chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Christophe van de Loo vs M Hesseling
"Van de Loo Industries" (game of the day May-11-2009)
Weekend Tournament, Holland (1983)
Italian Game: Two Knights Defense. Traxler Counterattack King March line (C57)  ·  1-0

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
1
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
White to move.
ANALYSIS [x]
Notes by Stockfish 9 v010218 (minimum 30s/ply) 6.Kf1 ± +1.68 (40 ply)= +0.25 (40 ply) 7...Qh4 8.g3 Nxg3 9.hxg3 Qd4+ 10.Kf3 O-O 11.Rh4 e4+ ⩲ +0.56 (28 ply) 8.Nxh8 Qg5+ 9.Kxe4 d5+ 10.Bxd5 Bf5+ 11.Kf3 Bg4+ 12.Kf2 ± +1.67 (21 ply) 8...Rf8 9.Kxe4 Qh4+ 10.g4 d5+ 11.Bxd5 Bxg4 12.Qe1 Bf5+ ⩱ -0.65 (26 ply) 9.d3 Rf8 10.dxe4 d5 11.Bxd5 Ne6 12.Rf1 Rxf7 13.Rxf7 +- +4.07 (29 ply)= 0.00 (31 ply)better is 11...Qf5+ 12.Ke3 Qf4+ 13.Kd3 Qf5+ = 0.00 (36 ply) 12.Bb5+ Nxb5 13.Kc2 Qxf7 14.b3 Qg6+ 15.Kb2 O-O 16.h3 -+ -3.59 (33 ply)-+ -13.05 (36 ply) 18...a6 19.Qg4 Bxg4 20.g3 Qf6 21.Kxd4 Qf2+ 22.Kd3 Bf5+ -+ mate-in-12 19.Qg4 Qf2+ 20.d4 Bxg4 21.Nxc6 a6 22.Kb4 Bd7 23.Nxd8 = -0.41 (22 ply)-+ -11.45 (35 ply) 20...Nxe5 21.Qa6+ Kb8 22.d4 Bd3+ 23.Ka4 Bxa6 24.Rd1 Qd7+ -+ -11.80 (35 ply) 21.Qa6+ Kb8 22.Qxc6 Bd7 23.Qxd7 Rxd7 24.Kc4 c6 25.Kb3 ± +1.51 (36 ply) 21...Qd6 22.Qxc6 Bd7 23.Re1 Bxc6+ 24.dxc6 a6+ 25.Ka4 = 0.00 (41 ply) ⩲ +1.12 (28 ply) 23.Kb4 Nc2+ 24.Ka5 c6 25.Nb5 Qb8 26.Qc5 Qxb5+ 27.Qxb5 ⩲ +1.50 (28 ply)= 0.00 (47 ply) 25.Ka5 Nc6+ 26.Ka4 Nd4+ 27.Ka5 = 0.00 (49 ply) 25...Qd6 26.Na4 Bxa4 27.Ka8 Qb6 28.Qg4+ Nd7 29.Qxa4 Qb7# -+ mate-in-5+- +2.83 (39 ply) 26...Be8 27.Ka8 c5 28.d4 Bxb5 29.dxe5 Bxc4 30.Ka7 Rxd5 ± +2.23 (38 ply)better is 27.dxc6 Rd4 28.Re1 Qc5+ 29.Ka8 Qxc4 30.Re8+ Rd8 31.Rxd8+ +- +6.87 (40 ply) 27...Qe7+ 28.Kb6 Qb7+ 29.Ka5 Rxd5 30.Kb4 Kd7 31.a4 Be6 ± +2.17 (41 ply)+- +12.92 (36 ply) 33.Bf4 Na6 34.Rae1 Qc5 35.Rc1 Qb4 36.c7+ Nxc7+ 37.Bxc7+ +- +6.76 (36 ply) 33...Qb4+ 34.Ka8 Kc7 35.Bf4+ Qxf4 36.b4 Qxb4 37.Rhb1 -+ mate-in-6+- +7.67 (35 ply)+- mate-in-26 after 39.Rf1+ Ke8 40.Nc8 Qe5 41.Nd6+ Qxd6 42.Rxd6 Ke748...Kf8 49.Rxg4 Rxc6 50.bxc6 Ke7 51.c8=Q+ Kf6 52.Rb5 +- mate-in-61-0

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
FEN COPIED

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [35435 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more C van de Loo/M Hesseling game
sac: 31.Qxd5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can learn a lot about this site (and chess in general) by reading the Chessgames Help Page. If you need help with premium features, please see the Premium Membership Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-03-13  s0030135: In fact,white missed a mate in 3 by Re7+ on the 48th move.
Nov-26-13  pattydee: I love White's 19.Qa4 ( 19.Qg3 and White gets mated quickly after 19...Qd4+).

I disagree with King Death's comment that if 19...ab: 20.Nc6: is good for White. All I see after 20.Nc6:?? is 20...Qc4# 0-1.

A wild and crazy game. I feel sorry for players who avoid these crazy complications. They're missing a lot of fun.

Apr-21-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  scutigera: I have no idea why people sneer at this game just because it was composed rather than played -- problems are composed, and generally much less realistic. As Max Euwe said about Morphy's Opera Box Game, "While displaying no particularly deep planning, this game possesses an uncommon charm." There's room in chess for charm, I hope. Composed games, labelled as such of course, are a perfectly respectable way to enjoy it.
May-25-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  MJCB: The game - even if composed - is nice to enjoy, like R Steel vs NN, 1886 - also suspected to be a composition and also staging a hunted king turning hunter.
May-25-14  number 23 NBer: <pattydee> After 19...bxa4, the pawn no longer defends c4, so 20 Nxc6 can't be met by Qc4+, as that simply hangs the queen.
Aug-04-16  pumping707: What a wild game...kudos to white...still won the game.
Aug-15-16  Zhbugnoimt: Ridiculous composition, but extremely fun. Full of black missing mates though.
Oct-25-16  whiteshark: "The white player surely exists, he was an old clubmate of mine.

<The game however was invented by him.> He is/was probably one of the greatest connaisseurs of the Traxler-variation, certainly in The Netherlands.

You won't find his name in the database though, because <after he joined Baghwan <<<<>>>>> he had his name changed. <The black player doesn't exist.">

-- FM CountOfMonteCristo

https://www.chess.com/blog/benws/va...

Apr-25-17  7he5haman: What an amazing game!
Dec-04-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  ketchuplover: 49...Re2+ looks interesting to me
Feb-21-18  morfishine: This has to be the craziest chess game ever, but I have this nagging doubt that engine(s) would define the soundness (or unsoundness) of the posted move sequence. Please don't, just leave this one like this forever

*****

Feb-21-18  ChessHigherCat: Great game and/or composition but I think Chris could've stopped'M Hessling him a little sooner with 41. Rec7 Re5 42. Rc8+ Re8 43. Rxe8+ Kxe8 44. c7. He would have spotted it if he had come back van de Loo like Kramnik did in toiletgate.
Apr-04-18  JSYantiss: <ketchuplover> 49...Re2+ is not possible.
May-11-18  whiteshark: <The Most Ridiculous Chess Game You'll Ever See> GM Niclas Huschenbeth has analysed this game here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWi... (~ 16 mins)

Enjoy watching it w/ 1.25x speed ;)!!

May-11-18  whiteshark: <19.Qa4!! "Probably the most stunning theoretical novelty on record." -- Soltis>


click for larger view

White to move

Even / better is ...

1) -0.41 (22 ply) <19.Qg4!!> Qf2+ 20.d4 Bxg4 21.Nxc6 a6 22.Kb4 Bd7 23.Nxd8 Qxd4+ 24.Ka5 Kxd8 25.Re1 b4 26.Be3 Qc4 27.b3 Qxc3 28.Rad1 Qb2 29.Kxb4 a5+ 30.Kc4 Qxg2 31.Rd2 Qe4+ 32.Kc3 Qe5+ 33.Rd4 Qxh2 34.Bd2 Bf5 35.b4 Qd6 36.Kb2 axb4 37.Bxb4

2) -0.91 (21 ply) 19.Qa4 bxa4 20.Nxc6 Bd3 21.b3 Rd6 22.Nxa7+ Kb7 23.Nc6 Ka8 24.g3 Qf6 25.Kb4 Rxc6 26.dxc6 Qd6+ 27.Kxa4 Qxc6+ 28.Ka3 Qxh1 29.Bb2 Qxh2 30.Re1 Qxd2 31.Re5 Kb8 32.Rc5 Qe3 33.Na4 Qe7 34.b4 Qd6 35.Bxg7

3) mated-in-6 (21 ply) 19.Kxc6 Qb4 20.Ne4 Qd4 21.Kxb5 Rxd5+ 22.Nc5 Rxc5+ 23.Ka6 Qb4 24.Kxa7 Ra5#

15.0 minute analysis by Stockfish 9 v010218

Sep-17-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: "The Dumbest Chess Game Ever Played"

GothamChess has a look, apparently unaware it's a composition.

https://youtu.be/7S5Plq6RC24

Jan-24-22  LoveThatJoker: Along with <Whiteshark's> note from 2016, <sneaky pete's> post from 2005 (on page one of this game's comments) proves to me that this indeed was a composition. Heck of a composition, however!

NM Sam Copeland does a great job of video annotating this game on his "Best Games of the 1980s" lesson-series for chess.com.

LTJ

PS. For the record, here is sneaky pete's note from 2005,

"First published as "Blood-curdling chess" with notes by the "winner", Christophe van de Loo, in <Schakend Nederland>, March, 1984. "In one of those obscure English weekend tournaments last year, I played ... ". Black is given as a certain M. Hesseling from Germany. "Black's resignation after this (move 48.Rxg7..) was an annoying formality, that we both had rather left undone. It had, after all, been a thing of beauty which we had concocted together. Nothing is as fascinating as that which is absolutely irrelevant. Yes, maybe there is: the relevance in its best moments. But which best moments: that of the relevance or that of the fascination? "

Van de Loo had studied "The real American Wilkes-Barre variation" by Kenneth F. Williams and after 18... Nc6 (winning, according to Williams) had found 19.Qa4 .. (overlooked by Williams). As he realized it was very unlikely he would ever have an opportunity to play this novelty, he dreamt up this game, possibly with the help of his friend Hesseling".

Oct-14-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: <Van de Loo had studied "The real American Wilkes-Barre variation" by Kenneth F. Williams and after 18... Nc6 (winning, according to Williams) had found 19.Qa4 .. (overlooked by Williams). As he realized it was very unlikely he would ever have an opportunity to play this novelty, he dreamt up this game, possibly with the help of his friend Hesseling".>

Unfortunately, <sneaky pete> omitted to give us his source for this.

Oct-15-22  sneaky pete: I am the source, that should be enough.
Oct-15-22  stone free or die: <sneaky pete> Ha, channeling you inner <MissScarlett>!
Oct-15-22  whiteshark: <sneaky pete: I am the source, that should be enough.> Knowing myself, I would not go that far. ;)
Oct-16-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: I think it's safe to say that Hess' had his head in the Loo.
Oct-16-22  Chessius the Messius: I don't think so. "The Loo" actually is a Dutch palace.

https://paleishetloo.nl/

Jun-15-23
Premium Chessgames Member
  fredthebear: The May-11-18 youtube link above provided by the great <whiteshark> still works. GM Niclas Huschenbeth's analysis was clear enough.

This game is wild and crazy, but much of the clashing discord is due to the tactical nature of the opening. White chose 6.KxBf2?! and the king walk began. There are a handful ridiculous-looking moves, many questionable, most made for a fair enough reason (chess is a game of choices), but the entire game is certainly not ridiculous IMHO. Other pages first come to mind as ridiculous.

Black probably should have won.

Jun-15-23  Rdb: Move 48 , white to move - a Monday puzzle
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 5)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC