Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Viktor Korchnoi vs Hansjuerg Kaenel
Biel (1979)
Dutch Defense: Janzen-Korchnoi Gambit (A80)  ·  1-0


explore this opening
find similar games 4,423 more games of Korchnoi
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you register a free account you will be able to create game collections and add games and notes to them. For more information on game collections, see our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-09-04  Poisonpawns: Is this Korchnoi attack unsound? It seems pretty tough in this game.I am scared to play against this in the Dutch defense.
Nov-12-04  Poisonpawns: 9..Bg7 10.0-0-0 Qa5 11.Bh6 Bxh6 12.Qxh6 Be6 13.Kb1 Rf8 14.Bg2 Nbd7 15.Nge2 0-0-0 16.d5 cxd5 17.Nf4 Bf7 18.Nfxd5 This is still slightly unclear to me can anyone help with analysis? This seems like a good weapon against the dutch.
Nov-23-04  Poisonpawns: Does anyone know how to play for black against this line? I was thinking, first of all instead of 5...d6 to play d5, which could be followed by 6.e5 Bf5
Nov-23-04  Swindler: Ain't this an idea in the Sicilian (though reversed)? 1.e4 c5 2.a3? Saw a new book about it.
Nov-23-04  I sacrifice like Tal: I'll put it this way.

"Black has done nothing wrong."

So, White's 'attack' should be unsound in some sense. I think Blac is fine is he can castle queenside and offset the white centre comehow. Or maybe playing e6 or d6 instead of Nf6. I'm not sure. But it IS interesting.

Nov-24-04  Poisonpawns: Yes thats true but does any Dutch player have experience and or analysis in this line. It would be nice to here from a GM or IM :-)
Nov-24-04  drukenknight: why doesnt black push his own h pawn in order to put the question to the B? You will mess up these gambit lines all the time if you dont attempt to force exchanges.
Apr-15-05  Poisonpawns: Just wanted to say I am 2-0 now after using this line as white in tourneys,against 2100+ opposition.This is a nasty anti-dutch weapon!
Nov-16-05  refutor: <poisonpawns> did you come to a conclusion about ...d5 v. ...d6?
Nov-16-05  mrbasso: 3...d5! is the best move.
The best way to refute a Gambit is to decline it.
May-18-09  Poisonpawns: I claimed another victim 1955 rated player this weekend in this line.I just give the opening 1.d4 f5 2.h3 d6 3.g4 fxg4 5.hxg4 Bxg4 6.f3 Be6 7.e4 the rest went quite similar to the korchnoi game.The opponent had the extra pawn, but was unable to solve his positional problems.
Oct-28-09  jmboutiere: 3...d5 - 0.5 Rybka 3
6...c6 - 0.02
12...Nh5 + 0.36; 12...h6 + 0.09
19.a4 - 0.02
22.Ng2 - 0.85 the same for 22...Rb8; 22...Nc8 + 0.00
23...Kf8 +1.40; 23...Rb8 - 1.23
24...Bh6 + 1.63; 24...Rb8 +4.58
29.Ng5 +6.01; 29.Qh3 +3.45
37... Rg5 mate in 4
Nov-03-09  ajile: <mrbasso: 3...d5! is the best move. The best way to refute a Gambit is to decline it.>

This I think depends on the defender's temperament. Also there are openings where Black might give the material back but not immediately. So there are actually 3 different scenarios.

Accept but give back later

Basically the usual theme is that the Gambiteer is trading material for a time/developing advantage. If he is successful he will get the material back and/or develop a winning attack. However the downside is that if the player accepting the gambit can hold off the attack then he will have a material advantage.

If you are a patient good defender and you play well under long term pressure then accepting the gambit would be the best way for YOU to attempt to refute the gambit.

If you don't play well under these circumstances then either declining or returning the material quickly is probably your best way to attempt to refute the gambit.

For example the King's Gambit. Both the accepted variation (1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4) and the Falkbeer Counter Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.f4 d5) work well for Black but lead to very different types of games.

Bobby Fischer of course would have said to take the pawn and make White prove he has something tangible.


Premium Chessgames Member
  eternaloptimist: <ajile> u made some excellent points on who should accept gambits & who should decline them but I disagree w/ Fischer's philosophy. I agree wholeheartedly w/ your points though.
Feb-08-12  King Death: < ajile:...For example the King's Gambit. Both the accepted variation (1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4) and the Falkbeer Counter Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.f4 d5) work well for Black but lead to very different types of games...>

The Accepted is okay for Black if he knows a decent amount of theory but in the Falkbeer the old main line (1.e4 e5 2.f4 d5 3.ed e4) isn't rated all that highly by theory today. Black usually plays either 3.ed c6 or 3.ed ef, to get a line in the gambit accepted while avoiding 3.Bc4 which has become popular again in the last 15-20 years.

Jun-06-12  Nova: So, has there been any refutation of this gambit, or is it still viable today? I like the way it looks and hope to use it!
Jun-06-12  Shams: <Nova> Sadly 3...d5 seems to give Black the better chances: Opening Explorer
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <mrbasso....The best way to refute a Gambit is to decline it.>

In many cases I agree with this.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Dutch, Janzen-Korchnoi Gambit 2.h3 3.g4 (A80) 1-0
from Tromp, Torre Attack, Byrne Bg5 Stuff Fredthebear by Jersey Joe
Crazy Attacks
by OneArmedScissor
Korchnoi Gambit 1. d4 f5 2. h3 Nf6 3. g4 fg4 4. hg4 Ng4 5.e4 d6
from Headed to Holland Next Year with Fredthebear by fredthebear
Dutch, Janzen-Korchnoi Gambit 2.h3 3.g4 (A80) 1-0
from y g-pawn/file demolitions grapple w/Fredthebear by fredthebear
The Dutch Defense
by MadBishop
princepawn's favorite games
by princepawn
Anti-Dutch Korchnoi attack
from Poisonpawns must see games! by Poisonpawns
Dutch Defense: Janzen-Korchnoi Gambit
from adichess' A00-D09 by adichess
Korchnoi Attack, 2.h3!? Nf6 3.g4 fxg4
from Dutch Defence by KingG
2.h3 Korchnoi attack
from interesting opening novelties by refutor

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC