Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Emanuel Lasker vs Jose Raul Capablanca
Lasker - Capablanca World Championship Match (1921), Havana CUB, rd 2, Mar-17
Queen's Gambit Declined: Barmen Variation (D37)  ·  1/2-1/2


Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [16649 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 23 more Lasker/Capablanca games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you find a mistake in the database, use the correction form. There is a link at the bottom that reads "Spot an error? Please suggest your correction..." Avoid posting corrections in the kibitzing area.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Instead of 14.Nb3 Lasker thought 14.Bc2 might have been better. There was also the modern-looking 14.Bxb5 axb5 15.Nxe6.

click for larger view

Jul-02-07  ChessDude33: <offramp> In the notes Capa says 14.Bxb5 leads to a won game for black.
Mar-02-08  Knight13: Capablanca's notes indicate that even he himself missed a lot of good moves in a position which he called "superior." I wonder when he had to start pressing for time that made him do all of those.
Aug-17-08  cn1ght: Can someone explain Capa's comment on move 12 about e4 being a bad move? I mean, I understand what he means, but I disagree because this is the same concept that the colle system uses, you push e4 later in the game after you have solidified it or something making White's center more commanding. Am I wrong on thinking it is a similar concept the the Colle system, or did Capa not consider this?
Jun-17-09  WhiteRook48: nice draw
Nov-16-11  King Death: A nice trick here is 26.Re1 Bb4 27.Qf3 Be1 28.Qf6 Qf2+ and wins.
Nov-25-11  AnalyzeThis: In the opening, I was thinking of some systems in the Ruy Lopez where white plays d3 first, and then plays d4 later when it's more inconvenient for black. It was an interesting try by Lasker.
Jun-20-15  MindCtrol9: I'm from Cuba and very proud of that where Capablanca is.I have been always a great fan of Lasker's mastery.I wondering why he could lose to Capablanca having good games like this one for example.Capablanca was great and Lasker, too.Lasker lost the title, but he kept his playing strength up to his retirement.Both of them, Capablanca and Lasker, left beautiful games for all of us to enjoy and study.My opinion about this match is that Capablanca used the same style like Lasker, but something has been telling me for years that Lasker could beat Capablanca.
Jun-20-15  MindCtrol9: Moscow 1935 was a very strong tournament and Lasker finished undefeated beating Capablanca and Pirc.Lasker was 66 at the time, and this says it all.
Dec-06-17  RookFile: Black had no problems. If you play 1. d4 d5 2. c4 dxc4 you reach the Queen's gambit accepted. After 3. e3 Nf6 4. Bxc4 white puts his bishop on c4.

In this game white first plays Bd3 and later plays Bxc4. The end result is a queen's gambit accepted where black has an extra move than he normally does. Such a position cannot be bad for black.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
April, p. 68 [Game 67 / 3882]
from American Chess Bulletin 1921 by Phony Benoni
Capablanca vs Lasker WCM 1921
by ilcca
Game 2, Match tied 1-1 (0-0)
from 1921 World Chess Championship by Penguincw
Match Capablanca!
by amadeus
by 67JediChessMaster
WCC: Lasker-Capablanca 1921
by WCC Editing Project
from Match Lasker-Capablanca by Nobis
Kings of Chess by William Winter
by samsloan
Game 16
from Kings of Chess (Winter) by Qindarka
Match Lasker!
by amadeus
On the shoulders of giants
by ughaibu

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC