Part 1
http://youtu.be/AGYULSB_vd4

Part 2
http://youtu.be/eIUV37lmOUQ

What a fascinating video, thank you-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ih5...

First, the cool voice of the introducer, and the track is simply outstanding.

It's "hybrid monkey" status is a happy bonus of course. I sense our <Brocho> will appreciate this vinyl. I'm going to pass it to him.

heh....

On the point you raised, I just saw this a second ago:

Here's some Johnny Guitar Watson:

Featuring the man behind the <International Chess Writers Association> from the Chess Awards feature article.

I hope you don't mind me approaching you with more general questions form time to time. Here is one:

<We should always be striving to present the facts and let the reader draw her own inferences.>

I've seen this more often lately in newer publications. Has this become standard now or is it up to the author, whether the anonymous reader is a <he> or <she>?

This guy here you mean? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nW8S...

I don't know what other people are thinking about this issue. Possibly there is a feminist practice of using "she" because there is no neutral pronoun for people and feminists got tired of "he" being the automatic default pronoun.

I do it for more personal reasons. I'm a "she" and I like to think of myself as the center of the universe, so it's more narcissism than feminism in my case. I also like doing it because it annoys some people. Sometimes I use "he" for a change, just to annoy myself.

Seriously though, I think nowadays it's up to the author which pronoun she wants to use in her work. There's no law against it, but I'm not sure if it's an official convention in some circles. It probably is but I'm out of academia for 7 years now, so I care less and less about what they think.

Thanks for the answer! Yes, I guess that's the Ted Nugent I was referring to, but no, I'm not exactly a fan. He was just a good example of someone, ahem, proposing more "traditional" gender roles. But I'm not really paying attention to him.

<BEIJING, Sept. 9 (Xinhua) -- People who post slanderous comments online in China will face up to three years in prison if their statements are widely reposted, according to a judicial interpretation issued on Monday.

The document, released by the Supreme People's Court(SPP) and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, stipulates that people will face charges of defamation if online rumors they create are visited by more than 5,000 Internet users or retweeted for more than 500 times.> http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/c...

Nobody has been prosecuted with these laws yet, though. That's the "Korean style."

"Official Korea" is very harsh.

"Unofficial Korea" is like Disneyland.

Example: My official status is E-2 Visa working resident, and as such I am subject to any and all laws of Korea. This means I'm not even allowed to post on the internet without first confirming my real identity with the government, who then issues me one user name (my real name) that I must use on every internet post, anywhere on the internet.

As part of Microsoft's monthly Patch Tuesday, the devices and services giant will be rolling out fourteen patches for various vulnerabilities. Four of those patches are for Windows 8 and three are for Windows RT. These security patches are part of September 2013's Patch Tuesday, which rolls out today.

Windows 8 will see one critical update affecting Internet Explorer 10 and three important updates dealing with Remote Code Execution and Elevation of Privileges.

Windows RT, on the other hand, will see the same critical update addressing Internet Explorer 10, along with two important updates.

The rest of the security patches affect Office 2007, Office 2010, and Office 2013. Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP both receive updates as well, along with Windows 7 and Windows Vista.