chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Robert James Fischer vs Bent Larsen
Zurich (1959), Zurich SUI, rd 6, May-26
Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack. Mindeno Variation Exchange Line (B11)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 13 more Fischer/Larsen games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-19-03  fred lennox: This game could win my vote for my favorite Fisher draw. The bishop pair does not prove advantage here. It's well known a bishop pair is usually not an advantage in a closed game, which is why Petrosian allows his opponents to have it. I've also come to believe that it is usually not advantage if the opponent can maintain a kingside attack or harrass the king. Which is why Kasparov and some 19th century masters give it. Outside those two conditions, bishop pair is usually an advantage. In this game the kingside attack is maintain with cunning skill. Perhaps Fisher was over optimistic and understandably so.
Aug-19-03  ughaibu: If all the pawns are on the same side knights are usually better than bishops, as here.
Sep-26-03  drukenknight: Fischer/carokann. Here is the game from the Zurich tournament in '59 that the Russians studied in order to meet Bobby at the candidates matches four months later.

Supposedly the Russians had found some mess up in his memorized opening lines. The odd thing is that in this game he plays 7 a3 in order to avoid the pin on the N. When he played the Russians four months later he didnt play that move; so how did they know? I guess they had prepared a line in order to improve on this game. and I guess Fischer played 7 g3 in order to steer out of that, but it backfired.

NOte the pin on f2. That is recurring theme. Bobby should probably break that pin asap the longer it goes the more trouble because black is developing pieces.

Also whites Qn does not have much room to go; and black centralizes the B as a result. In the Adddison game the KN was blocked but he did not threaten to exchange it; the difference between masters and experts, I guess.

13...Qd6 Larsen is not afraid to exchange Q, he is playing strongly. bobby should exchange in order to break that pin. People afraid to swap Qs. Here Larsen finds a way to work his Q to the q side.

21 Bc3 looks like it might be better, since it will be harder for black to defend the e pawn. Also this sets up the mate on g7.

26 Bc3, 5 moves late?

28 Kh2 now he breaks the pin,but no longer exists. He should try to set up f4 is all I can see because the end game does not favor white.

why doesnt he try 34 Bg6 and push the d pawn? it is getting hit by Ns where it is.

all that jockeying for position just before the time control and then Larsen decides he really doesnt need a passed pawn on the q side.

overall a pretty good game, but there is room for improvements

May-06-06  Fast Gun: The only drawn game between these two players!! And it took 92 moves just to achieve it, they certainly believed in going down to the wire and fighting to the death, two fierce competitors of whom some of todays players should try to emulate:
May-28-06  Whitehat1963: Amen to that <Fast Gun>, 13 games and only one draw! And this game proves what Capablanca always said that in the right hands, with pawns on only one side of the board, knights are just as good (if not better) than bishops.
Apr-19-09  paulmorphy41: Why can't white just play 13e5? I see maybe Qb6 14BxN Qxb2 15Rb1 Qxc2 16Rfc1 Qd2 17Bg5! or 15...Qa3 16Rb3 Qa5 17Be7 BxN 18 BxR KxB 19Rxb7. What am I missing
Apr-19-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <paulmorphy41>
On 13. e5, Black has 13...Qc7 getting out of White's pin and adding his own (14. exf6?? Qxg3).
Apr-20-09  paulmorphy41: Of course.. Thank you
Apr-29-09  WhiteRook48: very odd final position
Apr-11-10  Petrosianic: Tal comments in the Tournament Book, on the position after White's 50th:

<'What's the matter? Why is the game not drawn here?', the reader might rightfully ask. Well, Bobby continues woodpushing for another 40 moves. The young American assumes somewhat naively that we in Europe could lose such endgames with black. We give the rest of the game without comment.>

Then, at the end:

<A painful game for the players, for the tournament director, for the annotator, but especially for the poor reader!>

Apr-13-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Morten: Larsen commented on this game saying that especially in his younger years Fisher overestimated the pair of bishops terribly. In this game he played on for 30 moves; he felt he should win since he had the pair of bishops. Meanwhile Larsen's position just got better and better until Fisher barely saved the half point...
Oct-12-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  zydeco: <drukenknight> Interesting. Thanks.
May-08-18  Albion 1959: A fascinating endgame, a war of attrition between the bishop pair v the knight pair, that lasted for more than 40 moves. On an open board, the two bishops are usually advantageous, though as this game shows, there are exceptions:
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
35_BB vs NN - the Squeeze
by whiteshark
how to achieve dreaw w/ 2n vs 2 b
from nic dadamo's favorite games by nic dadamo
5 Carolina Luves Fredthebear
by fredthebear
--> BB:NN
from 58c_middelgames - BB vs NN by whiteshark
BB+3p vs. NN+3p
from Endgame technique by zorro
Fischer's Caro-Kann
by Treev
Game 124
from Best Games (Larsen) by Qindarka
Bishop pair
from Bobby Fischer's approach by edwinrcano149
bishops vs knights - Fischer & Larsen only draw
from DrChopper's good games 3 by DrChopper
--> BB:NN
from 58c_middelgames - BB vs NN by Jaredfchess
Round Six
from Zurich 1959 by suenteus po 147
BB+3p vs. NN+3p
from Endgame technique by Patca63


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC