|Nov-04-03|| ||mjk: 4. Bg5? loses at least a piece. |
|Jul-01-04|| ||marcus13: A la Légal! |
|Mar-12-05|| ||erasmus: the move 4.Bg5 will not necessarily lose a piece, but black will have an advantage. The bishop can be saved:
4.Bg5 Ne4 6.Be3 Bxe3 7.fxe3 Qh4+ 8.g3 Nxg3 9.Nf3 Qh6 10.Rg1. Black won a pawn and is positionally better.
For a better continuation of 4.Bg5? with black see K Zimak vs Sobek Jaroslav, 1992 |
|Apr-16-05|| ||Zaius: 5. Bxd8 is the greediest move I've ever seen. |
|Aug-31-05|| ||Bishoprick: Milton Hanauer gave me my first job after graduating from college. Had fun for many years playing him (and Milton Finkelstein)over lunch. When I knew him he always played the Caro-Kan against e4, but he only played skittles. He had given up chess and had morphed into an avid bridge player on the second floor of the Marshall Chess Club. Thanks for reminding me of him in this silly miniature.|
|Feb-22-06|| ||kevin86: Could this be ARNOLD the newsboy of Fred Flintstone-----Obvious it's not Arnold Ziffel,the pig;he is far smarter than this. lol|
|Feb-22-06|| ||Jim Bartle: No, it's Tom Arnold, star of the famed documentary "The Stupids."|
|Aug-27-10|| ||Lil Swine: its like a wall street tragedy, black gets the big money, then loses it all, a classical representation of greed and punishment, or like madoff, he scams a bunch of money and then is caught, chess is not only strategic and mind- blowing, but its also realistic|
|Aug-27-10|| ||Phony Benoni: The poor fellow playing White was <W. C. Arnold>. You can do with that as you wish, but apparently when it came to chess he was not outstanding in his Fields. Not to mention that, after the game, he probably would not rather have been in Philadelphia.|
This was from a preliminary section of the 1936 American Chess Federation Congress (now known as the U.S. Open). Arnold finished last, scoring 1.5/12. I have no idea where he got the points. Hanauer finished fourth in the premilinary second, then 10th out of 12 players in the championship final.
|Oct-29-14|| ||sharpnova: @Zaius - How so?
I've seen people mated or at least really decisively punished for taking as little as a pawn.
Taking a whole queen for mate is less greedy than that.
|Nov-14-15|| ||Phony Benoni: An early publication of the game from the "New York Evening Post", September 3??), 1936, though the loser's name is charitably disguised:|
|Dec-23-15|| ||pumping707: Good trap....looking forward to use it for my greedy friends...lols|
|Dec-23-15|| ||epistle: One of life's greatest pleasures: to hold the queen in your hand.|
|Feb-26-16|| ||Phony Benoni: Hey, guess what? <4.Bg5> was an attempt at a theoretical improvement!|
Kirk D Holland - Clarence Kraszewski
36th ACF Congress (US Open),Consolation
Milwaukee, WI USA, 07.1935
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e5 3.d5 Bc5 <4.Nc3> 0-0 5.e3 a6 6.Bd3 d6 7.h3 Qe7 8.Qc2 Nbd7 9.Nge2 Ba7 10.Ng3 Nc5 11.b4 Nxd3+ 12.Qxd3 Bd7 13.e4 Rae8 14.Be3 Bxe3 15.Qxe3 a5 16.b5 b6 17.0-0 Bc8 18.Kh1 Nd7 19.Na4 g6 20.Qd3 Qg5 21.Rae1 f5 22.Kh2 f4 23.Ne2 Nf6 24.Ng1 Qh6 25.f3 g5 26.Nb2 g4 27.fxg4 Nxg4+ 28.Kh1 Ne3 29.Rf3 Bg4 30.Rf2 Qh4 31.Qd2 Kh8 32.Nf3 Bxf3 33.Rxf3 Rg8 34.Rexe3 fxe3 35.Rxe3 Ref8 36.Kg1 Rf4 37.Qe2 Rgf8 38.Nd3 R4f6 39.Kh2 a4 40.g3 Qh6 41.Kg2 R8f7 42.Qg4 Qxe3 43.h4 Qxd3 44.Qc8+ Rf8 45.Qxc7 Qf1+ 46.Kh2 Rf2# 0-1
Not much of an improvement, perhaps, but it looks like Fred did his homework. Too bad the dog didn't eat it.