible for this deliberate aberrant destruction ? ? It will only get worse.

"The greater the power, the more dangerous the abuse." - Edmund Burke

"If you want to find out what a man is to the bottom, give him power." - Robert Ingersoll

”But constant experience shows us that every man invested with power is apt to abuse it, and to carry his authority as far as it will go.” - Charles de Secondat

Hear , hear !

Respect to <ohiochessfan> .

I hope that this message would be spread widely .

Just want to say that I hate it when those who oppose Trump are not respectful to each other. And presently , I am happy to see that all those who oppose cheater , rapist Trump are in general respectful to each other. Disagreement is fine but mutual respect must be there .

I like it when <fsr> points out fallacy (not many fallacies go past him undetected ) in the posts of those who oppose Trump, however , in general he respectful

Except misogynist <the integrity> and his gang , everyone in this forum deserves respect ....thanks to <susan freeman> too for calling out the most misogynist post of the day recently .

Real men never demean women ...only soy boys and cucks demean women

Thank you for your posts , sane people .

Once again :

Trump is dangerous and he must be defeated in November...

In your monkey training how long does cursing at people usually take?

<Rdb:
Are there many such fu#@#@# buffons in america presently ?>

<al wazir > is not racist , homophobic, xenophobic, anti-immigrants - unlike <the integrity>

<al wazir> is honest , civil , respectful - unlike <the integrity>

Look at <Lloyd gross> - his outlook is almost exact replica of outlook of <the integrity> and i find that far, far , far right extremosm cringeworthy- and yet he is civil and respectful in general .

So , if dishonest , abusive , disrespectful <the integrity> , leader of <monkeys flinging feces> gang says that we turn blind eye to 'harmless/good pedophilia ' , 'harmless/good incest ' posts of <al wazir> , my answer is :

<no , I don't. However , I am civil and respectful to <al wazir> in this forum just as I am civil and respectful to <Lloyd gross> despite his cringeworthy far right extremism.

Liar <diceman> gotta lie. He did not have any answer when I exposed his lie in <Susan freeman> forum on Aug 31 , 2024. That post of mine still is last post in that forum and I had posted that post in rogoff forum too . Egg on the face of <diceman>

Now , <The integrity> claimed to lurking readers that he is capable of having civil conversation .

Does <diceman> have anything to say about that ? No ? I thought so .

Why had I saved that post in the forum of <Susan freeman> ?

Because I know <diceman> - he is the most dishonest , shameless, stupid , inveterate , incorrigible, hateful liar I have come across.

He has been lying about me for years - and most stupid , shameless lies at that. I knew he would tell lie again about me - a stupid lie

and to expose him when he does that again , I had saved that post in the forum of <Susan freeman> and now I am saving more posts there .

And also when he is exposed , he says <thank you for hate>, <thank you for sharing disease , mental disorder > and some such ...

He writes hateful , stupid lies and when he is exposed , he says <thank you for hate >

I grabbed him by the scruff of the neck and
smooshed his face in his potty mouth>

Wow ! What an alpha male <diceman> is .

Now any thought about you getting exposed as liar ?

I come up with great names. I’ve got a knack for it.>

If <sugardom> starts acting in a civil manner like <areknames> and <dempun> , would you be civil to him like you are civil to <areknames> and <dempun>>

< perfidious: <If that’s really Shaw, I think he’s a likeable, warm-hearted and generous guy.> Except if we are sitting across the table from one another.

There, I give and accept no quarter>

< SugarDom: < perfidious: <If that’s really Shaw, I think he’s a likeable, warm-hearted and generous guy.> Except if we are sitting across the table from one another. There, I give and accept no quarter.>

What can I say? I just refuse to judge someone who has a big pile of chips in front of him. 😂😂😂>

Sounds cool.

And that's it. Captain & devere, I'm sure you'll be more careful before flinging fraud accusations around in the future>

<SugarDom: <And that's it. Captain & devere, I'm sure you'll be more careful before flinging fraud accusations around in the future.> Fair enough. I move to strike my statement off the record>

Credit and respect to <sugardom> for this .

Point is - <perfidious> and <sugardom> had civil conversation yesterday . And it is possible that these two may continue having civil conversations the way <perfidious> and right wingers <areknames> , <dempun> have civil conversations.

It is just that <The integrity> , <optimal play> , <Keyser soze> , <diceman> do not want to have civil conversations .

And <The integrity> wants to distort usernames - he specifically said so .