chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing


register now - it's free!
Robert James Fischer vs Boris Spassky
"The Matrix Ruy Loaded" (game of the day Sep-07-10)
Fischer - Spassky World Championship Match (1972)  ·  Spanish Game: Morphy Defense. Breyer Defense Zaitsev Hybrid (C95)  ·  1-0
To move:
Last move:

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 58 times; par: 76 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 55 more Fischer/Spassky games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) either press F or click on the e7 square.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 11 OF 11 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-24-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  nimh: 1) why so? Being familiar with games of players of the past is a natural part of chess education. The point is to measure actual ability, not inborn talent.

2) ?? what are you trying to say? But if you're saying that it's more difficult to play accurately after a brilliancy by the oponent, you may have a point.

3) Indeed, if you take a ruler and try to measure the length of a line you just drew on the paper with a pencil, you probably notice they are of completely different material, shape and purpose. :) But it nevertheless does its job, doesn't it?

4) There are objective reasons behind either type of rating inflation. Hence it must be considered as an inevitable and natural phenomenon in rating systems.

Intelligence has risen and that has nothing to do with playing strength. Why contrary?

Einsten may have been the most naturally talented scientist ever, but Don't you think physics has evolved a lot since his death? Someone with Einstein's knowledge and ability would be quite unnoticeable and unknown today.

Sep-18-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Travis Bickle: 56. Rb1 Coup de grāce...
Mar-24-15  Paraconti: A beautiful win.
Mar-24-15  Howard: Timman's book Art of Chess Analysis analyzes this game in depth. So does Kasparov's MGP.
Apr-23-15  Petrosianic: I had a discussion about this game with someone a while ago. The other person claimed that Black "blundered" the exchange, I felt that he deliberately sacrificed it for those two passed queenside pawns. What's the general consensus?
Apr-23-15  ToTheDeath: It was a deliberate sacrifice. Spassky thought he could hold but Fischer's technique was just too good. Of all the world champions Spassky was the least shy about giving up material "on spec".
Apr-23-15  Petrosianic: Was he trying to hold, or trying to rustle up winning chances? It seems like he could have had a reasonable position without the sac.
Apr-23-15  Petrosianic: For example, 23...axb5 24. Rxb5, and Black is in no serious trouble, and a probable draw is on the horizon. It looks as though the exchange sacrifice is done with an eye to trying to win.

On the other hand, Black isn't in trouble for a long time after the exchange sac either.

Apr-23-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Everett: <perfidious> all those Magyars have barbarian strength from their time on the steppes, not a bourgeois among 'em.>

Y'all best not mess with 'em!!

Apr-24-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp:


click for larger view

Is anything wrong with 33.Nh6+?

Apr-24-15  Zonszein: Hello
Perhaps Mr Fischer did not want to give Spassky the possibiity of playing the bishop to g7 in some variations (?)
Apr-24-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: <offramp:

Is anything wrong with 33.Nh6+?>

...without a machine it looks ok.

Id guess Fischer wanted to get the rook on the seventh, behind black's knight pawn with check.

...besides, in game 3 Fischer showed black could get an advantage with busted kingside pawns from a knight on the rim. :)

Apr-24-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <diceman>, thanks. I see it now that you point it out. Because the king is on f7 in the game, the white rook gets to the seventh with a gain of tempo. That has been on my mind for some time!
Jun-08-15  A.T PhoneHome: I find it beautiful to see the ending of the game, after 47.Rexb4.

Those b-file Rooks have a starring role; being a piece up, Fischer seals the deal!

Aug-03-15  Howard: Fischer: His Approach to Chess, states that instead of Fischer's sharp 26.Bb3, he should have reversed the moves by playing 26.Qf4, and THEN Bb3.

Comments ?!

Aug-03-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: <Howard: Fischer: His Approach to Chess, states that instead of Fischer's sharp 26.Bb3, he should have reversed the moves by playing 26.Qf4, and THEN Bb3. Comments ?!>

...with either move black's best seems to be a6xb5.

...so it would probably just transpose into the game.

Oct-03-15  slater369: 32...Bxe4???
Oct-03-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <slater369: 32...Bxe4???>

Are you saying 32....Bxe4 is a blunder? It isn't. It's not even a mistake. If 32....Kxf7 then 33.Rd7+ wins the bishop. So Spassky decides to grab a pawn with it first.

<leka: My the old 32mgz computer elo rating 2255 played 25 second thinking time better than the poor Spassky this Ruy Lopez Breyer.Spassky played this game about 2000 elo ratinhg level.The poor Spassky!!>

Where do people get this stuff?

Apr-12-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Party Animal: The Maestro of The Ruy plays a beautiful endgame!
Apr-12-16  Howard: About where was the point of no return, as far as Spassky throwing away the draw for good ?
May-18-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: <Howard: About where was the point of no return, as far as Spassky throwing away the draw for good ?>

Consensus seems to be that 29... Re7 was the losing move, and that 29... Rad8 would have held.

Fischer vs Spassky, 1972 (kibitz #69)

May-18-16  Petrosianic: <Party Animal: The Maestro of The Ruy plays a beautiful endgame!>

Every game should have one comments section for comments, and another one for gushing, just to keep them separate.

May-18-16  Petrosianic: <29... Rad8 would have held.>

Well, "would have held" is a bit optimistic. The game probably would have continued on an even keel, but it's too early to talk about a final result.

May-18-16  Petrosianic: Now, if the line did play out <exactly> as zzyw told it (not a sure thing), this resulting position is probably drawn, just because the single Rook can't hold the pawns alone, and White can't attack the Black Kingside without his King's participation.

The main difference between this and the game line, is that Black gets to swap a pair of Rooks, and the passed pawns are less dangerous as long as White has two Rooks.


click for larger view

May-18-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: <Petrosianic:

<Party Animal: The Maestro of The Ruy plays a beautiful endgame!>

Every game should have one comments section for comments, and another one for gushing, just to keep them separate.>

...and one for hate, so <Petrosianic:> can feel at home.

The nerve!
Calling Fischer's play <beautiful>.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 11)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 11 OF 11 ·  Later Kibitzing>

Now on DVD
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Shows how great they both are....but Bobby is better! Great gam
from peterpatzer's favorite games by peterpatzer
Fisher v. Spassky 1972
by rwvatsc
Decisive World Championship Games II
by FaradayBach
World Championship Game #10
from Road to the Championship - Bobby Fischer by Fischer of Men
My favorite games from WCC matches
by skytzo985
2R vs. R+B. Not one but two tactical ambushes.
from Bobby Fischer's Best Endgames. by Nasruddin Hodja
jjus5's favorite games
by jjus5
Game 104
from On My Great Predecessors 4 (Kasparov) by Qindarka
the historic 6th match game
from brilliacies by knight openings
The Gambiteer
by Ron
estrategias 2 de suetin
by LESTRADAR
Game 90
from Miroslav Filip - All World Is Learning From Them by Honza Cervenka
Fischer vs the World Champions Decisive Games
by visayanbraindoctor
Fischer's Spanish Dance
from M.D. Wilson's favorite games by M.D. Wilson
Power Chess - Fischer
by Anatoly21
RL50
from ANIL RAJ.R's KING PAWN GAMES by ANIL RAJ.R
76 par 71 teska i mnogo gresaka u sedisnjici
from GTM Ruy by kafkafan
!
from fischer best games by brager
Brooklyn Bobby
by chocobonbon
Game 32
from Chess Informant Best Games 101-200 by Qindarka
plus 72 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2016, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies