chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Emanuel Lasker vs Geza Maroczy
New York (1924), New York, NY USA, rd 20, Apr-13
French Defense: Winawer. Maroczy-Wallis Variation (C18)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 27 times; par: 80 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 6 more Lasker/Maroczy games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-24-05  Rama: This game is annotated by Alekhine in the tournament book, "NY 1924". That book made a big impression on me.
Mar-25-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Rama, this game might have made a big impression on Alekhine. Playing through the moves, I was struck at how Lasker's combined attacks down the Queen side, center and King side seemed to anticipate Alekhine's peak years, when he would launch attacks over the entire board.

It makes me wonder; how much did working on this book improved Alekhine's game?

Mar-25-05  asuka: i want to ask.. on move 10 of black, why not take the center pawn with a knight?
Mar-25-05  asuka: sorry if my questions may appear stupid to some of you people, im a begginer in chess but i really like his game. i want ask why 5.a3? doesn't it ruin the pawns on the queen side?
Mar-25-05  Rama: 5. a3 puts the question to the Bishop whose convenient path of retreat to e7 is now cut off. If it goes to a4 then the pawn c5 is without protection. Look at black's pawns -- they are on white squares. Thus the plan is to force the exchange of the good B creating a slight plus for white.

10. ... Nxe5 would be very unwise. After the exchange, black is undeveloped with Queen and King in the center. 12. Re1, 13. Bb5+ and 14. Qxd4 get the attack rolling.

Jul-13-06  RookFile: In this game, 7. Qg4 is a good move.
Jun-15-07  New Kasparov: why not 8..Qxc3+?
Jun-15-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: 8...Qxc3+ is playable, but White gets good play for the pawn. See Aitken vs P N Wallis, 1949
Jun-15-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pawn and Two: <New Kasparov: why not 8...Qxc3+?>

Alekhine in the New York 1924 tournament book states: <Black rightly prefers to finish his development first, inasmuch as even a later protection of the pawn would exclude every prospect for an attack on the part of White. The game, even after the first few moves, has assumed a very distinct character.>

Jun-15-07  Wolfgang01: Asuka: There are never stupid questions, only stupid answers!!

Sorry for my late answer. But two years ago I had no www

Lasker had a great heart as chess-fighter. In NY 1924 he won before Capablanca, who had taken his world-championship.

Jul-04-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: This game was played in round 20 and was instrumental in Lasker finishing first ahead of capablanca. 5..cd isn't played much anymore. White gives up a pawn but gets a great attacking position. 16 Bc3 allows Maroczy some interesting defensive possiblilites because the bishop is unprotected; 16 Bc1 may have been better. Maroczy's 20..g6 and 21..Nb6 is a really clever defense leading to a clear advantage for black. 24..Qe7 was an error; giving up the c file. Alekhine recommends 24..Na4 25 Rc1..b5. Pachman said that 24..Rfc8 also would have maintained an advantage for black. One of the ideas behind 32 Nd4 was that 32..Qe5 33 Nf3..Qd6 34 Bf4 follwed by 35 Be5+ wins the exhange. In this line Alekhine does not mention 33..Qe2 34 Bc3+..Nc3 35 Re2..Ne2 which looks like it might be playable for black. Neither Alekhine or Pachman mention why Maroczy didn't play 32..Nd4 which avoids having his kingside pawns fractured. 35 Qa7? was a mistake by Lasker that should have cost him the game after 35..d4!(not 35..Qe5? 36 Be3!) but instead of following up with 36..Rc2 which would have led to a powerful attack for Maroczy he played instead 36..Qe5?. After either 41..f4+ or 43..Re6 Maroczy still would have had drawing chances.
Oct-15-07  Rama: I don't like Maroczy's 9. ... Ng6. The piece stays there for a while doing little, then goes back to e7 and finally lands on its proper post, f5.

The French is all about the d4-square. This is why the move 5. ... cxd4, is important: black conquers d4 right away.

This is why the move 9. ... Nbc6, is better than Ng6. Note that white has not yet castled, so 10. b5 Nxe5, 11. Nxe5 Qxe5+, is a check and thus playable.

After both players castle, then ... Nf5, is available. I have even played a provocative ... h5, to protect the Nf5 from white's g-pawn, and won the game.

Nov-11-07  Ulhumbrus: 32..Qd7 allows White to win a pawn by 33 Nxf5 + exf5 34 Qd4 threatening 35 both e6+ and 35 Qxa7. 32...Qb6 is one way to avoid that.
Nov-13-07  Rama: Now I'm looking again, you have hit upon an important juncture in the game. 31. ... Nc3, is interesting.

If the Bishop takes, black penetrates on the file. If white plays the threatened Ra2 to c2, black continues onward with Ne2. Now the push d5-d4 suddenly opens the long diagonal direct to the white King, with Qb7 available.

May-16-15  Howard: As an earlier comment points out, Lasker should damn well have lost this game !
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 46
from World Champion - Lasker (I.Linder/V.Linder) by Qindarka
2/26/18 95/78 very good
from Guess the Move by yiotta
Game 21
from Decisive Games (Pachman) by Qindarka
French Defense: Winawer. Maroczy-Wallis Variation
from WINAWER by JoseTigranTalFischer
French Defense: Winawer. Maroczy-Wallis Variation
from GUESS THE MOVE by gambitfan
Round 20 April 13th
from New York 1924 by Benzol
5.a3 cxd4
from French Progressions French by fredthebear
Game 21 in Pachman's Decisive Games by Ludek Pachman
from Published Games by Year and Unconfirmed Source 4 by fredthebear
French Expressions
by BAJones
Queen and Pawn endings
by bengalcat47
French Defense: Winawer. Maroczy-Wallis Variation
from WINAWER by gambitfan
Round 20 April 13th
from New York 1924 by JoseTigranTalFischer
Round 20 April 13th
from New York 1924 - Alekhine by vantheanh
Round 20 April 13th
from New York 1924 - Alekhine by StoppedClock


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC