chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Vladimir Kramnik vs Viswanathan Anand
Mainz CC Champions Duel (2001) (rapid), Mainz GER, rd 5, Jun-29
Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense. Main Lines (D27)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 27 times; par: 83 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 207 more Kramnik/Anand games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-31-04  Benjamin Lau: This is a superb game from both players. Kramnik plays a very fine attacking game (so much for his manifesto of defensive chess) and it's difficult to see where he goes wrong. The sacrifice looks pretty sound, but Anand refutes it rather easily with his piece trades. He finishes up the endgame with some very nice technique right when Kramnik looks like he might sneak away with the draw.
Jul-26-04  Gavnyce: Anand played very well here and defended the undefendable sac and finished off the game good job vishy
Jul-26-04  Keshishian: I didn't know you could force (repeat the force part) mate with a bishop and knight. I know how to do it with two bishops, but just never thought about the knight-bishop duo.
Jul-26-04  Benzol: <Keshishian> It's suprising the number of strong players I've seen locally who don't know how to do it. Capablanca shows it in his book 'Chess Fundamentals'.
Oct-18-05  svbabu: 20.Nxh6 doesn't look good to me. I would prefer 20.NxB QxN 21.Rd1 ...
Dec-16-05  Conde de Montecristo: Kramnik's sacrifices never works.
Dec-16-05  pankajdaga: What's the continuation here?
Dec-16-05  suenteus po 147: <pankajdaga> I don't have a specific line, but essentially, white can't defend the two pawns, and then it's K+B+N vs. K which is a win.
Dec-16-05  KingG: <pankajdaga> The pawns can't be saved, and then it's ♗+♘ vs ♔, which for a top grandmaster is an easy mate.
Dec-16-05  suenteus po 147: <KingG> lol! Jynx!
Dec-16-05  KingG: <suenteus po 147> lol. We must have posted at the same time.
Dec-17-05  sucaba: 18. ♕c4 or 18. ♖e1 may be worth a try. For example 18. ♕c4 ♖h7 19. ♖e1 g5 20. e5 ♘xe5 21. ♘xe5 ♗xe5 22. ♕b5+ ♖d7 23. ♘xg5 .

White has a 5/6 score with 8. e4 in this database, Romanishin vs Baburin, 1996 for a quick example.

Aug-09-06  positionalgenius: Phenomenal game by Anand.
Jun-15-07  Draw Odds: Maybe the names of the players were switched by accident. ;-)
Mar-27-08  sheaf: probably kramnik missed 19..Bxe4, after which blacks bishops are very powerfully placed at the center.. , 20. Nxh6 cant be a good move, clearly opening the file for the rook just for a sorry h pawn. after 20.Nxh6+, whites bishop on c1 and 'hyperactive 'Knight on h6 are the only two pieces on active squares.. and blacks next move manages to eliminate both of them. hard to believe the sac was sound, but vishy produced an incredible defense in a difficult position...particularly when he was trailing in the match..
Jan-08-13  Derived: Very well played.
Jan-31-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  OBIT: Going by the Chessgames database, Anand had remarkable success playing the QGA from 1996 through 2002, winning ten games with the opening while losing only three. All three losses were to Kramnik. Not this one, however!

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: RAPID. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC