chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
David Bronstein vs Robert James Fischer
Herceg Novi blitz (1970) (blitz), Herceg Novi MNE, rd 7, Apr-08
Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation. Smith-Morra Declined (B22)  ·  0-1

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
1
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
White to move.
ANALYSIS [x]
Notes by Stockfish 9 v010218 (minimum 6s/ply) 9.exd6 Bxd6 10.Bc4 O-O 11.O-O a6 12.a4 Bd7 13.Re1 h6 = +0.32 (21 ply) ⩱ -0.55 (27 ply) 10...f5 11.Qa4 O-O 12.Nxc6 bxc6 13.Bc4 Qc7 14.Nf3 e5 = -0.50 (24 ply)= +0.30 (23 ply)better is 12...b6 13.O-O Bb7 14.Nf3 Qc7 15.Bf4 Qxe5 16.Bxe5 b5 = -0.05 (23 ply) ⩲ +0.57 (21 ply) 13...g6 14.Qh3 e5 15.Qh6 Re8 16.Nf3 Bf8 17.Qg5 f6 18.Qh4 = -0.36 (21 ply)better is 14.O-O b5 15.Nf3 Qd7 16.Rd1 Bb7 17.Bb3 a5 18.a4 b4 19.Qh3 = +0.49 (21 ply)= -0.13 (24 ply) after 14...Bf4 15.Qh4 Qxh4 16.Nxh4 Bxc1 17.Rxc1 b5 18.O-O Nf4 better is 18...Kg7 19.Bb3 e5 20.g3 Bh6 21.Qh4 Qxh4 22.Nxh4 a5 = 0.00 (24 ply) ⩲ +0.70 (24 ply) after 19.Bb3 Kg7 20.Nd4 e5 21.Bd5 Rb8 22.Nc6 Rb7 23.g3 Bg5 19...Kg7 20.Bb3 a6 21.Nd4 e5 22.Qf3 Ra7 23.Nc6 Rc7 24.Nb4 = +0.38 (25 ply) ⩲ +1.18 (26 ply) after 20.Bb3 g5 21.g3 g4 22.Qh5 gxf3 23.Qxf3 Bxg3 24.hxg3 Rb8 better is 23...Kf6 24.Nd4 Be5 25.f4 Bxd4+ 26.Rxd4 Rb8 27.Kf2 Rb7 ⩲ +0.58 (26 ply) ⩲ +1.15 (28 ply) 25.Bd5 Rb8 26.Nc6 Rb7 27.Nb4 Rb8 28.Bg2 Rg8 29.a4 Rg7 ⩲ +0.89 (28 ply)better is 25...Bd7 26.Rd2 Re7 27.Nf3 Bc6 28.Nd4 Bd7 = 0.00 (30 ply)better is 26.Bd5 Ra7 27.Nc6 Rb7 28.Bf3 b5 29.Nb4 Bb6+ 30.Kg2 Rbe7 ⩲ +0.52 (29 ply)= 0.00 (29 ply) 33.Nf3+ Bxf3 34.Kxf3 e5 35.Rh1 e4+ 36.Kf2 e3+ 37.Ke2 ⩱ -0.52 (27 ply) ∓ -1.60 (30 ply) after 33...Kf6 34.Nd7+ Kg5 35.Ne5 Rh8 36.Nf3+ Kf6 37.Rh4 Rxh4 34.Rh4 Rxh4 35.gxh4+ Kxh4 36.Bc4 Kg5 37.Nf3+ Kf6 38.Rh1 ⩱ -1.23 (21 ply) 34...Bxf3 35.Kxf3 e5 36.Rh4 e4+ 37.Ke2 Rd7 38.Rh3 Red8 ∓ -2.02 (27 ply) 35.g4 b5 36.Bxe6 Bxf3 37.Kxf3 Rh3+ 38.Kg2 Rh2+ 39.Kf3 ⩱ -0.55 (26 ply) ∓ -1.89 (26 ply) 37.Rg1 Bd6 38.Ke2 Bc5 39.Rd1 e4 40.Nd4 Rh8 41.Ne6 Be7 ⩱ -1.50 (20 ply)-+ -2.88 (29 ply) after 37...Rh8 38.Rd1 Bc6 39.Bd5 Be8 40.Rh1 Rxh5 41.Rxh5 Bxh5 38...Rh8 39.Bd1 Rg8 40.Rg1 Rxg1 41.Kxg1 f4 42.Bb3 Be5 -+ -2.81 (27 ply) ⩱ -0.55 (28 ply) 41.h6 Be5 42.Nf3 Rh8 43.Rh1 Bc7 44.Bc4 a5 45.Bd3 Bxd3+ ⩱ -0.60 (23 ply)-+ -3.05 (26 ply) 45...Bf4 46.Rg7 Re7 47.Nc6 Rxg7 48.hxg7 Kxg7 49.Ke2 Be4 -+ -4.01 (28 ply)-+ -2.58 (25 ply) after 46.Nc6 Rd7 47.Re1 Bf4 48.Kf3 Bd2 49.Ne5 Rd6 50.Ng4+ Kf7 50.Rh4+ Bh5+ 51.Kf2 Kg5 52.Rh3 Bd6 53.b4 Kf6 54.Re3 Bg4 -+ -3.25 (22 ply)0-1

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 77 times; par: 90 [what's this?]

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [35437 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Bronstein/Fischer games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To see the raw PGN for this game, click on the PGN: view link above.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-04-06  LoFarkas: That was a pretty drawn out conversation, starting in August last year...

To me, this position looks like Bronstein resigned. There was no immediate threat, so he could have made a quick move if he wanted to, even if he was low on time. But he was down a piece and he lost his passed pawn.

As to which is more frequent; resignation or losing on time, I dunno.

May-11-08  Lt.Columbo: Hmmm I wonder was the 1970 Herceg Novi the strongest blitz contest ever held? I mean they had some pretty good players entered in that one, not that I would know you see as I only play chess as a way of letting off steam. Im far too busy solving murder investigations to be a master at the grand game, ah thats another story for another day. I bid you a good day gentleman.

May-11-08  MichAdams: Just one more thing....right eye or left?
May-11-08  Lt.Columbo: Hello MitchAdams! < right eye or left > Now thats a good question! Now thats the first question I would formulate in my mind about a stiff with one eye who had been murdered. Anyway to answer your question over the years I have gotten confused especially when I wake up in the morning, about which eye is glass and which is real, as I am lousy with my right and left sides. When I look in the mirror I get even more confused as everything is backwards. So if I really am perplexed and cant solve the mystery I call my Dr. Ol Doc Welby gives me the same answer everytime. He says Pete its your right eye thats a marble and I say Doc youre right again! Good day Sir!
May-11-08  MichAdams: Just one more thing...what's your Christian name?
May-12-08  Lt.Columbo: Hello again MichAdams, to answer your query, my Christian name is Frank. Sir do you have a comment on the level of competition of the Herceg Novi blitz of 1970? A Master once told me that it was his contention that this was the finest collection of Masters ever to sit down at the table in a blitz tournamnet.
May-12-08  Chessdreamer: Incomplete game score, the rest is not available.
Oct-03-08  klangenfarben: According to Kashdan, the blitz tournament featured 12 players, 11 of whom played in the earlier USSR v TROTW. Outside of clear winner Fischer, Tal, Korchnoi, Petrosian, Bronstein, Hort, Matulovic, Smylsov, Reshevsky, Uhlmann, Ivkov and Ostojic participated.
Apr-02-10  thegoodanarchist: Here is the complete Herceg Novi 1970 crosstable:

http://www.bobby-fischer.net/bobby_...

Mar-21-11  newzild: 32. fxg5+ looks pretty bad, as gives Black a central pawn-roller versus an easily-blockaded outside passed pawn.
Dec-06-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: Agree re 32 fg but I'm sure Bronstein was afraid of the 'h' file and the power of Fischer's white squared bishop, say after a black g4..
Mar-06-12  screwdriver: Fischer makes mincemeat of his opponent once again.
Mar-06-12  RookFile: This is a wonderful game, that a master would be proud to play in 40/2, never mind 5 minutes for the whole game.
Mar-06-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: It's a shame that these two only played four games together - and only two non-blitz games.
Nov-23-12  Conrad93: It's a shame how most of the idiots here don't seem to get that this Bronstein is a chess legend.

This was his first loss to Fischer.

This was during Fischer's zenith.

Nov-23-12  Jim Bartle: First and only loss. Against three draws, two in 1958 and 1960 and the other in blitz.
Dec-30-18  ZonszeinP: Bronstein was probably short on time

This is Fischer in his best years

Bronstein was one of the strongest blitz players of all times

Dec-30-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: ...aren't you always short on time in a blitz game?
Dec-31-18  ZonszeinP: It depends.
At the time, not even with 5 minutes Fischer seemed to be short on time. And produced real master pieces (that most of "Sapiens-Sapiens" wouldn't produce in years)

I once read that in 1914 Capablanca beat everybody with only 1 minute on his clock against 5 in his opponents' (wonder wether that's a legend tho)

So.
It sepends on who is playing.

:)

Feb-24-23
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jonathan Sarfati: <ZonszeinP:> Alekhine's obituary of Capablanca said, “he gave ALL the St Petersburg masters the odds of 5–1 in quick games—and won!”

What Alekhine meant by 5–1 odds is not clear. He didn't say 5 minutes to 1 minute, so we can't be sure.

Feb-24-23  Petrosianic: It's very doubtful he meant 5 minutes to 1 minute. Chess clocks in those days were very expensive, and not meant to take the pounding of blitz chess. That's why 10 seconds per was more popular than Blitz into the 40's and 50's. 5:1 could just as easily mean 25 seconds per move vs. 5.
Apr-20-23
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jonathan Sarfati: <Petrosianic:> I agree that it was unlikely to be 1 minute to 5 minutes. All the same, I am not sure about the reasoning. I am old enough to have played lots of games giving 1 minute to 5 minutes odds on analog clocks.

I wonder instead if Alekhine meant money odds: Capa would pay 5 rubles, say if he lost, but would win only 1 ruble if he won.

Apr-20-23
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Jonathan> and <Petrosianic>, you are most likely correct; given Capablanca's reputation as a brilliant rapid player, laying 5-1 against even strong masters would have been the only way to make things interesting.

Dzindzhi was, according to a friend, known to lay 20-1 money odds in the 1980s. Never got to test him at odds--would have liked to have had a go with that number.

Apr-20-23  Petrosianic: Maybe that's it, maybe he meant money odds.

You may be old enough to have played 5:1 on analog clocks, but chess clocks have been fairly inexpensive for a long time. In Capablanca's day they were very expensive.

I don't remember playing 1 minute chess on an analog clock. I remember playing one guy who insisted on giving me 5:2 odds, though. He was better than me, but not THAT much better, so I cleaned up at those odds.

Apr-20-23
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Petrosianic....I remember playing one guy who insisted on giving me 5:2 odds, though....>

Played a series of games with Tal at 5:2 and managed 5/11. Soon after, I played a set of bullet with Ben Finegold; I was fast, but he was quicker.

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: BLITZ. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC