Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

register now - it's free!
Viswanathan Anand vs Alexey Shirov
Corus (2004)  ·  Russian Game: Classical Attack. Marshall Variation (C42)  ·  1-0
To move:
Last move:

explore this opening
find similar games 91 more Anand/Shirov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: As you play through the game, you can get the FEN code for any position by right-clicking on the board and choosing "Copy Position (EPD)". Copy and paste the FEN into a post to display a diagram.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-24-04  pilot: Great endgame play by Anand.
Premium Chessgames Member
  nasmichael: It is nice to see the game move to this stage of play. The fight should be a ground war. Makes the player think, makes the audience think.
Premium Chessgames Member
  nasmichael: Although of course,they are not to pander to the crowd. Play to win, not to look pretty.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Reisswolf: Isn't this the game in which the endgame is supposedly a theoretical draw? I vaguely remember reading something about this when it was first published on Chessbase or Corus.

Apparently there's a new tool called Tablebases or something, that proves that the endgame is a theoretical draw. However, it would have been no easy task for Shirov to find the draw, which is why Anand went for the endgame in the first place.

Premium Chessgames Member
  nasmichael: Do you know the moves that secure the draw? It seems to be a difficult challenge for Shirov to find at the time.

Have you ever seen a tourney that used these hard to find draws as puzzle positions in between rounds? That would be an interesting addition to a tourney.

Especially if the commentaries had not come out to the public. Research beforehand to ensure it had not been studied by the masses, and get good players to do it onsite. "Find the draw and win a prize" or something of that nature.

Feb-17-04  JGD: The position after (40. a4) seems to me to be a draw. Shirov, typically quite a good endgame player, blunders with (40. ...Rb4?)and gives Anand a clearly won position.
Premium Chessgames Member
  bumpmobile: I guess I need to study my chernev endings book, but I don't see the win. Could someone help me out?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Reisswolf: <bumpmobile>, I doubt your Chernev book will be of much help. The draw is supposedly quite difficult. I quote from

<Those of us who have the spiffy new ChessBase Endgame Turbo DVDs could play the cruel game of seeing if the super-GMs could find the computer-perfect moves.

Shirov slipped from the narrow path here when the gigantic six-man tablebases in Endgame Turbo say that Black has six moves to draw. Shirov's 40...Rb4 was not one of them. (Rook to g5, g7, or g8 or king to e7, f7, or g5 if you're interested. Keeping the white king trapped on the h-file is the common denominator.) Of course finding one drawing move doesn't mean you'll find the next 20 or 30.

After that Anand was relentless. He didn't play perfectly but he never let the win slip away. A pity Shirov had to make such a critical decision on move 40. Still, these endgames are terribly hard to defend under the best circumstances.

How important are tablebases to the endgame play of chess engines? Using Fritz 8 on my laptop which unlike my desktop doesn't have the space for a few dozen gigabytes of tablebases unless I delete all my Caetano Veloso Vorbis files and run DOS 1.2 it evaluates the drawing moves and most of the losing moves with the same +2.44 score. That's with most of the five-man tablebases but not the critical six-man R+2 pawns vs R database that weighs in at 4.35 GB. I guess I could always run it off the DVD directly...>

The entire report can be read here:

Like I mentioned earlier, the draw is not easy to find. The commentators said that it came down to a theoretical possibility versus practical chances, and Anand's practical chances won easily.

Jun-25-04  arifattar: Was this a rapid game? Looks like it.
Oct-15-04  aw1988: <arifattar> No, Wijk Aan Zee is not rapid. 90 30 if I remember correctly.
Nov-29-04  Marco65: Few people know that at it is possible to query online a 5-piece tablebase. Looking at that, Anand is really a god. He played 50.Ra8 when 50...Kxf5 loses. After 52...Kg7 this seems like the Vancura position reported as a draw in many books, unfortunately the black rook is on h4. Were it on f4, or even b4, the endgame would be a draw. Btw, 53.Ra7+ is the only winning move, again courtesy of For people wondering how White wins, this is the main line:

56.a7 Kg6 57.Rb7 Kf6 58.Kb3 Ra1 59.Kc4 Ke5 60.Kc5 Ra6 61.Kb5 Ra1 62.Kc6 Rc1+ 63.Kb6 Rb1+ 64.Kc7 Rc1+ 65.Kb8

Oct-20-06  suenteus po 147: Sometimes you have to see a grandmaster against the correct opponent to see that player's brilliance. After seeing this game, I must say this Anand fellow is most impressive. One of the very best, in fact :)
Oct-21-06  Open Defence: I don't know if it is because my chess is improving but nowadays when I play over Anand's games I think they are simply amazing!...
Oct-21-06  notyetagm: <Open Defence: I don't know if it is because my chess is improving but nowadays when I play over Anand's games I think they are simply amazing!...>

No, Anand is really a chess genius.

Just don't bet on him when all the chips are on the table.

Oct-21-06  Open Defence: <notyetagm> I tend to look at a player's best games rather than best results... e.g. Keres for me ranks with the very best as he produced games of exceptional quality... so did Sultan Khan.. however I earlier felt that Anand's games lacked a certain creative element.. but I was wrong.. when I look at his games now I see a very strong creative element.. one which I was probably too weak a player to see earlier..
Oct-21-06  Lt. Col. Majid: I agree. Anand is a genius.
Oct-21-06  notyetagm: <Lt. Col. Majid: I agree. Anand is a genius.>

Wow, we actually agree on something, you good-for-nothing Kramnik-lover. :-)

Oct-21-06  Open Defence: <notyetagm> lol.. Leko rules then!!!
Oct-21-06  Lt. Col. Majid: <notyetagm: <Lt. Col. Majid: I agree. Anand is a genius.> Wow, we actually agree on something, you good-for-nothing Kramnik-lover. :-) >

More on the side of fairness than being a Kramnik lover:)

His unwarranted 24/7 mindless bashing turned many ordinary chess fans into the Kramnik camp out of sympathy and in disgust.

Then Topalov's "unethical" masterstroke behaviour in Elista turned many more fans of his like myself off him completely.

Oct-21-06  notyetagm: <Lt. Col. Majid> Can't argue with that.

I am just a huge fan of Topalov's Fighting Chess. Much like I am a fan of Fischer's and Alekhine's chess without endorsing their crazy anti-Semitic views.

Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Position after 38.Rxa7+ is a tablebase draw.

click for larger view

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Petrov, Main Line
by KingG
Anand shows great technique in a R+2P v R endgame
from EG Rook Plus Endgames by fredthebear
Anand shows great technique in a R+2P v R endgame
from Anand Grand by fredthebear
Vishy shows good technique in R and P endgame
from AdrianP's Bookmarked Games (2004) by AdrianP
Position after 38.Rxa7+ is a TB draw but Shirov blows it.
from yy_x- - -> HALL OF BLAME by whiteshark
anand perfect end
from endings by gmlisowitz
Instructive rook endings
by beatgiant
end games
by senankit
Anand shows great technique in a R+2P v R endgame
from P Ds to Open Flame Games by fredthebear
R+P vs R
from Endgames Kibitzed by FENfiend
Anand shows great technique in a R+2P v R endgame
from Endgame Lessons by notyetagm
from Anand's rook endgames by setuhanu01
I came to play! : Nasmichael's Favorites.
by nasmichael

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC