Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

D T Phillips vs Harry Nelson Pillsbury
"The Chicago Gambit" (game of the day Feb-15-2018)
Simul, 27b (1899) (exhibition), Chicago, IL USA, Jan-07
King Pawn Game: Schulze-Muller Gambit (C40)  ·  1-0


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 31 times; par: 68 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 546 more games of Pillsbury
sac: 3.Nxe5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-31-06  Richerby: <Eggman>, I've heard exactly the same line used to explain why it's called the Irish Gambit so I suspect it's apocryphal.
May-19-06  asip87: haha...i cant believe white is gonna win at the first time, is it chicago gambit suppose to sac knight at the first time??, a threat...lolzz...neve seen b4 this opening in my whole life, even if i played with newbie, they also didnt think about that, dats true, after all, white's prove dat hes not
Sep-03-06  ahmadov: Chicago Gambit must be a blunder of the XIX century. However, in this only game of this database the side to blunder wins :0).
Sep-23-06  T Ciddasselepoh: This game must be a joke. The only person that could have possibly thrown Pillsbury a knight and still win was Paul Morphy.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pawn and Two: This game is also included in Jacques Pope's book, "Harry Nelson Pillsbury - American Chess Champion". The game also appeared in print in the Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 01/12/1899.

Playing White was D.T. Phillips. The game was played in a simultaneous exhibition in Chicago, IL on 01/07/1899.

This simultaneous exhibition was unusual in that Pillsbury played both chess and checkers.

His score at chess was +20 -2 =5 and his score at checkers was +7 -1 =2.

Feb-17-08  TigerG: Is this game even real? I couldn't see Pillsbury lose to this variation. Plus, the Chicago gambit doesn't seem like a real opening.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: <Pawn and Two> Thanks! I sort of wondered why H.M. Philips, a New Yorker, was in a Chicago simul.
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <37.Bc3!!> with the threat of Qd4 is promptly decisive.

click for larger view

Premium Chessgames Member
  ketchuplover: best. opening. ever. !.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Phillips probably assumed that Pillsbury had played the Petroff.
Feb-02-09  WhiteRook48: 3 Nxe5 can't possibly be sound
May-02-09  WhiteRook48: I thought it was 32 Bxf5 that was decisive
May-04-09  WhiteRook48: 4...Ng6 is better
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: So, *is* the pawn protected, or what?
Jan-06-10  The Famous Chess Cat: <PhonyBenoni> Aha! That was my first reaction! I have a unicorn avatar! Sentence ending in an exclamation mark! That was a sentence fragment! Aha!

Your eyes just got pwned!

But excellent that we thought the same thing...

Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Also know as the Irish Gambit.
Mar-25-12  Granny O Doul: Is this how the "d'oh!" boy was born?
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: If only 3.Nxe5!! had been known four years earlier, Hastings (1895) might have turned out much differently. Pillsbury played 2...Nc6?! <six> times in that tournament, scoring 4.5 points. Hastings (1895)/Harry Nelson Pillsbury But no one took the pawn!
Feb-15-18  schnarre: ...Wonder if this wildness came out of a trip to the World's Fair?
Feb-15-18  newzild: Reminds me of the (quite dangerous) Cochrane's Gambit in the Petroff, except White gets only one pawn rather than two.
Feb-15-18  morfishine: Hey, no fair, Pillsbury is giving a simul, but he's got Black?
Feb-15-18  RookFile: That used to happen all the time. I remember playing over some Lasker games where Lasker had black.
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheTamale: Lots of disparaging going on against the Chicago Gambit, but here a complete unknown uses it to defeat one of the strongest masters in the world. I'm speculating now, of course, but I believe I could use it to defeat Nakamura.
Premium Chessgames Member

Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter.

Try Again. Fail again. Fail better.

-- Samuel Beckett

Premium Chessgames Member
  Breunor: Checking with the silicon evaluator:

After 18 Be3, Stockfish recommends g5 (19 Be4 gxf4 20 Bx f4 Bg5 21 Qc2 Bxf4 22 Bxh7 ch Kg7 23Rx f4 Qh4) for an evaluation of -2.42

The game move b6 evaluates to -0.8

After 20 Bc2 Stockfish recommends Nh6 (-1) instead of a5(-0.44)

After 21 Rf3, g6 is -1.2, while Nh8 is 0.

Black gets a reprieve, 22 g5 stays at 0, but Rh3 brings the score to -1.24

After 27 a3, the score would be -1.73 if black plays R5f7; R8f7 sets white to +0.15

After 28 b4, white is at 0 if black plays Na4; but after Nb7, the score is 0.8

The losing move should have been the 29th; after Bd4 white would be 0.8, but Bd2 gives black another chance. 29 c5 is evaluated at 0.08; the 'initial' losing move is Qe8 (3.45).

Whiteshark's 37 Bc3 is crushing, (7.38)although the actual g6 is still 2.79

Once again, white lets black back into the game with 39 Qf5 (1.32); Rh3 evaluates at 3.18.

The absolute final losing move then is 40 ... Bf6. axb4 is 0.87, but Bf6 is 7.84.

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: EXHIBITION. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Schulze-Muller Gambit (C44) 1-0 A.K.A. Chicago / Irish Gambit
from On the Edge of Fredthebear's Cliff Ledge by fredthebear
Sorry, there are no games similar to this one in
by ughaibu
Schulze-Muller Gambit
from Unorthodox Games; Unusual Names [ECO=B,C] by GG by fredthebear
P-K4 Schulze-Muller Gambit (C44) 1-0 Chicago/Irish Gambit
from Pins Ins and Outs, ECO C 20s, 40s, 50s, 60s-90s by rbaglini
by BobgJ
June 6: The Chicago Gambit
from Game of the Day 2004 by Phony Benoni
Schulze-Muller Gambit
from Unorthodox Games; Unusual Names [ECO=B,C] by GumboGambit
Uncommon Openings
by Morphischer
Pillsbury loses in "Chicago" (gambit)
from 19 th century classics by kevin86
King's Knight's Opening 3.Nxe5?? (but it beat Pillsbury!)
from Horrible theoretical novelties by FSR
June 6: The Chicago Gambit
from Game of the Day 2004 by Jaredfchess

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC