chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Judit Polgar vs Viswanathan Anand
FIDE World Championship Tournament (2005), San Luis ARG, Sep-28
Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation (B17)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 18 times; par: 58 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 55 more Judit Polgar/Anand games
sac: 34...Nc3+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can make these tips go away by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Simply check the option "Don't show random tips on game pages." and click the Update Profile button at the bottom.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Judit Polgar vs Viswanathan Anand (2005)
Photograph copyright © 2005 World Chess Championship Press.  Used with permission.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 62 OF 62 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-02-05  thathwamasi: <offramp> Sorry if u misunderstood me that I am trying to underrate aussies. I infact admire the spirit of aussies. Its just that, I regret that they never produced a chess player to play with the likes of the guys who are playing in san luis. Infact, when I met steven waugh in Chennai, in 2001, I told him "for ur kinda composure, had u taken up chess, it would have been a tough challenge for kaspy"...lol and he as usual gave a saintly smile....
Oct-03-05  Averageguy: Good finish by Anand.
Oct-04-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  BishopBerkeley: <thathwamasi>, <Benzol>, & <offramp>

And now, two newly-minted Australian Nobel Laureates in Medicine take their places alongside those mentioned above in the pantheon of intellectual achievement from "down under":

http://nobelprize.org/medicine/laur...

<offramp> Just a bit of a tweak on your light-speed number...

Speed of Light =
(approx.) 186,000 miles/second

186K m/s * 3600 seconds/hour
= 669,600,000 miles/hour (approx.)

Even so, for many practical purposes, your estimate would be quite good (notwithstanding the fact that it exceeds the velocity-ceiling that Albert Einstein bumped his head on.)

<thathwamasi> If I may ask respectfully, I wonder if your name here at this fine site is a version of the sublime two-part Sanskrit utterance often rendered in English as

Aham Brahmasi

Tattvamasi ?

I believe this esoteric pair originate in the Upanishads, one of the sacred writings of the Hindu tradition (specifically, the Brhadaranyaka and the Chandogya Upanishads, if memory serves). They are sometimes "translated"

I am Brahman (the Supreme Self)

and

Thou art Brahman.

Though I'm sure there are many meanings associated with these utterances, I have always interpreted them to refer to the identity-yet-distinctness of the individual "smaller" self with the Collective Universal "Supreme Self" (Paramatman) spoken of by philosophers from many different traditions.

Thank you!

(: ♗ Bishop Berkeley ♗ :)

Incidentally, longtime friends Albert Einstein and Dr. Emanuel Lasker exchanged some interesting thoughts about the speed of light:

http://www.geocities.com/siliconval...

From Einstein's forward to Dr. Lasker's biography:

...Now I must justify myself because I never considered in detail, either in writing or in our conversations, Emanuel Lasker's critical essay on the theory of relativity. It is indeed necessary for me to say something about it here because even in his biography, which is focused on the purely human aspects, the passage which discusses the essay contains something resembling a slight reproach. Lasker's keen analytical mind had immediately clearly recognized that the central point of the whole question is that the velocity of light (in a vacuum) is a constant. It was evident to him that, if this constancy were admitted, the relative of time could not be avoided. So what was there to do? He tried to do what Alexnder, whom historians have dubbed "the Great," did when he cut the Gordian knot. Lasker's attempted solution was based on the following idea: "Nobody has any immediate knowledge of how quickly light is transmitted in a complete vacuum, for even in interstellar space there is always a minimal quantity of matter present under all circimstances and what holds there is even more applicable to the most complete vacuum created by man to the best of his ability. Therefore, who has the right to deny that its velocity in a really complete vacuum is infinite?"

Oct-05-05  visceral infestation: It's good to see the Caro-Kann alive
Oct-06-05  Drifter: Chess isn't very big here in Australia.
Oct-06-05  schnarre: Nice game by Anand!

Seems 5. Ng5 is no longer in vogue vs 4...Nd7 (I could well be mistaken, but I have not seen it of late).

Oct-06-05  Flyboy216: Can anyone explain why Anand didn't play 36...b2? My Crafty immediately gives it a -23 eval as opposed to the text move, which it thinks is much weaker (but still overwhelmingly winning)?

I've seen lots of examples of this in GM games. Perhaps when a SuperGM knows he's winning, it doesn't really matter to him which of these moves he chooses.

Oct-07-05  PaulLovric: aussies and chess. hmmmmmmmm
Oct-08-05  petercoti: who's going to win
Oct-11-05  schnarre: <Flyboy216> 36...b2 allows the White King room to maneuver out (possibly claiming the Black Bishop doing so), & draw out the game longer. Keeping the b pawn where it is locks in the King for the following finish.
Oct-14-05  visceral infestation: Ian Rogers is a very exciting Aussie chess player.
Oct-14-05  schnarre: <visceral infestation> Seen any games of his in the database?
Oct-31-05  visceral infestation: Sometimes his name is "Rodgers" he's in there.
Nov-01-05  schnarre: <visceral infestation>Thanks!
Nov-09-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: Judit Polgar gets outplayed early in the opening and makes a serious positional error with 14. Qc2?! (better was 14. 0-0 =), allowing Anand to double and isolate the Kingside pawns, which facilitates Black's attempt to build up a decisive attack.

Anand's 17...b5! initiates the attack to weaken and overwhelm White's Queenside castled position. Note that White cannot win a pawn here as 17...b5! 18. axb5 cxb5 19. Bxb5? Nxe3 20. fxe3 Qxb5 allows Black to win a piece with a discovered attack.

White cannot get away with pawn grabbing with 25. Bxb5?, since 25...Nxc3 26. bxc3 a6 using the fork and the pin to open up the Queenside castled position is winning for Black.

GM Shipov notes in analysis at http://www.chesspro.ru/events/sanlu... that 27...Qf7! is an outstanding defensive and positional attacking move, beginning a shift of the Queen to the opposite wing to support an attack on the King.

Polgar's 30. Bg5?! is a weak move (putting up more resistance is 30. Qd3!) that makes Black's winning attack on the King much easier after 30...b4! 31. c3 b3! . However to be fair, GM Shipov indicates that with perfect play, Black wins even after the better alternative 30. Qd3!

Anand's deflection sacrifice 34...Nc3+! is a pseudo-sacrifice which gives up the Knight to demolish White's pawn structure to facilitate the attack on the exposed castled King.

Jan-02-06  thathwamasi: <bishop berkeley> : I am sorry for this rather belated reply. You are correct. My nick is derived from the vedic coinage of 'thathwamasi'. Which talks about the greatness of the advaita philosophy.
Mar-29-06  JYMMI: I SUGEST 3_... dxe 4_Nxe Bf5 5_Ng3 Bg6
Mar-30-06  Warrush: AH! Its good to see Anand playing my favorite opening and favorite opening line.
Aug-12-06  notyetagm: This is really a well-played game by Anand.
Jun-30-14  SpiritedReposte: Masterful play. Karpov/Capa-like. Anand creates those doubled c-pawns, opens some queenside files, stops to defend the king for a second and viola it's a wrap.
Jul-02-15  Harsha Bellur: After 29. Bc2 Anand could have played f5! and sealed the fate of White's Bishop instead blundered with 29...Qb7???
Nov-07-15  SpiritedReposte: Looks like it doesn't quite do the trick as white has Qd3 buying time with the mate threat. Anand no doubt saw this.
Dec-22-18  nummerzwei: <SpiritedReposte: Masterful play. Karpov/Capa-like.>

Also Rubinstein. This game, discussed by Vukovic in 'The Art of Attack in Chess', comes to mind:

P F Johner vs Rubinstein, 1922


click for larger view

Against passive play, White quickly develops an attack with 12.Rdg1, 13.g4, 14.h4 and 15.g5. In contrast, after Rubinstein's 11...Bg4 12.h3 Bxf3 13.gxf3


click for larger view

all White has is doubling against g7. As Vukovic points out, g7 is not weak and can easily be defended by Black. Later in the game, Rubinstein consolidated his castled position with


click for larger view

19...Kh8 20.Rg4 Rg8

and set up a lethal counterattack on the queenside.

Funnily, the Anand game appears in a book called 'The Art of Attacking Chess' (London, 2008). It's by Zenon Franco and quite good.

Dec-22-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: I was looking for the killer finish that finally induced Pulgar to resign but according to SF there isn't any, although black has a big advantage:

1) -8.67 (22 ply) 42.Re1 Rgd8 43.Re2 Bb2 44.Rd2 Rxd3 and it drags on for at least 18 more moves.

Dec-22-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: Whoops, Polgar not Pulgar!
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 62)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 62 OF 62 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Minority storm
from PositionalBomber's Caro-Kann tutorial by PositionalBomber
AdrianP's Bookmarked Games (2005)
by AdrianP
Anand wins impressively!
from World Championship in Chess, 2005, San Luis, Arg by arielbekarov
Caro-Kann Def. Karpov Variation (B17) 0-1 Deflection sacrifice
from C-K Def Collected by Fredthebear by fredthebear
Caro-Kann Def. Karpov Variation (B17) 0-1 Deflection sacrifice
from yDiagonals Attack: Bs Highway, Battery, Crossfir by fredthebear
Anand Smashing Polgar
from Nice games and Masterpieces by Queens Gambit
Beautiful game by Anand......
from VishyFan's favorite games by VishyFan
WCC 1
from Anand! by larrewl
Caro-Kann Openings
by KFitzgerald
Caro-Kann : Move by Move
by jakaiden
lazintata's misc
by lazintata
Anand's rook endgames
by setuhanu01
Caro-Kann : Move by Move
by hakkepof
Art of War's favorite games
by Art of War


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC