chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆
TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
FIDE Grand Prix Beijing Tournament

Shakhriyar Mamedyarov7/11(+5 -2 =4)[games]
Alexander Grischuk6.5/11(+3 -1 =7)[games]
Peter Leko6/11(+1 -0 =10)[games]
Veselin Topalov6/11(+3 -2 =6)[games]
Anish Giri5.5/11(+3 -3 =5)[games]
Alexander Morozevich5.5/11(+3 -3 =5)[games]
Yue Wang5.5/11(+2 -2 =7)[games]
Sergey Karjakin5.5/11(+3 -3 =5)[games]
Vasyl Ivanchuk5/11(+2 -3 =6)[games]
Boris Gelfand5/11(+2 -3 =6)[games]
Hao Wang5/11(+2 -3 =6)[games]
Gata Kamsky3.5/11(+1 -5 =5)[games]

 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 66  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Morozevich vs Y Wang ½-½602013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
2. Gelfand vs Topalov 0-1412013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingD97 Grunfeld, Russian
3. Leko vs Mamedyarov ½-½512013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingB90 Sicilian, Najdorf
4. Kamsky vs Grischuk 0-1392013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingB30 Sicilian
5. Ivanchuk vs H Wang ½-½282013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingD40 Queen's Gambit Declined, Semi-Tarrasch
6. Giri vs Karjakin 0-1422013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingC67 Ruy Lopez
7. Y Wang vs Gelfand ½-½222013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingD73 Neo-Grunfeld, 5.Nf3
8. Giri vs Morozevich ½-½222013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingC11 French
9. Topalov vs Leko ½-½352013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingE15 Queen's Indian
10. Mamedyarov vs Kamsky ½-½362013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingD15 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
11. Grischuk vs Ivanchuk ½-½402013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingB42 Sicilian, Kan
12. Karjakin vs H Wang 1-0302013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingB09 Pirc, Austrian Attack
13. Morozevich vs Karjakin 0-1352013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingE15 Queen's Indian
14. Gelfand vs Giri 0-1372013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingA88 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation with c6
15. Ivanchuk vs Mamedyarov 0-1432013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingE10 Queen's Pawn Game
16. H Wang vs Grischuk ½-½472013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingD85 Grunfeld
17. Leko vs Y Wang ½-½592013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingD41 Queen's Gambit Declined, Semi-Tarrasch
18. Kamsky vs Topalov ½-½752013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingD37 Queen's Gambit Declined
19. Karjakin vs Grischuk ½-½312013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingB80 Sicilian, Scheveningen
20. Y Wang vs Kamsky 1-0812013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingA35 English, Symmetrical
21. Morozevich vs Gelfand 1-0342013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingD97 Grunfeld, Russian
22. Giri vs Leko ½-½252013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingE46 Nimzo-Indian
23. Topalov vs Ivanchuk ½-½462013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingB32 Sicilian
24. Mamedyarov vs H Wang 1-0372013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingD10 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
25. Leko vs Morozevich ½-½312013FIDE Grand Prix BeijingB44 Sicilian
 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 66  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 24 OF 25 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-16-13  notyetagm: <Refused: ... Caruana or Karjakin look like good bets for the Wild Card if they fail to qualify otherwise.>

Caruana or Karjakin vying for the one Wildcard spot would be a tough call.

I would go with Caruana because he is higher rated but like you said, the World Cup will clarify things greatly.

Jul-16-13  csmath: This Grand Prix circle looks like a game of chairs with participants riding a rollacoaster. They are all in the game to compete for WC and yet it is hard to imagine anyone of them ever to accomplish that.

Is this really helpful in popularizing the game? I think they all probably need Susan Polgar.

Jul-16-13  Refused: <notyetagm: <Refused: ... Caruana or Karjakin look like good bets for the Wild Card if they fail to qualify otherwise.> Caruana or Karjakin vying for the one Wildcard spot would be a tough call.

I would go with Caruana because he is higher rated but like you said, the World Cup will clarify things greatly.>

Yeah, the World Cup has a lot of stiff competition. And I seriously wonder, why Aronian and Kramnik are playing.

They have their tickets to the candidates. So basically they could (it's not very likely though) get eliminated in the first round and would just miss out on the prize money. Everybody else is competing for the spots in the candidates. IMO it did not make sense to let them play the World Cup. But looking at the table, it looks like Kramnik will get 3 rounds relatively smooth sailing. So him taking home another spot for the Elo list looks possible.

Also, Mamedyarov, Caruana or Grischuk will qualify by the GP series, and if the GP qualifiers ends up in the final, his second candidates spot would also go to the next in line on the rating list.

Let's see if Grischuk decides to draw his games against the better opponents to play Rapid and Blitz.

Jul-16-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: <FairyPromotion:

I expect Radjabov to play in Paris, and give it his best, just to help his compatriot.>

How does that help his compatriot?!?

Jul-16-13  Method B: <Yeah, the World Cup has a lot of stiff competition. And I seriously wonder, why Aronian and Kramnik are playing.>

One must participate either in the World Cup or the Grand Prix series to earn qualification to the Candidates Tourney by ratings. It's a rule change compared to last year and I believe it's a good one.

Jul-16-13  notyetagm: <plang: <FairyPromotion:

I expect Radjabov to play in Paris, and give it his best, just to help his compatriot.>

How does that help his compatriot?!?>

If Radjabov can stick losses on Caruana and Grischuk, it decreases their chance of finishing clear first.

Mamedyarov finishes 2nd in the GP *unless* Grischuk or Caruana takes clear first.

Jul-16-13  Refused: <Method B: <Yeah, the World Cup has a lot of stiff competition. And I seriously wonder, why Aronian and Kramnik are playing.> One must participate either in the World Cup or the Grand Prix series to earn qualification to the Candidates Tourney by ratings. It's a rule change compared to last year and I believe it's a good one.>

Ah ok, I think it's actually a non-sensical one.
If either Aronian or Kramnik decide, to make short draws and forfeit the Rapid or Blitz Tiebreaker, they have met the the criterion. And basically they are in no need to deliver a result, there.

I would have prefered to add players who have to compete there, not those who just sit out some time.

Jul-16-13  Edeltalent: <notyetagm: <plang: <FairyPromotion:

I expect Radjabov to play in Paris, and give it his best, just to help his compatriot.>

How does that help his compatriot?!?>

If Radjabov can stick losses on Caruana and Grischuk, it decreases their chance of finishing clear first.

Mamedyarov finishes 2nd in the GP *unless* Grischuk or Caruana takes clear first.>

I sure hope there won't be a situation where Radja could "help" his compatriot by losing against someone who's competing for the tournament victory with Grischuk or Caruana...

Jul-16-13  Edeltalent: <Refused: If either Aronian or Kramnik decide, to make short draws and forfeit the Rapid or Blitz Tiebreaker, they have met the the criterion. And basically they are in no need to deliver a result, there.>

But that strategy would cost them rating points, and as it was their ratings that freed them of needing to deliver a result in the first place, they probably won't want to give them away that easily.

Jul-16-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <Is this really helpful in popularizing the game? I think they all probably need Susan Polgar.>

lmao...

Jul-16-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: <If Radjabov can stick losses on Caruana and Grischuk, it decreases their chance of finishing clear first.

Mamedyarov finishes 2nd in the GP *unless* Grischuk or Caruana takes clear first.>

Well, yea, and if he loses to them he will hurt Mamedyrovs chances - still doesn't really answer my question.

I brought it up since the poster seemed to be encouraging "hanky panky" which, I assume, everyone would condemn.

Jul-16-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: If any player qualifies by both GP and World Cup, the next players in the GP qualify, so the 3rd and even 4th place may still be relevant.
Jul-16-13  tolengoy: This GP is a tourney of cherry picked contestants to filter out two qualifiers to the next candidates match.

<qualify by what standard may I ask?>

Ahh yes...7 were nominated out of whims and caprices of organizers, 9 from the elo rating that measures volume of activity, the rest from figuring highly in non related events.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIDE_G...

I thought you need to enter a rigorious prequalification tourney to reach the finals - much importantly, <all> chessplayers be given their fair share to partipate. This is the norm in every sport events ...why would chess events be treated differently?

Jul-16-13  nok: Remember Grischuk boasting before the tournament that he's the new king of draws? Now someone did set things straight.
Jul-16-13  Estoc: Congratulations to Leko for not losing a game.
Jul-16-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: Lol <tolengoy>. And the "elo rating that measures the volume of activity" struck once again: Topalov, who already qualified to the Candidates, qualified here by rating. As did one of the three players who still can reach Nr. 2, Mamedyarov. The other one, Grischuk, qualified from the World Cup, to which he qualified - how'd ya think? - by rating. And only Caruana was a wildcard spot.

So, if rating doesn't meaure playing strength, why do rating qualifiers rule the series? :D

Jul-16-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: Actually, all non-wildcard players somehow got rating in the game, as they qualfied by ratings to the events they qualified from. Which once more shows, <rating qualifiers rule>.

Gelfand: qualified as loser of the WC match 2012, to which he qualified as winner of the Candidates 2011, to which he qualified as winner of Wold Cup 2009, to which he qualified by rating

Svidler: qualified as winner of the World Cup 2011, to which he qualified by rating

Grischuk: qualified as second of the World Cup 2011, to which he qualified by rating

Ivanchuk: qualified as third of the World Cup 2011, to which he qualified by rating

Ponomariov: qualified as the fourth of the World Cup 2011, to which he qualified as a finalist of the World Cup 2009, to which he qualified by rating.

Jul-16-13  Whitehat1963: And Drawko finishes with 10 draws. His parents must be proud!
Jul-16-13  Refused: <Edeltalent: <Refused: If either Aronian or Kramnik decide, to make short draws and forfeit the Rapid or Blitz Tiebreaker, they have met the the criterion. And basically they are in no need to deliver a result, there.> But that strategy would cost them rating points, and as it was their ratings that freed them of needing to deliver a result in the first place, they probably won't want to give them away that easily>

Remains to be seen. It's not like 2 games will cost Aronian or Kramnik 100 points. They play enough over the year to cover for the points they drop there. But they are not really under the same pressure as likesay Ivanchuk or Svidler to deliver.

I am quite sure, that the wildcard will go to Caruana or Karjakin, unless the wildcard was giving away a bait for China to host the Grand Prix in Beijing. That would give Wang Hao the Wild Card (as the only Chinese to be above 2725 now). But in all fairness, anything but a Wildcard to Caruana or Karjakin would surprise me (assuming they won't make it through the World Cup). Though it would be funny, if they gave it to Radjabov over Caruana and Karjakin, after his candidates fiasco this year.

Jul-16-13  badest: <Refused: ... Though it would be funny, if they gave it to Radjabov over Caruana and Karjakin, after his candidates fiasco this year.> No, that would not be funny at all ... it would indeed be very sad. Esp. if the oil-money push down Karjakin or Caruana.
Jul-16-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Diademas: Has the host for the next candidate tournament been decided, or is it all down to Azeri money again?
Jul-16-13  Refused: Well it would be funny to me. Because I can already see Joe Sixpacks ranting on the forum here. I don't consider it very likely. The only scenario I can see, the wildcard going to anybody else apart from Caruana and Karjakin, would be Mamedyarov not being able to qualify by other means. But that's not a very likely scenario now.

Maybe Rex Sinquefield opens his purse to host the candidates in the US and Nakamura gets the buy in. I refrain from making a joke about whom he might cite during the opening ceremony.

Jul-16-13  Rolfo: <No, that would not be funny at all ... it would indeed be very sad. Esp. if the oil-money push down Karjakin or Caruana.>

Agree. The use of Azeri oil money smells, it's enough for a while. I wonder why AGON couldn't collect more money from a much wider group of sponsors, or is AGON out? Besides, I think Radja needs a break to recover from whatever trouble of life and/or chess that hit him. Now Mamedyarov is closer to the Candidates, all by himself

Jul-16-13  tolengoy: <to which he qualified by rating.>

Only in chess this seems to be a prime commodity. Yet not relied upon in all other sports...they need to qualify to the finals by playing in preliminaries. It is in this light that Efren Bata Reyes will be a greater sports hero than Magnus Carlsen can ever dreamed to be.

Jul-17-13  FairyPromotion: <plang: Well, yea, and if he loses to them he will hurt Mamedyrovs chances - still doesn't really answer my question.

I brought it up since the poster seemed to be encouraging "hanky panky" which, I assume, everyone would condemn.>

Lol, what are you talking about? I was merely pointing out that Radjabov who withdrew from two Grand Prix tournaments already, might be willing to play in the final one, because if he <wins> that tournament, he might help Mamedyarov, or even himself* (though <alexmagnus> hinted that that's not the case). If you read it as "hanky panky," then that's your problem. I personally don't see anything wrong with what I said. Sure he might not win, and yet decide the outcome for the others, but if there is something suspicious I'd be the first one to call it out. However I've seen nothing from Radjabov to hint that he'll be dropping games on purpose. And if players were to be encouraged for "hanky panky" by my posts, then Grischuk would be the one to benefit, as both Svidler and Karjakin will be playing, too.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 25)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 24 OF 25 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC