chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆 Kings Tournament (2013)

  PARTICIPANTS (sorted by highest achieved rating; click on name to see player's games)
Fabiano Caruana, Teimour Radjabov, Ruslan Ponomariov, Hao Wang, Liviu-Dieter Nisipeanu

Chessgames.com Chess Event Description
Kings Tournament (2013)

The 7th Romgaz Kings Tournament was a double round robin played in Bucharest, Romania 7-16 October 2013. Official site: http://www.turneulregilor.com/index.... Photo of winner: http://yelenadembo.com/wp-content/u.... Crosstable:

1 Caruana ** ½0 1½ 1½ ½1 5 2 Wang Hao ½1 ** 0½ ½½ ½1 4½ 3 Nisipeanu 0½ 1½ ** ½½ ½½ 4 4 Radjabov 0½ ½½ ½½ ** ½½ 3½ 5 Ponomariov ½0 ½0 ½½ ½½ ** 3

Previous event: Kings' Tournament (2012).

 page 1 of 1; 20 games  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Radjabov vs Ponomariov ½-½312013Kings TournamentD43 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
2. Nisipeanu vs Caruana 0-1572013Kings TournamentD90 Grunfeld
3. Ponomariov vs Nisipeanu  ½-½362013Kings TournamentC42 Petrov Defense
4. H Wang vs Radjabov  ½-½362013Kings TournamentD32 Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch
5. Nisipeanu vs H Wang 1-0422013Kings TournamentE47 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 O-O 5.Bd3
6. Caruana vs Ponomariov  ½-½412013Kings TournamentC42 Petrov Defense
7. H Wang vs Caruana ½-½472013Kings TournamentD85 Grunfeld
8. Radjabov vs Nisipeanu  ½-½1162013Kings TournamentE32 Nimzo-Indian, Classical
9. Caruana vs Radjabov 1-0302013Kings TournamentB30 Sicilian
10. Ponomariov vs H Wang  ½-½472013Kings TournamentC42 Petrov Defense
11. Ponomariov vs Radjabov  ½-½542013Kings TournamentB30 Sicilian
12. Caruana vs Nisipeanu  ½-½442013Kings TournamentD30 Queen's Gambit Declined
13. Radjabov vs H Wang  ½-½462013Kings TournamentD10 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
14. Nisipeanu vs Ponomariov  ½-½522013Kings TournamentE59 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3, Main line
15. H Wang vs Nisipeanu  ½-½302013Kings TournamentC42 Petrov Defense
16. Ponomariov vs Caruana 0-1462013Kings TournamentA07 King's Indian Attack
17. Nisipeanu vs Radjabov  ½-½322013Kings TournamentB22 Sicilian, Alapin
18. Caruana vs H Wang 0-1482013Kings TournamentC42 Petrov Defense
19. Radjabov vs Caruana ½-½192013Kings TournamentD16 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
20. H Wang vs Ponomariov 1-0592013Kings TournamentD42 Queen's Gambit Declined, Semi-Tarrasch, 7.Bd3
 page 1 of 1; 20 games  PGN Download 
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-14-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: The concept of fairness does not necessarily come into play, and Caruana will doubtless earn his chance-may not be now, though, and he fell short in the Grand Prix. That is cold reality.
Oct-14-13  Shams: <perfidious> The concept of fairness *should* come into play though. If not Caruana, that spot will instead go to someone else who also fell short in the Grand Prix. It would have been nice if Caruana had controlled his destiny though; you're right about that.
Oct-14-13  devere: If I was Caruana I would consider emigrating to Russia next week, assuming that Vlad Putin offers him the appropriate deal. Russian tax rates are low also.
Oct-15-13  SirRuthless: Sorry, fab. Tough sledding near 2800...I still think he will win the wildcard slot.
Oct-15-13  Kinghunt: The curse of 2800 strikes again, it would seem. The force is with you, young Caruana, but you are not a Jedi yet.
Oct-15-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Caruana is fighting hard, but a rook down is hard to save.
Oct-15-13  virginmind: Still 37.fxg3 looked such a natural move...what can be wrong with having to defend against one pawn instead of two (connected), and aditionally you're sustaining your h4 pawn, then the queen will come over to help and everything seems fine...in time trouble that is. Or was it not?
Oct-15-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: All over now. f2 pawn was too big a Sisyphean boulder.
Oct-15-13  SirRuthless: 37.fxg is horrible. That rook does no work on f1 at best and at worst it is imprisoned for good without compensation. He had to be looking for perpetuals at that point but Caruana's blitz skills are not on par with most of the very elite.
Oct-15-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Caruana is dwarfed by his chair. If FIDE had weight classes, these guys would be #1 and #2 bantamweights.
Oct-15-13  csmath: This whole game between Caruana and Wang is not exactly an example of good chess on this level.
Oct-15-13  SirRuthless: <csmath> I will be looking forward to your analysis of this game.
Oct-15-13  csmath: I am waiting for cg.com to post game page. Boy, this is one really bad game throughout.
Oct-15-13  The Last Straw: Wang Hao is doing the same Norway Chess thing: Losing to the lowest-rated player, but winning against the highest-rated.
Oct-15-13  framsey: <The Last Straw> But does he raise the level of his game against the best, or do the best just overlook him?

Judging by this game, the latter.

Oct-15-13  The Last Straw: <framsey> Good point.
Oct-15-13  SirRuthless: I don't think players overlook him. I think he has been out of form recently. I also think he is an inconsistent player who loses badly on his bad days where other seem to be able to draw on theirs more often. Hopefully this win will kickstart him back into the mid 2700s and beyond.
Oct-15-13  csmath: Wang Hao plays wild chess. You can call it creative and imaginative but quite often that is also simply a bad chess.
Oct-16-13  Calar: Radjabov - Caruana was early draw ended in perpetual chess. Congrats to Caruana for his well deserved victory :)

Caruana has shown excellent chess in the last year or so, amplified with consistent good results. I think he deserved to be nominated as wildcard in the Candidates tournament.

Oct-16-13  SirRuthless: <Calar> Tell that to the Russians. Personally I think he should play a mini-match with Nakamura for it. They are 3.5 rating points apart on the live list and Nakamura is +3 vs Caruana this year with a couple of draws and no losses. The Russians will probably give it to Svidler or Grischuk.
Oct-16-13  DanteAlighieri: Caruana-Nakamura would be a great match! Who could sponsor it? Maybe Rex Sinquefield?
Oct-16-13  csmath: Russian organizer will chose Russian player, no doubt just like Italian organizer would chose Caruana or American would chose Nakamura.

The problem here is with FIDE if they give this event to Khanty-M. It is too far, too remote, and away from public eye. I do not understand how can that help to promote the event but I guess they have no money otherwise.

Event in Khanty-M without Carlsen (likely), without Nakamura, without Caruana and with 50% of Russians will not attract any attention apart from hardcore chess afficionados.

I have nothing against Khanty-M but they should start organizing supertournament (create their own event ...say Kasparov "Memorial") rather than getting FIDE events repeatedly.

Oct-16-13  SirRuthless: Looks like Wang Hao has found something... Good to see him winning games again. Two big wins against staunch defenders.
Oct-16-13  SirRuthless: <csmath> Why do they keep getting FIDE events? What political element in FIDE continues to provide them hosting rights to major events and why do they do it?
Oct-16-13  parmetd: scary that because Ivanchuk and Ponomariov have done so poorly rating wise recently that eljanov is ahead on the ukranian list (as spot 1). no insult to him, just last time he held the number one spot for month it was after an amazing surge of 50+ points on his own accord before he regressed to the mean.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC