< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 6 OF 7 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Sep-25-09 | | Marmot PFL: Black must wait for the white king to advance then bring his own king to attack g3 and h3, sac the rook for the a pawn and try to draw with rook vs pawn. |
|
Sep-25-09 | | Marmot PFL: Looks like white can play Rb3+ after Kg3, guarding h3 and allowing Kb7 winning |
|
Sep-25-09 | | percyblakeney: Short is winning. |
|
Sep-25-09 | | percyblakeney: After a bad start Short has played quite well in this match. |
|
Sep-25-09
 | | sbevan: Yup, excellent calculating! |
|
Sep-25-09 | | DCP23: We need just a draw in the last game and my prediction made two weeks ago at Nigel Short page would be 100% fulfilled: <Sep-12-09> <DCP23: <Paint My Dragon: anyone brave enough to make any predictions?>
Sure. Prediction: Nigel wins 3.5:2.5, winning two, losing one, with three draws.> |
|
Sep-25-09 | | whiteshark: Under time pressure Efimenko went astray from the right path. 51...Kf5? and 52.Ra4? were blunders. |
|
Sep-25-09 | | Gypsy: <whiteshark> By then (move 50), the position looks 'beyond hope' to my superficial glance. Is there a particular game-saving maneuver for Black you spotted? |
|
Sep-25-09
 | | Frankygolucky: what was the right path ? were there drawing resources ? |
|
Sep-25-09 | | whiteshark: <Gypsy>, is there any winning manouvre for white after <51...Ke5>? j/k Maybe there are better moves for black instead of <49...Ra2>? |
|
Sep-25-09 | | Gypsy: <whiteshark: ... is there any winning manouvre for white after <51...Ke5>? > The trouble with the <51...Ke5> is that after, say, <52.Rf7...> the Black king will already have lost contact with his own pawns. At the same time, White keeps all its assets intact. Btw, I am not claiming that 51...Ke5 is any worse than the game. Black is between a rock and hard place: White primary threat is to walk his king to support the Pa7. That can not be stopped by the Black-rook actions alone, lest Pa7 promotes. The Black rook is tied to the a-file and the White king can therefore get through, along the b-file, by harassing that rook if necessary. On the other hand, if Black king tries to help block the White king's progress, then White simply trades Pa7 for the two Black pawns on the K-side and, with two pawns extra, wins. And finally, if Black king marches to forcibly collect the Pa7, then White trades the Pa7 and the two rooks(!). White then easily wins the resulting K+Ps endgame, because Black king would be hopelessly out of play. It seems to me that Efimenko tried to trade pawns and pined his hopes on somehow stopping the remaining pawn (possibly the h-pawn) of White. But, in that position, that too was only a slim chance. |
|
Sep-25-09 | | Gypsy: Incidentally, given that the match is played in Mukachevo, does anyone here know whether Efimenko is a Rusyn? |
|
Sep-25-09 | | parmetd: Short wins!!! My 3-1-2 prediction is loooking more likely now that its 2-1-2 |
|
Sep-25-09 | | whiteshark: <Gypsy>, thanks for your solid arguments. Here a just a drafted general defensive plan that I had in mind: Black can't hinder White's King to support his Pa7 via b-line. It will cost the rook. [but this requires the white rook to block chess from behind] So Black's only chance lies in creating a passer on the kingside, supported by his king to archieve a draw in ♔♖:♔♙ endgame as it could have happend in Alekhine vs Bogoljubov, 1929 There are probably better games with more similarities to this game than in my choosen example. And here it don't work as white just avoid the exchange of kingside pawns. |
|
Sep-25-09 | | Gypsy: <whiteshark> Yes, your idea generally sound and makes sense in the schematic way. But I think that here, as you also point out, it won't work because Black time budget to carry out all the exchanges and counterattacks that need to happen is too large. (Black just wold not have enough moves after his desperado rook surrender.) |
|
Sep-25-09 | | WhiteRook48: I predict that Efimenko will win game #6 |
|
Sep-26-09 | | vonKrolock: <7.exd6> Taking with the ♗ will lead to sharp lines without black 0-0, while taking with the ♕ looks more solid... let's see |
|
Sep-26-09 | | Marmot PFL: an old line of the 2 knights defense, which should not surprise short |
|
Sep-26-09 | | pugofcrydee: blacks just played 8.a6. In this position if white plays h3 do you think Nigel would play h5? |
|
Sep-26-09 | | Squares: Nh6. That is the 1 Knight move I did not look at. |
|
Sep-26-09 | | pugofcrydee: take it h5v didnt work? im not fritzing... |
|
Sep-26-09 | | Squares: There is no way I can calculate that my dear chap. For me it looked way to speculative with Short's pieces not fully developed and King still exposed. |
|
Sep-26-09 | | Marmot PFL: short only needs to draw and whites edge (if any) looks to small for him to resonably expect more |
|
Sep-26-09 | | Ezzy: Efimenko needs to win, and he's having trouble trying to break down Nigel in the Ruy Lopez. Efimenko has never played this opening with white before so it's an attempt to bamboozle Nigel with some different preparation. click for larger viewOne game in the chessbase database with this position. There white played 10 Re1+ Be7 11 Bb3 b5 This game was a draw. |
|
Sep-26-09 | | whiteshark: Efimenko's opening choice went down like a lead balloon. For finding 12.Bb3 he's now down to 28 minutes... |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 6 OF 7 ·
Later Kibitzing> |