chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Robert James Fischer vs Mikhail Tal
Portoroz Interzonal (1958), Portoroz SLO, rd 12, Aug-23
Spanish Game: Closed Variations. Keres Defense (C92)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 12 more Fischer/Tal games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The tournament is found above the game. For the newest chess events, this information may be a link which takes you to the tournament page which includes other games, a crosstable, discussion, etc.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-07-04  Whitehat1963: Why not 39. Re7?
Jan-08-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: <whitehat1963> I think that if 39.Rae7 then 39...a3 is embarassing. If the other R moves to e7 then the two passed pawns are equally dangerous after swapping off a pair of R's. White is worse if he does not go for the repetition.
Jan-08-04  clifton: I thought Tal would win this one for sure.
Mar-03-05  jerry417: Iam studing Tal and fishers openings
Jun-28-05  lentil: doesn't 21. ..cb simply win a P?
Jun-28-05  Kangaroo: <<lentil>: doesn't 21...cb simply win a P?>

No, try to imagine what would happen after <22. Nf5> followed by <23. Qg4> threatening <24. Qxg7#> or <24. Nh6+> winning the queen

Jun-27-06  spirit: nice ending
Apr-09-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: In Wade's collection of Fischer's games, Leonard Barden cites subsequent analysis claiming a win for White with 35.Bh6 Re8 36.Bg7 Ne6 37.Bxf6, leaving Black defenceless to R6d7, Rxh7 and Rh8 mate.
May-23-07  Owl: Why doesn't Tal take the rook after 39.Rhg7+ 39...Nxg7 40.Rxa8+ and there is no way Fischer can stop those two passed black pawns.
May-23-07  newton296: Owl. I don't get that either . After nxr rxr+ it looks like a win for tal? just push the q side pawns!
Jul-28-07  talisman: 1st encounter....what would the world pay, at ant given point in time, to see a tal-fischer, 24 game championship match.
Sep-16-07  cn1ght: I'm not going to calculate it out because it'd be complicated with many variations and all, but it looks like the pawns cannot push. The bishop covers the pushing squares, the knight is too far away, the king is also far away, and white's rook is behind the pawns, where it should be, not infront like black's rook.
Sep-16-07  smarterthanbobby: you know these are two of the greatest minds chess had to offer at the time... I am sure they had a million reasons why they drew... each making a conclusion based on some exact reason... to any who posted why draw! black I feel looks to be in a tricky dilema, fisher was an end game artist... black only had 1 chance, promote or die and for fisher to break even on whites trade off's was more than a coin toss... leaving a lop sided king - pawn match up I feel tal was lucky fisher agreed to the draw.
( they are both great! ) would be nice to know 100% the conclusion to this puzzle... but who is at fishers level? wonder what THE BIG K, THINKS ABOUT this maze? anyone know is karsopov made thoughts on who would come out on top in this game? I would trust his thoughts!
Jan-02-08  Willem1984: And 27...,g5? Makes the bishop looks silly
Jul-13-08  firefly3: 27... g5 isn't that good. First of all it can be met soundly with 28. h4, necessitating 28... gxh4.

It could also be met with the sharper 28. Rd3. Then you could have

28. Rd3 Kf7 29. Rad1 Kg6 30. Rxd7 Rxd7 31. Rxd7 Kxh6 32. Rd6 or even 30. Bf8 Rxf8 31. Rxd7.

or

28. Rd3 Nb6 29. Rad1 Rxd3 30. Rxd3 Kf7 31. h4 Kg6 32. hxg5 fxg5 33. Rd6+

This is just a cursory analysis though. So my two responses after 27... g5 are the safer 28. h4 and the sharper 28. Rd3

Jul-13-08  RookFile: Yes, this is nothing at all like Fischer's famous ...Bxh2 against Spassky. The bishop gets out easy enough against ...g5.
Feb-16-09  WhiteRook48: why not 39...Nxg7?
Oct-18-09  WhiteRook48: 26...g5 27 g3 Kf7 28 h4 Kg6 29 hxg5 hxg5 30 Rd6+ Nf6 31 Rad1!!
Jan-01-11  keithbc: strange that we now accept that computers are so strong and, at least, give an unbiases evaluation of any position, but i recall reading at least from two sources that Tal was quoted as saying that he was sure he should have been mated in this game?!? Nothing here to suggest that. Perhaps psychology (Tal would use this to his own end) to make Fischer feel that he 'only' drew this game. In fact, at the end (if Tal wants to play Nxh7) it is only he that has any winning chances. Strange.
Jan-01-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <Owl: Why doesn't Tal take the rook after 39.Rhg7+ 39...Nxg7 40.Rxa8+ and there is no way Fischer can stop those two passed black pawns.>

41. Bc5 seems simple enough

Feb-17-11  Kallahad: Donīt be so cocky. Itīs not simple enough...according to Houdini 1.5 black was ahead about 0.30 centipawns...bc5 would make things even worst for white... in fact, our beloved fischer was not with the advantage. Well, not a simple position as said, the draw was fair.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Fischer vs Tal
from foxmt's favorite games by foxmt
Bjelica_125
by Gottschalk
Interzonal, Portoroz 1958
from Fischer vs The Russians by wanabe2000
Interzonal Tournament Game #12
from Road to the Championship - Mik Tal by Fischer of Men
Game 3
from Russians versus Fischer by Anatoly21
Game collection: TAL
by chessdeviant
137
from Chess in the USA 1945-72, Part 1 (Leach) by Chessdreamer
Interzonals 1958: Portoroz
by capybara
Fischer vs Tal
by foxmt
Game collection: TAL
by thunderpaul
Portoroz Interzonal 1958
from Tal's Tournament and Matches 1949-1973 by jessicafischerqueen
Endgame
from Fischer's Fury by Owl
118
from Chess in the USSR 1945 - 72, Part 2 (Leach) by Chessdreamer


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC