|Jul-15-04|| ||themindset: wouldn't 11.Qe2 be better here? |
|Aug-28-04|| ||Whitehat1963: Tal miscalculates. |
|Jan-20-05|| ||refutor: i've got a headache from analyzing this game with the help of Kasparov in OMGP vol. 3. i've spent a good portion of my evening looking at this game and the variations he gives are headspinning... |
|Nov-20-12|| ||An Englishman: Good Evening: It was no easy matter replying to Tal's bad sacrifices. Perhaps I'm just imagining things but it appears that Polugaevsky did not fully neutralize White's initiative until 58...Ng5+.|
|Nov-20-12|| ||SimonWebbsTiger: 19...Be6! is better (Kasparov)
26.Qd3! with winning chances (Lepeshkin, confirmed by the silicon)
30.Qh4= and 34...Rb8 (Kasparov)
|Nov-22-12|| ||An Englishman: Good Evening: <SimonWebbsTiger>, 19...Be6 is impossible; did you mean 19...Bf6?|
|Nov-22-12|| ||SimonWebbsTiger: confound my clerical skills! I did mean <19...Ba6> and not the impossible Be6.|
As an aside, the entire line was anybody's guess as late as Nunn's massive work on the Najdorf. Kasparov and the Silicon seem to have settled matters now, though.
|May-13-17|| ||GrahamClayton: Polugaevsky must have got a shock when Tal played 10. ♗xb5+ - the most feared attacking player in the world playing what was probably a prepared novelty/TN early in the opening. Polugaevsky then had to refute the sacrifice over the board, with the clock ticking, which he did.|
|May-14-17|| ||offramp: Polugaevsky says that he knew Tal would have a novelty planned against The Polugaevsky Variation. This was game 2, and Tal produced his novelty in game 4 ( Tal vs Polugaevsky, 1980 ).|
Polugaevsky thinks that Tal thought that his G4 novelty would win, after which Polugaevsky would stop using his Variation for the match.
So, reasoned Polugaevsky, Tal must have decided to play game 2 off-the-cuff, in his good old style. If Tal lost or drew, he would still be able to use his novelty in G4 (because Polugaevsky would carry on using his Variation). If he won, well, that's a win and he could use his novelty in the future.
In the end Tal ended up with a ½ point out of the 2 games.
In any case, Polugaevsky had been looking at possible early sacrifices on b5, and he was confident his Variation could withstand them all.
The Polugaevsky Variation is a fantastic fighting opening and it is a shame the Defence more or less died with him.
|May-14-17|| ||morfishine: Fantastic game, one could spend hours and hours going over the variations|
|May-14-17|| ||offramp: I know the Polu Variation. White should never play f6xg7. It always looks good, but it is always bad.|
Spot an error? Please
submit a correction slip
and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous,
and 100% free--plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
- No personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No posting personal information of members.
See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.|
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC