chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆 London Chess Club Invitational (1851)

  PARTICIPANTS (sorted by highest achieved rating; click on name to see player's games)
Adolf Anderssen, Bernhard Horwitz, Daniel Harrwitz, August Ehrmann, Lionel Kieseritzky, Johann Lowenthal, Karl Mayerhofer, Frederick Deacon, Edward Lowe, Imre Szabo, Josef Kling

Chessgames.com Chess Event Description
London Chess Club Invitational (1851)

London, England (28 July-8 August 1851)

1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 Score Place/Prize —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— 1 Anderssen •• ½1 1 - ½1 1 - - 1 1 1 7 1st Gold Cup* 2 Deacon ½0 •• - - - - - - - 1 1 2 3 Mayerhofer 0 - •• 1 - 1 - - - - - 2 4 Harrwitz - - 0 •• - - - - 1 - - 1 5 Horwitz ½0 - - - •• - - - - 1 - 1 6 Kieseritzky 0 - 0 - - •• - - - - 1 1 7 Kling - - - - - - •• - - - 1 1 8 Loewenthal - - - - - - - •• ½- - 1 1 9 Ehrmann 0 - - 0 - - - ½- •• - - 0 10 Lowe 0 0 - - 0 - - - - •• - 0 11 Szabo 0 0 - - - 0 0 0 - - •• 0 —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— Format: Single round robin, drawn games replayed and did not count. Venue: London Chess Club. * About 20 games were played before participants withdrew and the event ended.


Introduction
The London Chess Club offers a Gold Cup, value 100 guineas, as a prize to be contended for by Foreign Chess Players only, each competitor has to play one game with every other participator in the contest, and the one who achieves the greatest number of victories, gains the prize. The following gentlemen have already entered the list:—Messrs. Anderssen, Loewenthal, Harrwitz, Horwitz, Szabo, Kling, Deacon, Meyerhoffer, Loewe, and several others are expected to join.(1)

Synopsis
London Chess Club.—The hundred guinea cup so handsomely presented by this society for competition to the foreign visitors of chess eminence brought here by the Exhibition, has been honourably gained by M. Anderssen. Among the competitors were MM. Ehreman, Kling, Deacon of Bruges, Harwitz, Horwitz, &c. Some beautiful play was elicited.(2)

<Dix joueurs étrangers, MM. Anderssen, Deacon, Ehrmann, Harrwitz, Horwitz, Kling, Loewe, Loewenthal, Mayerhofer, Szabo, furent invités à prendre part à cette lutte. M. Kieseritzky, alors à Paris, reçut à cet égard une lettre d'invitation de l'honorable président du Cercle, conçue en termes si flatteurs qu'il fallait céder bon gré malgré. D'après l'arrangement fait par la commission, le prix devait être décerné à celui qui gagnerait le plus grand nombre de parties, chacun jouant une seule partie avec chacun. Cet arrangement était vicieux, car la plupart des joueurs se sont retirés lorsqu'ils ont vu qu'ils n'avaient pas chance de gagner. Le but était donc manqué, dans ce sens qu'au lieu d'être arrivé à recueillir un nombre considérable de parties bien jouées, on n'en a pù recueilli qu'une vingtaine de valeur douteuse. Aussi, n'était-il pas équitable de mettre un seul et unique prix; beaucoup mieux aurait-il valu fixer le nombre que chacun devait jouer avec chacun à deux (pour rester tout à fait dans l'équité), el diviser ensuite le prix proportionnellement au nombre des parties gagnées et remises, c'est-à-dire en mettant deux portions pour chaque partie gagnée et une portion pour chaque partie nulle. De cette manière, tout le monde serait resté jusqu'à la fin. M. Kieseritzky n'est arrivé qu'au moment où la moitié des combattants s'éntaient déjà retirés; il n'a eu occasion que de faire les parties MM. Anderssen et Mayerhofer, qu'il a perdes, et celle de M. Szabo, qu'il a gagnée.>(3)

Translation: Ten foreign players, Messrs. Anderssen, Deacon, Ehrmann, Harrwitz, Horwitz, Kling, Loewe, Loewenthal, Mayerhofer, Szabo, were invited to take part in this fight. Mr. Kieseritzky, then in Paris, received in this regard a letter of invitation from the honorable president of the Club, couched in such flattering terms that it was necessary to acquiesce. According to the arrangement made by the commission, the prize was to be awarded to the one who won the greatest number of games, everyone playing a single game with each other. This arrangement was disappointing, as most players withdrew when they saw that they had no chance of winning. The goal was therefore missed, in the sense that instead of managing to collect a considerable number of well-played games, only about twenty of dubious value were collected. Also, it was not fair to have a single and unique prize; it would have been much better to fix the number that each had to play with each other at two (to remain completely fair), and then divide the prize proportionally to the number of games won and drawn, that is to say by putting two portions for each game won and one portion for each game drawn. In this way, everyone would have stayed until the end. Mr. Kieseritzky only arrived when half the combatants had already withdrawn; he only had the opportunity to play games with Messrs. Anderssen and Mayerhofer, which he lost, and with Mr. Szabo, which he won.(3)

<Diese Einrichtung war mangelhaft, denn die Mehrzahl der Spieler zogen sich zurück, als sie keine Aussicht auf den Gewinn zu haben bemerkten. So wurde der Zweck, eine reiche Sammlung gut gespielter Partieen zu erhalten, verfehlt, indem man nur etwa 20 Spiele von sehr fraglichem Werth bekam. Auch war es nicht billig, einen einzigen Preis auszusetzen.>(4)

Translation: This arrangement failed in its purpose, for the majority of those players who realized that they had no prospect of winning withdrew. Hence, the goal of obtaining a rich collection of well-played games was not met, and there are only about twenty games of very questionable value. Furthermore, it was not appropriate to award only a single prize.(4)

Mr. Anderssen has, up to the present moment, carried everything before him in the contest for the cup given by the London Chess Club.(5)

Conclusion
Mr. Anderssen has again been successful in the grand match played at the London Chess Club, and he has already taken his departure for Germany.(6) Mr. Anderssen is now at Berlin. The London Chess Club has sent the Gold Cup which he (Mr. Anderssen) won.(7)

Missing Game
Of the "about 20" games played it is thought that the decisive re-play between Loewenthal and Ehrmann is missing from the above results.

Sources
(1) The Chess Player, v1 n3, 2 August 1851, p19
(2) London Standard, 1851.08.18, p3
(3) La Régence, v3 n8, August 1851, pp238-239
(4) Schachzeitung, v6 n10, October 1851, p346
(5) The Chess Player, v1 n4, 9 August 1851, p30
(6) The Chess Player, v1 n5, 16 August 1851, p40
(7) The Chess Player, v1 n7, 30 August 1851, p54

Credit
French translation by User: jnpope
German translation by User: cameosis

 page 1 of 1; 19 games  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. A Ehrmann vs Anderssen 0-1351851London Chess Club InvitationalC24 Bishop's Opening
2. I Szabo vs Kieseritzky 0-1161851London Chess Club InvitationalC35 King's Gambit Accepted, Cunningham
3. Lowenthal vs I Szabo  1-0281851London Chess Club InvitationalC50 Giuoco Piano
4. J Kling vs I Szabo  1-0301851London Chess Club InvitationalD20 Queen's Gambit Accepted
5. F Deacon vs I Szabo  1-0161851London Chess Club InvitationalA10 English
6. F Deacon vs Anderssen ½-½181851London Chess Club InvitationalA84 Dutch
7. Horwitz vs E Lowe  1-0451851London Chess Club InvitationalC30 King's Gambit Declined
8. Anderssen vs E Lowe 1-0331851London Chess Club InvitationalC50 Giuoco Piano
9. Lowenthal vs A Ehrmann  ½-½561851London Chess Club InvitationalB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
10. I Szabo vs Anderssen 0-1251851London Chess Club InvitationalC44 King's Pawn Game
11. Anderssen vs Horwitz ½-½321851London Chess Club InvitationalC33 King's Gambit Accepted
12. F Deacon vs E Lowe  1-0451851London Chess Club InvitationalA20 English
13. F Deacon vs Anderssen 0-1381851London Chess Club InvitationalA02 Bird's Opening
14. Anderssen vs Horwitz 1-0311851London Chess Club InvitationalC44 King's Pawn Game
15. Kieseritzky vs Anderssen 0-1331851London Chess Club InvitationalB20 Sicilian
16. A Ehrmann vs Harrwitz 0-1411851London Chess Club InvitationalC26 Vienna
17. K Mayerhofer vs Harrwitz 1-0851851London Chess Club InvitationalC50 Giuoco Piano
18. Anderssen vs K Mayerhofer 1-0481851London Chess Club InvitationalC01 French, Exchange
19. K Mayerhofer vs Kieseritzky 1-0431851London Chess Club InvitationalC55 Two Knights Defense
 page 1 of 1; 19 games  PGN Download 
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-29-24  stone free or die: Staunton was not amused at the

<London Chess Club Usurper Tournament>.

It's a legitimate grip, as they did "[hold] aloof"

Oct-30-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Illustrated London News, August 2nd 1851, p.147:

<AN ENGLISHMAN - We have certainly heard such a report, but can hardly believe it possible that any body of British chess-players, but more especially those of the London Chess Club, who professedly held aloof from the Tourney of the St. George's Club, because, being open to all the world, it was not sufficiently "national," could be guilty of such an outrage upon common decency - such an insult to every chess amateur in the land - as to offer a prize of 100 guineas in value, from the competition for which "British chess-players are excluded!">

Repost due to a transcription error.

Oct-30-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Illustrated London News, August 16th 1851, p.219:

<It is gratifying to know that by far the most eminent of the Chess magnates who visited England to take part in the Chess Congress (we mean Major Jaenisch) declined in the most positive manner to have anything whatever to do with the opposition schemes of the London Club and regards them with the same feelings of disgust which every player of upright and gentlemanly spirit in this country does.>

<Our space is too restricted just now to admit of the publication of your letter; besides, it is a waste of honest indignation to expend it on such a farce as the cup prize of the London Chess Club has turned out. The thing was evidently got up as a lure for the foreign guests of the St. George's Chess Club; but, although the bribe of some £20 value was magnified into one of £100, few entered, and the competition has proved a most contemptible and ridiculous failure.>

Oct-30-24  stone free or die: <Missy> are you able to delete posts older than one hour!? So unfair!
Apr-19-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: <Ten foreign players, Messrs. Anderssen, Deacon, Ehrmann, Harrwitz, Horwitz, Kling, Loewe, Loewenthal, Mayerhofer, Szabo, were invited to take part in this fight.>

Loewe and Kling were long-term residents in England, while Deacon was an Englishman who had been residing in Belgium for many years.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC