Thank you <petemcd85>

<fredthebear: The whistle was blown. It appears nothing happened.>When you blow the whistle, I review the post. If it violates any our guidelines, it will be deleted.

<fredthebear: Don't punish me again for reporting reality.>If your reality report violates any of the guidelines it will be deleted

<fredthebear: The more you coddle that fool> Refrain from calling people fools

<<May-03-23 Rdb: Luckily for <fsr> , <check it out> et al, their religious dogmatic interlocutors do not have brains to answer the refutation.

For me it is child's play to answer the childish refutations presented by <fsr> and <check it out > et al as they refute personal god of dogmatism. If I answer refutations , all these people would be left with is <we not able to comprehend , therefore ...>

<Daniel freeman> had once banned a member for 6 months after short bans did not help - name of the user who was banned for 6 months was <return of the king> , if I recall correctly , and he had a feud with <frogbert>

<fredthebear: It's time to change your diaper and go to bed Rudy. There will be plenty of time for your <daily rants> again tomorrow>

The guy is totally out of control . He mist be disciplined/banned.

I am sure you have a point even though it appears impossible to fathom

Please spell it out

<fredthebear: <<So , <Rbd> , why do you post personal attacks over and over ? I guess you just cannot help it like your buddy <Refuse> . Correct ?>>>

I seldom post personal attacks - sometimes I retaliate when I am attacked personally but that is rare.

You ? Is there any day when you posted but did not post personal attacks <fredthebear> ?

I tried to find but could not find any such day for you in recent history .

May be I am missing something .

Could you help me <fred> , about this search

Then you finish with foolish faces>

That is a personal attack. I am going to report.

That is a personal attack - the adjective <putz> is an insult

I am going to report.

I am going to report. I was banned for using the word <childish>.

What is good for gander is good for goose too. <thegoodanarchist> must be banned.

Ladies and gentleman , we have rules here and law abiding citizens like me who care for rules. It is not Vietnam.

<thegoodanarchist> and his high horse , both should be sent to penitentiary provided high horse can fit in penitentiary

So , Lord Krishna killed kans. Lord rama killed ravana

There was no hate in those killings , however. (Like you kill your pet dog/horse if they go mad . There is no hate in those killings. Love is still there)

Impersonal love of jesus - that is a state of being. Delta brain wave activity level.

In that state , you just can not hate, you are always full of love in that state . And yet you do whatever needs be done , even killing.

Now , of course , you can not expect people on internet to be at that level.

However , what admins/owner and others wish is that people not be quick to be offended and remain calm.

Just enjoy. Live and let live . Rogoffland or any other forum is not war zone. Disagree/criticize by all means - that is one of the highest democratic values and has to be encouraged/cherished.

However , try to be love all the time as much as possible. (Try to be love - not try to be loving. Love is state of being . It is about being not doing . Many people may have experienced this state of being from time to time , though it becomes permanent only when we reach level of krishna/jesus/buddha)

So, my apologies guys , if I was curt to you people at times.

<i am just a soul whose intentions are good

O Lord, please do not let me be misunderstood >

https://youtu.be/mfwN0X8YnWo

Is that prudish ? That is not prudish.

Cg deserves respect for that. Thank you cg

Respect women/humans.

Learn from the impersonal love of jesus.

Once again , I am reminded of one of my favorite quotes of one of my favorite mystics

<Q: What is the place of sex in love? M: Love is a state of being. Sex is energy. Love is wise, sex is blind. Once the true nature of love and sex is understood there will be no conflict or confusion. Q: There is so much sex without love.
M: Without love all is evil. Life itself without love is evil. Q: What can make me love?
M: You are love itself -- when you are not afraid.>

Much appreciated.

Regards.

Start here - the thread was cleaned up hiding the record of his violations, but I saved my post (which also was deleted):

<Speaking of gratuitous pot-shots...

<Perhaps Jen Psaki could get a crossover role doing two jobs again.>

<Don't watch Jen Psaki's skewed analysis on CNN>

Hiding behind the chessboard to take pot-shots at <Jen Psaki> takes a certain kind of courage, or lack thereof.>

Shaobin vs A Nadanian, 2006

Typical - for no reason whatsoever using the chess decoy to insert inflammatory political material into a thread, needlessly.

And then <CG> fails to monitor a repeat offender so the material is allowed to fester out in plainview.

Then when finally alerted, <CG> takes only half-measures to just delete the offending material without dealing with the source of the problem.

And let's point out the hypocrisy of the furry one - claiming that the week has been peaceful otherwise.

What's clear here is that the furry one is using chess as a foil, and will continue to do so unless foiled.

<CG> is allowing this, and encouraging it.

If you can't deal with the fundamental problem, I think it would be better to just stand down and allow the record to stand without distortion.

Your half-measures are failing, badly.

It must have been difficult to only allow those couple of "asides" during the course of the past week.

Morphy vs C Harris, 1859 (kibitz #5)

A dedicated biographer is asking for the correct date of a game, but the wording is such that <Sally> can crack an 8th grade level joke - citing today's date.

<Fred> joins in, and <Sally> continues jesting, only then adding something that might be considered useful:

<Paul somebody will see this jesting and happen along and give more information regarding the source "Brentano's Chess Monthly, vol.i n.10 (February 1882), p.525" However Brentano's may have it got it from a newspaper printed on Monday 21st November 1859 with the game being played on the 18th.>

But this isn't as help as it might seem - the Brentano ref is from the source tage, and there's only speculation about what newspaper on what date.

Anyways, <paulmorphy1969> asked a legit question about bio info, and wasn't asking for a comedy act.

I believe my now deleted mild rebuke was merited, and had parity on the level of satire, though <Missy>'s and <jnpope>'s posts were more "helpful".

Here's an example of the furry one going out of his way to provoke and target, hiding behind a coredump of Reinfeld books:

<Chess Books by Fred Reinfeld:

101 Chess Problems for Beginners (Wilshire, Hollywood, 1960)(ISBN 0879800178)
...
Why You Lose At Chess (Simon & Schustor, NY, 1956) Win at Chess (Dover, NY, 1958)(ISBN 0486418782)
Winning Chess: How to Perfect your Attacking Play Winning Chess for Beginners (Grosset, NY, 1959)
Winning Chess Openings (Hanover, Garden City, 1961)

504 Gateway Time-out

<"The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" NN NY Rdb4 no a zsfod z4 mod z free zanzibard z stoner went perd a. missy mister max black white red read book Petrovpeter paul mary susan chrisowen yep refused pe sally a sandwich soup Moscow London Ohio scree 17 Ross Railroad triangle timothy perhidiously patzer psycho samuel john luke robertson trump don biden hunter lion snake 'Nomen nominandum' a.k.a 'the name to be named'>>

Game Collection: NN Needs Fredthe... Reinfeld, Chernev, Horowitz,

You can see even Peter, Paul and Mary are named, as well as <Susan>.

This isn't the most rational of writings, but more like red flag stuff.

Still waiting...

There are several important scripts that have stopped working two years ago or something. It has been reported several times but as usual nothing has been done about it.

Other problem (maybe related): Pia Cramling

<Rdb:> You're not one to cause many problems. Thanks for being honest and humble