|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 552 OF 914 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Jan-24-14 | | Jim Bartle: Oh, Jesus, warn a guy before posting something like that. |
|
Jan-24-14
 | | WannaBe: I did, <I wouln't be caught...> =) |
|
| Jan-24-14 | | Jim Bartle: You think that would hold up in court if some guy sues you for causing his blindness? |
|
Jan-24-14
 | | tpstar: Magnus Carlsen has reinvented the Norwegian fashion scene. Curling - huh huh, uh huh huh |
|
Jan-25-14
 | | perfidious: Verlander may miss season opener:
http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/eye-on... Only hope this is not so: Verlander is one terrific pitcher and a class act. |
|
Jan-25-14
 | | Phony Benoni: <perfidious> Reports in these parts have been more optimisitc, but that may be wishful thinking with a core injury. Worse yet, Verlander is traditionally a slow starter. There are a lot of indicatons that this is not going to be a good year for the Tigers. |
|
Jan-26-14
 | | perfidious: <PB> If this prognosticator has things in order, your pessimism regarding the Tigers' prospects may not be justified: http://claydavenport.com/?p=207
Not sure what to make of some of Davenport's projections, though. |
|
Jan-26-14
 | | WannaBe: Does this mean he won't give "110%"?
http://espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/201... |
|
Jan-26-14
 | | Phony Benoni: <perfidious> I remain pessimistic simply because there are so many unanwered questions. Hole in the starting rotation (the team's main strength), bullpen losing two reliable relievers, Prince Fielder being replaced by an unproven rookie, other question marks not adequately addressed, rookie manager. There's just so many things that can go wrong. Hopefully, this is just the Polar Vortex talking. |
|
Jan-28-14
 | | Phony Benoni: For myself, I keep hearing the tune "Dueling Tubas": http://newsfeed.time.com/2014/01/27... |
|
Jan-28-14
 | | WannaBe: So, how long have you been a black quarterback -- Asked to Doug Williams of Washington Redskins http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-s... |
|
| Jan-28-14 | | Travis Bickle: Hey Phony, it's Official! It's USMC Marine weather in Chicago now!! I went out to feed my birds and almost lost a finger from the frigid frozen tundra that was my backyard... P.S. If it remains this cold I'm going to have to start wearing underwear & socks!! ; P You're pal, Travis
Semper Fi!! Hoo' Rah!!! |
|
Jan-28-14
 | | Phony Benoni: <Travis> I am tempted to purchase a firearm, stand over the nearest groundhog burrow on February 2nd, and inform the little critter that it doesn't see its shadow after all. Though we'll be in the middle of a heat wave by then. Four straight days above 20! By the way, with Groundhog Day doubling as Super Bowl Sunday, I wonder what the Vegas line is on the meaning of the groundhog's prediciton. Denver probably has more sunshine than Seattle, so seeing the shadow should probably favor them. |
|
Jan-28-14
 | | Phony Benoni: There have been only eight Super Bowls played after the groundhog's appearance, and there doesn't seem to be a clear trend. Shadow: NFC 3, AFC 2
No Shadow: AFC 2, NFC 1
Too small a sample size to draw legitimate conclusions. Also, the individual factors are contradictory. Seattle's loss was on a Shadow day, so they should favor No Shadow. Peyton Manning's two appearance were a win on a No Shadow and a loss on a Shadow, so he would seem to favor No Shadow as well. You'd expect Phil to give his best for a Steelers' game. They've won on a Shadwo and lost on a No Shadow, so that would seem to mean the AFC favors No Shadow. Here's the data. See if you can make any sense of it. 2005 Patriots 24, Eagles 21 AFC Shadow
2006 Steelers 21, Seahaws 10 AFC Shadow
2007 Colts 29, Bears 17 AFC No Shadow
2008 Giants 17, Patriors 14 NFC Shadow
2009 (played February 1) Shadow
2010 Saints 31, Colts 17 NFC Shadow
2011 Packers 31, Steelers 25 NFC No Shadow
2012 Giants 21, Patriots 17 NFC Shadow
2013 Ravens 34, 49ers 31 AFC No Shadow |
|
Jan-28-14
 | | WannaBe: From G. Easterbrook:
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/1... <In fashion news, the Broncos are the home team of record for the Super Bowl. The only significance is the home team of record chooses whether to wear colors or whites. Denver chose to wear orange. Denver has worn orange jerseys in the Super Bowl three times, and lost all three. The Broncos won the Super Bowl the time they wore blue, and are 1-1 in their whites. Surely Broncos execs choosing jerseys for New Jersey thought, "Superstition is ridiculous." Woe unto disbelievers!Want to impress your friends while watching the game? If either the Broncos or Seahawks score on a pick-six, immediately announce they will win. Teams returning an interception for a touchdown are 11-0 in the Super Bowl. And see below for TMQ's Super Bowl pick.> And this:
<Stats to Ponder No. 5: If the Broncos prevail, they will be the second team to lead the NFL in passing yards and also win that season's Super Bowl. So far only the 1999 Rams finished first in passing and also won the Super Bowl. If the Seahawks prevail, their 26th rank in the NFL in passing yards will be the lowest ever for a Super Bowl champion. So far the 2005 Steelers, at 24th, are the worst team for passing yards to win the Super Bowl. Stat from reader Jeff Caveney of New York.> If memory serves, the Rams almost lost that one, if not for a last minute Championship saving tackle... Defence will prevail?!!? |
|
| Jan-28-14 | | Travis Bickle: Hey Phony, The 1967 "Ice Bowl" in Wisconsin Dec. 31st, what fond memories! The Temperature was -13 degrees below zero with a wind chill of -48 below zero! I hope Sunday's game is just like this 1 was! ; P http://youtu.be/-9TL1TC68GU |
|
| Jan-28-14 | | Jim Bartle: Whoa!! Who produced that video, the Green Bay PR department? I noticed that even on the power plays, GB's wide receivers were still on the line. You'd never see that today. |
|
Jan-28-14
 | | Phony Benoni: So that's why Green Bay won. On the ice, it's a big advantage to have a power play. |
|
| Jan-28-14 | | Jim Bartle: I'd forgotten that Hornung and Taylor had been replaced by the young bonus babies Anderson and Grabowski by the time of that game. |
|
Jan-29-14
 | | WannaBe: No walking, no talking, no lookin', no nuthin'!!! Welcome to the No Fun League. http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-s... |
|
Jan-29-14
 | | WannaBe: 40 pages of Super Bowl Props!!!
http://www.vegasinsider.com/visport... |
|
Jan-29-14
 | | Phony Benoni: What was the Over/Under? |
|
Jan-29-14
 | | WannaBe: Which half? What quarter? What game? |
|
Jan-29-14
 | | Phony Benoni: I mean, what was the Over/Under for the number of pages of Props? |
|
| Jan-30-14 | | Shams: My SB prediction: Kenneth Rogoff Go hawks. |
|
 |
 |
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 552 OF 914 ·
Later Kibitzing> |