chessgames.com

Pillsbury 
 
Harry Nelson Pillsbury
Number of games in database: 435
Years covered: 1889 to 1904
Overall record: +224 -95 =104 (65.2%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
      Based on games in the database; may be incomplete.
      12 exhibition games, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Ruy Lopez (46) 
    C67 C80 C71 C84 C62
 Orthodox Defense (43) 
    D60 D63 D55 D53 D50
 Queen's Gambit Declined (25) 
    D31 D37 D06 D30
 French Defense (20) 
    C14 C13 C11 C12 C10
 Queen's Pawn Game (17) 
    D00 A40 D05 D02 D04
 French (12) 
    C13 C11 C12 C10 C00
With the Black pieces:
 Ruy Lopez (51) 
    C67 C65 C60 C79 C88
 Petrov (21) 
    C42 C43
 Queen's Pawn Game (14) 
    D00 D02 D04 A41
 Sicilian (13) 
    B73 B30 B32 B58 B72
 King's Gambit Declined (12) 
    C31 C32 C30
 Four Knights (11) 
    C49 C48
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Pillsbury vs Lasker, 1896 1-0
   Pillsbury vs Gunsberg, 1895 1-0
   Pillsbury vs Tarrasch, 1895 1-0
   Pillsbury vs Lasker, 1904 1-0
   Pillsbury vs Fernandez, 1900 1-0
   Lasker vs Pillsbury, 1895 0-1
   Pillsbury vs NN, 1899 1-0
   Pillsbury vs Maroczy, 1900 1-0
   Chigorin vs Pillsbury, 1895 0-1
   Pillsbury vs Burn, 1895 1-0

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Ideas by LaBourdonnaisdeux
   HNP: "A Genuis Ahead of His Time" by chocobonbon
   Vienna 1898 by suenteus po 147
   Pillsbury, the Extraordinary by StuporMundi
   Pillsbury winning on f5. by nikolaas
   London 1899 by suenteus po 147
   Monte Carlo 1903 by suenteus po 147
   Pillsbury miniatures. by CoryLetain
   Selected 19th century games II by atrifix
   Vienna 1903 by LaBourdonnaisdeux
   Pillsbury's Greatest Games by Kenkaku

GAMES ANNOTATED BY PILLSBURY: [what is this?]
   Schlechter vs Lasker, 1895
   Tarrasch vs Chigorin, 1895
   Janowski vs Steinitz, 1895
   Schiffers vs Chigorin, 1895
   Burn vs Lasker, 1895
   >> 18 GAMES ANNOTATED BY PILLSBURY

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Harry Nelson Pillsbury
Search Google® for Harry Nelson Pillsbury


HARRY NELSON PILLSBURY
(born Dec-05-1872, died Jun-17-1906) United States of America

[what is this?]
Harry Nelson Pillsbury was born December 5, 1872 in Somerville, Massachusetts. He learned to play chess at the age of sixteen, and he won his first major international tournament: Hastings 1895, finishing ahead of Mikhail Chigorin, Emanuel Lasker, Siegbert Tarrasch, and Wilhelm Steinitz, among others. For several years after he was a consistent top finisher in international events, placing =3rd at Nuremberg 1896, =1st at Vienna 1898, =2nd at London 1899 and clear second at Paris 1900.

In addition to chess, Pillsbury was also noted for his ability at checkers (draughts) (he ranked among the top twenty players in the United States at one time) and card games. Syphillis brought his chess career and his life to a premature end in 1906.


 page 1 of 18; games 1-25 of 436  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. J Barry vs Pillsbury 1-044 1889 Boston mC65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense
2. Steinitz vs Pillsbury 0-130 1892 BostonC30 King's Gambit Declined
3. Pillsbury vs J S Ryan  1-054 1893 3, New YorkB06 Robatsch
4. Lasker vs Pillsbury 1-055 1893 8, New YorkC60 Ruy Lopez
5. Pillsbury vs Marshall 0-134 1893 blind-simulD06 Queen's Gambit Declined
6. Pillsbury vs E Delmar 1-039 1893 1, New YorkD00 Queen's Pawn Game
7. Showalter vs Pillsbury  0-131 1893 5, New YorkC60 Ruy Lopez
8. Pillsbury vs Taubenhaus 1-030 1893 10, New YorkD00 Queen's Pawn Game
9. J C Halpern vs Pillsbury 0-167 1893 3, New YorkB30 Sicilian
10. Pillsbury vs F J Lee 0-160 1893 7, New YorkB01 Scandinavian
11. F Young vs Pillsbury 1-016 1893 BostonC62 Ruy Lopez, Old Steinitz Defense
12. Pillsbury vs L Schmidt 1-041 1893 5, New YorkD04 Queen's Pawn Game
13. Pillsbury vs N Jasnogrodsky 1-027 1893 9, New YorkD00 Queen's Pawn Game
14. Pillsbury vs D G Baird  1-032 1893 2, New YorkD00 Queen's Pawn Game
15. A Hodges vs Pillsbury  1-042 1893 7, New YorkC60 Ruy Lopez
16. Albin vs Pillsbury 1-061 1893 13, New YorkB73 Sicilian, Dragon, Classical
17. Pillsbury vs A Ettlinger 0-152 1893 4, New YorkC14 French, Classical
18. Albin vs Pillsbury  0-141 1893 9, New YorkD02 Queen's Pawn Game
19. J M Hanham vs Pillsbury  1-052 1893 2, New YorkC55 Two Knights Defense
20. Pillsbury vs J W Baird  1-053 1893 6, New YorkA83 Dutch, Staunton Gambit
21. Pillsbury vs Showalter 1-039 1893 12, New YorkC67 Ruy Lopez
22. E Delmar vs Pillsbury  1-025 1893 4, New YorkC46 Three Knights
23. Pillsbury vs J M Hanham 1-031 1893 8, New YorkD00 Queen's Pawn Game
24. Pillsbury vs Gossip 1-047 1893 1, New YorkC25 Vienna
25. E N Olly vs Pillsbury  0-145 1893 6, New YorkA01 Nimzovich-Larsen Attack
 page 1 of 18; games 1-25 of 436  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Pillsbury wins | Pillsbury loses  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 13 OF 13 ·  Later Kibitzing >
Mar-05-08   MichAdams: Huh? Where do you think Nimzowitsch got the notion of <prophylactics> from?
Mar-05-08   Voltaic: for him and for chess. i really find tragic the way he and consequently his chess deteriorated from a very high point where he could have been a rightful chess champion.
Mar-13-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Knight13: First place finisher in Hastings, 1895.

Hastings result (Based on 22 rounds, in order):

Pillsbury X 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 ˝ ˝ 1 1 1 1 1 1 ˝ 1 1 1 1 16˝

May-04-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: After about a year and a half, I have settled on C F Burille as the unknown kibitzer in the famous Lasker-Pillsbury picture from 1893. A comparision of Burille pictures is also in the album. You can see if you agree with my choice.

http://picasaweb.google.com/Caissa1...

May-16-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Knight13: Chessmetrics Player Profile: Harry Pillsbury
Born: 1872-Dec
Died: 1906-Jun

Best World Rank: #1 (16 different months between the January 1903 rating list and the April 1904 rating list )

Highest Rating: 2816 on the July 1901 rating list, #2 in world, age 28y7m

Best Individual Performance: 2826 in Vienna, 1898, scoring 28/39 (72%) vs 2649-rated opposition

May-26-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  brankat: <Calli> Regarding the famous photo. There is W.Steinitz kibitzing there, too :-)
Aug-23-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Karpova: Pen-portrait (London tournament, 1899):

<Pillsbury is a slim young man with lively, intelligent eyes, and a pale, clean-shaven face which has a sad, resigned air, as if chess were an extremely painful task for him.>

Source: "La Stratégie", 15 July 1899

Edward Winter's article "London, 1899 Pen-portraits": http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

Dec-05-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  brankat: Born on Dec/05, 136 years ago. Yet, he seems to be forever young!

R.I.P. master Harry Nelson.

Jan-20-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Karpova: Irving Chernev: <Pillsbury was the first master to realize that combinations directed at the opponent’s king were affected by conditions outside of that immediate area.>

From page 124 of "Combinations The Heart of Chess" by I. Chernev (New York, 1960). Source: C.N. 5960
Link: http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

This is just the first sentence of that quote.

Jun-08-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: Pillsbury in the Press, a collection of clippings from contemporary sources: http://picasaweb.google.com/Caissa1...

The first slide is an interesting interview which you must zoom via the magnifier button in the upper right corner in order to read.

Jun-08-09   visayanbraindoctor: Poor Pillsbury. He is always associated with a sexually transmitted disease.

Below are better epitaphs:

<Helloween>: "I can see it now "Behind the Music: Harry Nelson Pillsbury" on VH1. Then after you lure the kids in with pictures of him smoking blunts of cheeba in the commercials, you reveal to them that he was a chess master who could memorize long lists of words forwards and backwards while playing a 30 person blindfold simul!"

<keypusher>: "From Cheshire's bio of Pillsbury in the Hastings tournament book:

22 at the time of the tournament, Pillsbury was born on December 5, 1872 at Somerville, Massachusetts, U.S.A. He was educated for a commercial career, and did not make a study of the game until five years ago.

Mr. Pillsbury is decidedly pleasant and unassuming in manner, and a perfect type of American and a tremendous smoker. He is remarkably self-composed, and sits at the chess table in a comfortable smile and with a self confident look on his face.

His style of play is energetic, free from fads, and correct; while looking carefully after his defenses, he is always pressing forward for chances to win, which he is very quick to detect. The openings are thoroughly known, and in the middlegame his fearless maneuvers are superb.

His chief successes are:

1890. He beat Steinitz, receiving pawn and move.
1890. He beat H.N. Stone by 5 to 2.
1893. He beat Walbrodt.
1893. He beat Schottlander.
1893. He won first prize, New York City Chess Club.
1895. He won first prize, Hastings."

There is no doubt that Pillsbury is the greatest American-born chessplayer right after the Morphy era. Not until Fine came along did an American come close to being a serious Challenger who would have some chances to win the Title. (I don't think Marshall ever came close to besting Lasker, but Pillsbury would have more realistic chances; although I still think Lasker would have beaten Pillsbury by a close margin.) I would regard the 4 strongest American-born chessplayers, by temporal order, as Morphy, Pillsbury, Fine, and Fischer.

Jun-08-09   James Demery: Anyone that can beat Lasker 5 games out of 10(draws not counting) has to be a tremendous player. When Pillsbury died I understand Lasker was quoted as saying "A genius has left us."
Jun-09-09   docR: agree, pillsbury greatness is often underestimated. we tend to reward the very good for a long time, think robert parrish,greg maddux, emmitt smith over the shorter meteoric careers of gayle sayers, jr richard. etc
Jun-12-09   drnooo: It is not impossible that Pillsbury might have been the best player ever in America, now or then. We will never know. To have picked the game up at 16 and do what he did was incredible. Probably the nod should still go to Morphy, then Pillsbury, and only then Fischer, talent wise. All three had remarkable minds, but my hunch is had Pillsbury tuned and trained his sights on chess, he might have outclassed even the other two. Fischer homed in exclusively on the 64 squares, it seems they were a mere way station for Pillsbury. Odd the quote by Lasker though: I have known many chessplayers, and one chess genius. Capablanca. He seemed to forget just how great Pillsbury was, and what he said about him, unless he was merely stating the obvious that Pillsbury certainly by defintion was just your standard ho hum genius. He almost certainly meant chess genius , look at the record against each other.
Jun-12-09   Petrosianic: <It is not impossible that Pillsbury might have been the best player ever in America, now or then.>

A lot of things are possible. It's easier to tell what's proven. Morphy and Fischer each proved themselves to be the best player in the world at a given time. Pillsbury never did. Could he have? Possibly. So possibly could a lot of other players who never did. That's one reason the world title means so much. There are a lot of REALLY good players who never got it.

Whether he was or he wasn't, it shouldn't stop you from enjoying his games, though.

Jul-31-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: There was a strong Master from Boston who gave Pillsbury fits. I don't remember his name. (maybe someone can fill in the gap) The story goes that Pillsbury was playing someone at a club who did not know how to play the game all that well, but he was beating Pillsbury, who kept hearing: tap-tap-tap during these games. Pillsbury was mystified as to how a complete beginner was doing this to him. And all through out, he kept hearing that infernal: tap-tap-tap noise. Finally he had had enough, and he looked under the table and noticed a hand holding some keys about to tap again. It was the Boston Master who was seated at a nearby table. It turns out that the guy Pillsbury was playing, was a Telegraph operator, and the Master was using Morse code to send him the moves. I remember reading the above story in Chess Life magazine many years ago. Perhaps someone like <Calli> who knows it better, I'm sure, can provide better detail to the story.
Jul-31-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  percyblakeney: <There was a strong Master from Boston>

Sounds like a good first line for a limerick :-)

Jul-31-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <Percyblakeney> There once was a man from Nantucket... :-)
Jul-31-09   myschkin: . . .

.... . .-. . -.-. .... .- -.-. .... ---

Constant Ferdinand Burille

http://www.chessville.com/misc/Hist...

. -. .--- --- -.--

Jul-31-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <myschkin> Thanks!
Jul-31-09   myschkin: :)

-.-- .- .-. . .-- . .-.. -.-. --- -- .

Jul-31-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: .... .. .-.. .- .-. .. --- ..- ...
Aug-02-09   kurtrichards: A form of an early cheating, <chancho>? The morse code was utilized for cheating...hmmm...
Aug-02-09   Pawn Ambush: <myschkin>

- .... .- -. -.- ... / ..-. --- .-. / ... .... --- .-- .. -. --. / -- . / - .... .. ... / .- -. -.. / .. -. / .-. . ..-. . .-. . -. -.-. . / - --- / - .... . / .- ... .- / .... --- ..-. ..-. -- .- -. / .--. --- ... - / -.-- . ... / .. / .--. .-.. .- -.-- / -... .. --. / ..-. .. ... .... / .-. . --. ..- .-.. .- .-. .-.. -.--

Aug-02-09   myschkin: <pawn ambush>

-.-. .... .- .--. . .- ..- / -... ..- -.. -.. -.-- /---... / -.--.-

PS: I quit my morse career to start fishing, too!

greetings to NY

Jump directly to page #    (enter number from 1 to 13)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 13 OF 13 ·  Later Kibitzing >
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | new kibitzing | chessforums | new games | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2009, Chessgames.com
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies