Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Peter K Wells vs Alexey Shirov
Gibtelecom Chess Festival (2006), Gibraltar, rd 6, Jan-29
Trompowsky Attack: General (A45)  ·  1-0


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 59 times; par: 17 [what's this?]

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more P K Wells/Shirov game
sac: 10.Ne2 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can make these tips go away by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Simply check the option "Don't show random tips on game pages." and click the Update Profile button at the bottom.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Nov-18-11  DrMAL: <King Death> BTW in Dembo book which I decided to get, it states (p.28) "6...Bh6! The tactical point behind this critical move will become clear in a moment." For <Life MORON AJ> this may be moment of eternity! LOL. Thanx <SWT> for pointing out book it also has excellent suggestions elsewhere, cheers.
Nov-18-11  LIFE Master AJ: To repeat the obvious ... since some people obviously cannot grasp plain English ... ... ...

ANY CHESS ENGINE ... pick one ... will choose the vastly superior and certainly more logical move of 6...Bg7!; over the comparitively weaker 6...Bh6.

You are welcome to fire up your own chess engine and try this yourself ... also, any amount of DPA's, sliding, etc, will also verify that 6...Bg7! is absolutely the best move. It also avoids all of the difficulties that Black gets himself into in this game ... problems - that even a GM of Shirov's caliber - could not overcome.

QED / END OF LINE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Nov-18-11  SimonWebbsTiger: A completely useless and pathetic comment from AJ, as per usual.

The whole point is 6...Bg7 is the more respected main line in this branch of the Tromp. It was because of games like Hodgson-v.d.Wiel 1994 and this one that 6...Bh6 had been ignored.

That was until Yelena Dembo, a Greek ELO 2450+ women GM and male IM player - vastly stronger in playing strength, international experience and written work than AJ; ie. a proper Master, unlike that Florida patzer - had published an interesting book on Anti-King's Indian openings repertoire book for black in 2009. (There is an earlier book covering the same topic, but suggesting some different lines, by Joe Gallagher, so both books provide the KID player with anything he would want versus the anti-KIDS.)

6...Bh6!? is worthy of more testing. Will it be refuted? Quite possibly. That is how opening theory develops.

GM Richard Palliser - someone else who is a real Master and vastly stronger than AJ - commented that the line is interesting and worthy of tests.

I bet the IM and GM are so unprofessional that they don't own engines or know how to use them. ;o)

AJ should play with his toys and leave the grown ups to talk chess.

Nov-18-11  Nemesistic: I dont see much wrong with 6..Bh6 personally but im a mere patzer! Maybe g7 is better,but i sure as hell don't need to let my Computer work it out for me,then argue with all who disagree <lifemasterbj>
Nov-18-11  SimonWebbsTiger: @<Nemesistic>

the logic of 6...Bh6 and after is this:

Black wishes to prove b2 a weakness. White can sac the exchange, though, and trap the black queen on a1, because trying to run home runs into the extremely strong point 12. d6! Black is forced to play 11...d6 to survive; 12. Qd2 from white next. The question becomes one of whether white ends up materially or positionally ahead. It isn't clear -- things get very tactical.

If it turns out black is plain better, then white's 6. c4 must be dropped for the older 6. g3.

AJ has no clue about the intricacies of this.

Nov-18-11  King Death: While I don't have a chess engine, in reading some remarks <DrMAL> has made, those engines don't seem to do as well in early opening positions with large "trees", as Kotov called them.

Is it possible that <AJ> has put his findings here without thinking, just aping what his wonderful engine tells him? If that's the way it goes, I have a hard time imagining him playing a game where it's just him and the other guy, no engines allowed.

Nov-19-11  King Death: < Annie K.: <> FWIW, I also agree with <twinlark>, <Ohio>, etc. - the Bandar-log, uh, I mean the obsessive anti-AJ troop, needs to be dealt with, and not just followed around and retroactively cleaned up after. A nice two-week vacation upon continued acts of vandalism sounds about right - that way they could be back in time for most of the Clue Hunt... ;)>

This post ignores some realities that are obvious to me in just my short time here. You (and others) seem to have this opinion that <AJ> is a misunderstood creature who never says or does anything wrong and that "The Troop" follows him everywhere and will attack him at the drop of a hat. I won't say that the behavior of "The Troop" is perfect, but don't be in too much of a hurry to be an enabler as AJ plays his victim card. If you refer to actions of "The Troop" as vandalism, what would you call AJ's repeated abuse of others over the smallest hint of any suggestion that he's less than perfect? I've read some of the stuff he's put out there over the years and it's pretty ugly. If he ever said anything like that to me face to face, I'd put him in his place, and fast. I don't think he would though. He seems like a perfect bully but only when everything is his way.

Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: It is silly to just say "the engines don't like that move, therefore it's weak - Q.E.D." (to paraphrase A.J.'s remarks). Don't believe me? Just look at A.J.'s comments at to his 21st move in A J Goldsby vs R Aeria, 2000:

<21.Nf5+!!, (Maybe - '!!!/!!!!') ...

This is easily one of the most profound moves I have ever played. It is also one of the most surprising.

As a test, I offered this position to several strong computer programs. I set each to search 3 nodes, set the hash tables to 25 MB, and then let them crank. At least five of them did not list this move in their top three move choices after exactly seven minutes of analysis. (Seven minutes being the limit set by expert programmers for the average program, running on a Pentium III, to find even the most astounding and amazing moves from known brilliancies.)

This was true right after the game ... it may NOT be true as the over-all technology of computers and the associated chess programs continually advance!> (parentheses around last sentence omitted)

I realize that, as AJ says, chess engines are even stronger today than they were in 2000, but they were plenty strong then. Deep Blue won its match against reigning World Champion Kasparov in 1997.

So if it's possible for a move that A.J. played to be better than that recommended by the engines, it's also possible that a move that various GMs and IMs have played is better than that recommended by the engines. It may or may not be, but just turning off your brain because of what the computer says is a bad idea.

Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: The really wonderfully ironic thing is that AJ himself repeatedly makes this (trivial) point, that computers do not necessarily present you with the absolute truth, in his own notes to.... <this game>!

You couldn't make it up.

Nov-19-11  King Death: <acirce> But the only truth is truth as presented by <AJ>.

<FSR> That's right. I've heard a term used called "suspension of reality" and what AJ seems to ignore (if he even understands it) is that it's a bad idea to let others do all your thinking for you. We were given a brain and free will, so why not use them?

Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <acirce> Remarkable find you made there. A.J. writes of 9.Qxf4!?, the move Wells played, and which led to Shirov's resignation just four moves later,

<Fritz 12 says this is no good and it (now) shows the evaluation of ... "Black is winning.">

And yet now A.J. evidently thinks that Fritz 12 (an engine!) is wrong and Wells (a human!) is right. How is that possible? Apparently engines are infallible when they agree with A.J.'s opinion, but highly fallible when they do not.

Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <SimonWebbsTiger> Very true. I've never met, nor exchanged e-mails with, nor talked with, nor Facebook friended, etc. any other member of "the troop." I have no idea what any of them look like. Nor, to my knowledge, has the membership of "the troop" ever been defined. It must vary from time to time, and tends to increase, since the number of people A.J. has insulted is constantly increasing.
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <BanLMAJ: ... There IS NO TROOP once again AJ who has HIMSELF CREATED SO MANY ENEMIES, lumps them all in a group. Fact is, most EVERYONE who comes in contact with AJ turns into his enemy, the only thing one can do to prevent this is to WORSHIP HIM NO MATTER WHAT MISTAKES HE MAKES. If one tries to HELP HIM or SIMPLY OFFER TRUTH, one is an idiot, a spammer, an enemy and a member of some troop.>

Truer words were never written. To the last sentence one could add "and a sockpuppet."

Nov-19-11  LIFE Master AJ: Ron: (e-mail)

#1.) Most of "the troop" ... for all of their spoutings ... don't really even begin to grasp chess. [Most are nothing than lower-rated players who cannot begin to play (or analyze!) if you take their PC engines away from them.]

#2.) As you pointed out, Black need not clear the long diagonal, if he was going to play his Bishop to h6. As you pointed out, 5...f5; is unnecessary; Black should make some other move, or play ...Bh6 immediately.

Nov-19-11  King Death: <LIFE Master AJ:

#1.) Most of "the troop" ... for all of their spoutings ... don't really even begin to grasp chess. [Most are nothing than lower-rated players who cannot begin to play (or analyze!) if you take their PC engines away from them.] >

This is a pretty good self-description by our man. Look in the mirror much?

Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: <LMAJ> Come on, this is just sad. Nobody believes in these fictitious e-mails you pretend that people send you. Why are you even trying?
Nov-22-11  SimonWebbsTiger: it goes without saying that 5...Bh6 6. e3 f5 doesn't require white to play 7. c4.

5...f5 6. g3 is an old main line, as is 5...f5 6. c4 Bg7.

Feb-02-12  LIFE Master AJ:

<<AJ !! if i knew you had a channel ida subbed ages ago .. not been on chessgames d ot c om for months (was slumming on there for too long at a time so i just stick to youtube + blogs + an openings expl but i enjoyed yr kibitzing, was /is a valuable asset /feature of the site to my mind, usually followed it w/ my set - i noticed SeanGodley cited you a while bac in one of his immaculate commentaries, some advanced analysis you'd done on a Fischer game

look forward to checking out yr chl properly>>

E-mail: <<Bst chanl on YT>>

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <DrMAL: <mworld> Everyone (with very few exceptions) makes mistakes, it is much less usual at top level but either way I don't particularly revel in this fact of life....>

Can't agree more with this; if I ever return to serious play, maybe I can make a few less than before!

<....It is human creativity that makes high level chess so fascinating to me....>

Here's to the human element in OTB play, anyway. Correspondence chess is largely dead, unless one wishes to pit one's software against that of another.

Apr-17-14  Rookiepawn: Bad thing about engines is they killed correspondence chess. A referee would be needed on each side during analysis period to watch and prevent players from resourcing to engines.

Not only each referee would have to live with each player, imagine also how boring could it be just watching a guy thinking a single move.

Another idea could be some sort of Big Brother style reality show, with players exposing their life in public during the correspondence game, that would prevent the use of engines.

Just my two (fake) cents.

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Black's giblets were hung out to dry on a gibbet.
Oct-22-14  Ke2: <If you guys really want something to laugh about you must check out LifeMaster AJ's own annotations on his game with someone called Rick Aeria on this site! He gives one move (An untaken Knight sac!) 3/4 Exclams ?? (You decide!) and claims the man next to him "Partially" fell from his chair! Iv played sounder sacs in 3 min Blitz,but for comedic value its a MUST READ> lolololoolol
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: I looked at that tournament where AJ played <Rick> Aeria. The guy's name is not <Rick>, but Ulric Everard Aeria.

His rating was 2058 in 2000.

His last tournament (as listed in the USCF) was in 2011.

Rating 2054.

Jul-21-15  dumbgai: <Rookiepawn: Bad thing about engines is they killed correspondence chess.>

Good riddance.

Apr-02-16  mikealando: Oh my. 13 moves Shirov.(??) Chess is never short of surprises. There's still room at the top guys. Hahaha. Correspondence Chess. I find it difficult even trusting online opponents.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 5)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Shirov loses in 13 moves!
from Great players lose miniatures by FSR
Trompowsky Attack: Shirov lost it in 13 moves!
from 98_A45 - Trompowski trumps by whiteshark
Peter K Wells (1965-)
from PLayer of the day:notable game II by nikolaas
from Tromp Attack. by PinkLedDoor
from Arjun Parameswaran's favorite games by Arjun Parameswaran
wild queen play
from helium's favorite games by helium
from attacking masterpieces & related by JustAnotherPatzer
Game 1
from The art of planning in chess by diegoami
Game 1
from Art of Planning (McDonald) by howardb86
Game collection: 5
by ph2ca
Tony's favorite games
by LWCrunner05
Trompowsky, 2...c5
by KingG
Tromp beats World Class GM in 13 moves - just for fun.
from How to play the Trompowsky Attack. by NimzoKing
13 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection I by wwall
Game collection: 1
by vica
Trompowsky Attack: Shirov lost it in 13 moves!
from iking's GOTD collection by iking
Never underestimate your opponent.
from DanielBryant's favorite games by DanielBryant
Game 1
from Art of Planning (McDonald) by Qindarka
Off Base - Starting on page 2 (2 November 2011)
from Apocalypse now - Chess, Controversy and charges by Karpova
webskak2's favorite games
by webskak2
plus 10 more collections (not shown)

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC