chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Viswanathan Anand vs Alexey Shirov
Grand Slam Chess Final (2010), Bilbao ESP, rd 4, Oct-13
French Defense: McCutcheon. Lasker Variation (C12)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 92 more Anand/Shirov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-13-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Fire on booooored!
Oct-13-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  ketchuplover: tough crowd
Oct-13-10  messachess: I liked this game (I have so much trouble against the French--but, don't see it much.) It looked like Shirov's style, meaning it looked risky. If you're a Shirov fan, you kind of hold your breath in a game like this. You wonder, can he pull it off? Does he see things sufficiently? This time he did, at least for a draw against the best.
Oct-13-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: Anand was so close to a win here.
Oct-13-10  Marmot PFL: If 33...Rc8 its not so easy for white to draw. Black was short of time though (as usual).
Oct-13-10  Marmot PFL: Edouard analyzes Rc8 to a draw - <33...Rc8!? 34.h6 c2 35.Qg3+ e5 36.Qa3+ Ke6 37.Qc1 and White holds thanks to the following idea: 37...Qc3 38.h7 Qxa1 39.Rh6+ Phew! 39...Kf5 40.Qxa1 c1Q+ 41.Qxc1 Rxc1+ 42.Kh2 Rc8 43.h8Q Rxh8 44.Rxh8 ; 33...Rh6 34.Rh3 c2 35.Qg3+ Ke7 36.Qa3+ Ke8 37.Rf1 with counterplay.>

23 h6 should have been winning for white, and 28 Qg7? was just a lost tempo.

Oct-13-10  Eyal: Yeah, the one who mainly missed opportunities here was Anand - 23.h6!! (on move 25 as well) was winning; 28.Nf7+ with the black queen still on a5 was significantly better, as well as 29.Qg3 (see analysis on http://www.chessbase.com/news/2010/...).
Oct-13-10  ounos: 18. ...Rh8! is nice, I guess that's still in book, right?
Oct-13-10  wanabe2000: The Chessgames Data Base shows 14.Nxd4 as played here. Seems like 14.h4 is a novelty. MCO has a similar position through 10 moves when 11.h4 Qa5 12.h5 g5 13.f4? cxd4 14.Nf3 dxc3+ 15.Ke2 Qa4! was played. (Seirawan-Makarychev, Reykjavik 1990). Anand appears to have improved on this game.

Fischer also tried White's Qf4 move before h4 was played. See Fischer vs Rossolimo, 1965

Oct-13-10  visayanbraindoctor: <Eyal: Yeah, the one who mainly missed opportunities here was Anand - 23.h6!! (on move 25 as well) was winning; 28.Nf7+ with the black queen still on a5 was significantly better, as well as 29.Qg3>

This is one really messy game. Anand's fans will have to forgive him for understandably missing those computer-like moves. It was also great for gutsy Shirov to take up the fight to the World Champion.

Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Quite astonishing how new ideas keep manifesting themselves in such old variations. 14.h4 is indeed new, if the database is correct, and very brave--letting that d4 pawn live was risky. For myself, the big question is why didn't Anand capture an entire Rook with 19.Nf6+,Ke7; 20.Qxh8. Can Black really conjure a perpetual or more with 20...Qxc3+; 21.Ke2,Nxd3; 22.cxd3,Qc2+?
Oct-14-10  Eyal: 14.h5 (not h4) may have surprised Shirov, but it's actually not a novelty (though it hasn't been played before on the highest levels). Fuller databases than the one of CG.com have 18...Rh8 as the first new move - 18...dxc3? was played before, and 18...Qxc3+! is apparently the most accurate in this crazy position. (http://chessok.com/broadcast/?key=b...)
Oct-14-10  Eyal: <For myself, the big question is why didn't Anand capture an entire Rook with 19.Nf6+,Ke7; 20.Qxh8. Can Black really conjure a perpetual or more with 20...Qxc3+; 21.Ke2,Nxd3; 22.cxd3,Qc2+?>

Black is actually winning in this line - he's a rook up after 22...Qb2+! followed by Qxa1+ & Qxh1.

Oct-14-10  Sacsacmate: GM Romain Edouard analysis:

<28.Qg7?? Crazy move! Losing an exceedingly important tempo. Difficult to know what Anand missed. 28.Nf7+ Rxf7 29.Qxf7 Qa4 would be a totally different story, as it would be White to move! And for instance, after 30.Kf1 Qc2 (30...Qd4 31.Qf3 Bb5 32.Rh3 c2 33.Rc1 Qb2 34.Qf4+ e5 35.Qd2 ) 31.Qf4+! Kc6 32.h6 White should win.>

Oct-14-10  whiteshark: When Anand played 14.h5 I thought it's already over.
Oct-14-10  pferd: <visayanbraindoctor:
This is one really messy game. Anand's fans will have to forgive him for understandably missing those computer-like moves. [23.h6]>

I don't think 23.h6 is a computer move - just a good move. On a different day, or with longer time control, Anand (or Kasparov or Fischer) would have found it.

Oct-14-10  Eyal: Btw, Anand's missing h6 may be related to his being under the impression that he was winning by force another way. He said in the press conference that after 26.Ne5 f6:


click for larger view

he was counting on 27.Nc4+ Kc5 28.Qe3+ d4 29.Qf4, but then noticed that Black can save himself by 29...e5! (30.Qxf6 Qc7).

Oct-15-10  Eric Farley: This game shows for the nth time that Anand is a mediocre player. Any endgame expert (Capa, Lasker, Rubinstein, Petrosian) would have won.
Oct-15-10  crazybird: <Eric Farley> Your interesting comment reminded me of a quote i have always liked.

"Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself; but talent instantly recognizes genius"

Oct-17-10  SharpAttack: <crazybird> Nice quote! Great response to the poor comment above.
Nov-24-10  dadas71: anand is great mastes.
Apr-06-11  morfishine: <23.Nxd5+> needs to be explored as a possible improvement
Apr-06-11  sevenseaman: < morfishine: <23.Nxd5+> needs to be explored as a possible improvement> Terrific! The only viable response is 23...Kf8 and 24. Qe5 creates more problems for Black, insoluble!

And insightful! All moves by Anand hereafter look a bit stilted. He could thank Shirov for going perp.

Apr-06-11  sevenseaman: Anand generally is brilliant in his endgame play.

Notwithstanding <crazybird>'s intimidating quote, if confined to this game, I think <Eric Farley> comment is apt and fair.

Nov-17-12  wordfunph: "Perhaps I should have played positionally but I was looking for forced lines too much. If you miss one move, you get punished."

- Vishy Anand

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC