chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Robert James Fischer vs Boris Spassky
"The Matrix Ruy Loaded" (game of the day Sep-07-2010)
Fischer - Spassky World Championship Match (1972), Reykjavik ISL, rd 10, Aug-03
Spanish Game: Morphy Defense. Breyer Defense Zaitsev Hybrid (C95)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 60 times; par: 74 [what's this?]

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 55 more Fischer/Spassky games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 11 OF 11 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-23-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Petrosianic: For example, 23...axb5 24. Rxb5, and Black is in no serious trouble, and a probable draw is on the horizon. It looks as though the exchange sacrifice is done with an eye to trying to win.

On the other hand, Black isn't in trouble for a long time after the exchange sac either.

Apr-23-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Everett: <perfidious> all those Magyars have barbarian strength from their time on the steppes, not a bourgeois among 'em.>

Y'all best not mess with 'em!!

Apr-24-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp:


click for larger view

Is anything wrong with 33.Nh6+?

Apr-24-15  Zonszein: Hello
Perhaps Mr Fischer did not want to give Spassky the possibiity of playing the bishop to g7 in some variations (?)
Apr-24-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: <offramp:

Is anything wrong with 33.Nh6+?>

...without a machine it looks ok.

Id guess Fischer wanted to get the rook on the seventh, behind black's knight pawn with check.

...besides, in game 3 Fischer showed black could get an advantage with busted kingside pawns from a knight on the rim. :)

Apr-24-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <diceman>, thanks. I see it now that you point it out. Because the king is on f7 in the game, the white rook gets to the seventh with a gain of tempo. That has been on my mind for some time!
Jun-08-15  A.T PhoneHome: I find it beautiful to see the ending of the game, after 47.Rexb4.

Those b-file Rooks have a starring role; being a piece up, Fischer seals the deal!

Aug-03-15  Howard: Fischer: His Approach to Chess, states that instead of Fischer's sharp 26.Bb3, he should have reversed the moves by playing 26.Qf4, and THEN Bb3.

Comments ?!

Aug-03-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: <Howard: Fischer: His Approach to Chess, states that instead of Fischer's sharp 26.Bb3, he should have reversed the moves by playing 26.Qf4, and THEN Bb3. Comments ?!>

...with either move black's best seems to be a6xb5.

...so it would probably just transpose into the game.

Oct-03-15  slater369: 32...Bxe4???
Oct-03-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <slater369: 32...Bxe4???>

Are you saying 32....Bxe4 is a blunder? It isn't. It's not even a mistake. If 32....Kxf7 then 33.Rd7+ wins the bishop. So Spassky decides to grab a pawn with it first.

<leka: My the old 32mgz computer elo rating 2255 played 25 second thinking time better than the poor Spassky this Ruy Lopez Breyer.Spassky played this game about 2000 elo ratinhg level.The poor Spassky!!>

Where do people get this stuff?

Apr-12-16  Party Animal: The Maestro of The Ruy plays a beautiful endgame!
Apr-12-16  Howard: About where was the point of no return, as far as Spassky throwing away the draw for good ?
May-18-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: <Howard: About where was the point of no return, as far as Spassky throwing away the draw for good ?>

Consensus seems to be that 29... Re7 was the losing move, and that 29... Rad8 would have held.

Fischer vs Spassky, 1972 (kibitz #69)

May-18-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Petrosianic: <Party Animal: The Maestro of The Ruy plays a beautiful endgame!>

Every game should have one comments section for comments, and another one for gushing, just to keep them separate.

May-18-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Petrosianic: <29... Rad8 would have held.>

Well, "would have held" is a bit optimistic. The game probably would have continued on an even keel, but it's too early to talk about a final result.

May-18-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Petrosianic: Now, if the line did play out <exactly> as zzyw told it (not a sure thing), this resulting position is probably drawn, just because the single Rook can't hold the pawns alone, and White can't attack the Black Kingside without his King's participation.

The main difference between this and the game line, is that Black gets to swap a pair of Rooks, and the passed pawns are less dangerous as long as White has two Rooks.


click for larger view

May-18-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: <Petrosianic:

<Party Animal: The Maestro of The Ruy plays a beautiful endgame!>

Every game should have one comments section for comments, and another one for gushing, just to keep them separate.>

...and one for hate, so <Petrosianic:> can feel at home.

The nerve!
Calling Fischer's play <beautiful>.

Sep-01-16  Howard: It appears that the 35th move was Spassky's fatal blunder, correct?
May-03-17  Helios727: If 56... Bxf6 would White trade Rooks with 57. Rd1+ ?
May-03-17  beatgiant: <Helios727> White would trade rook for <rook and pawn> with 56...Bxf6 57. Rd1+ Kc4 <58. Rxc5+> Kxc5 59. Rxd7.
Oct-31-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  ajk68: <Howard: It appears that the 35th move was Spassky's fatal blunder, correct?>

Probably not. Stockfish 9 has the following line.

1) +0.12 (41 ply) 35...Ra1+ 36.Kh2 Bd6+ 37.g3 b4 38.Rb6 Kf5 39.Rh4 Rd1 40.Kg2 h6 41.Kf3 Ke6 42.Rg4 g5 43.h4 Rd3+ 44.Ke2 Rd5 45.hxg5 Kf5 46.Rh4 hxg5 47.Rc4 Ke6 48.g4 Re5+ 49.Kd3 Rd5+ 50.Kc2 Re5 51.Kb3 Rd5 52.f3 Kd7 53.Rb7+ Kc6 54.Rbxb4 Rd3+ 55.Kc2 Rxf3 56.Rb3 Rf2+ 57.Kd1 Ra2 58.Rf3 Bf4 59.Rfc3 Bd6 60.Rb3 Be5 61.Rb1 Ra3 62.Rc2

Oct-31-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  ajk68: 40...Kf7 looks like the losing blunder.
Nov-01-17  RookFile: I'd replace the word "blunder" with "error". A blunder is when you hang your queen. It's probably something other than a mistake uncovered by painstaking computer analysis 45 years after the fact.
Nov-01-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: 22.Bxf6 preserves the important diagonal-blocking e4 pawn.

26.Bb3 drops the b5 pawn but starts a brutal campaign on black’s f7 weak point.

45…Be5 allows 46.Rb5 and black’s Q side crumbles due to a nasty pin on an overloaded R.

54.Rxg5 it’s all over.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 11)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 11 OF 11 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
estrategias 2 de suetin
by LESTRADAR
The Gambiteer
by Ron
HeMateMe: Only 7 pages for one of the decisive games of 1972
from They were surprised by Calli
Robert J. Fischer Collection [White]
by MichaelMichael
Chess Informant Best Games 1
by Olanovich
2R vs. R+B. Not one but two tactical ambushes.
from EG Rook Plus Endgames by fredthebear
World Championship Game #10
from Road to the Championship - Bobby Fischer by Fischer of Men
Ruy Lopez
from werdnabd's favorite games by werdnabd
Kasparov & Karpov learn the Spanish Breyer: 26 Bb3!
from chess strategems iv - under construction by gauer
Game 10
from Fischer World Champion (Timman/Euwe) by Qindarka
MKD's Favourite Games
by MKD
Game 117
from Russians versus Fischer by Anatoly21
Game 10, Fischer leads 6 1/2-3 1/2
from 1972 World Chess Championship by Penguincw
2R vs. R+B. Not one but two tactical ambushes.
from Bobby Fischer's Best Endgames. by Nasruddin Hodja
RL50
from ANIL RAJ.R's KING PAWN GAMES by ANIL RAJ.R
tedster's favorite games 3
by tedster
Game 90
from Miroslav Filip - All World Is Learning From Them by Honza Cervenka
#10 fischer wins in a massacre
from fischer-spassky by kevin86
the historic 6th match game
from brilliacies by knight openings
10 Game 10
from Spassky - Fischer 1972 by ProfessorPete
plus 94 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC