chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Magnus Carlsen vs Vladimir Kramnik
Corus Group A (2010), Wijk aan Zee NED, rd 9, Jan-26
Catalan Opening: Open Defense (E04)  ·  0-1

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
1
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
White to move.
ANALYSIS [x]
Notes by Stockfish 9 v010218 (minimum 6s/ply)better is 7.Qc1 Nc6 8.Qxc4 Qd5 9.Qd3 Qf5 10.Qxf5 exf5 11.a3 Be7 = +0.38 (28 ply)= -0.35 (22 ply)better is 8...Bxc3 9.bxc3 Nbd7 10.O-O Ra7 11.Re1 b6 12.e4 c5 = -0.27 (22 ply)= +0.28 (23 ply)better is 15...Qb8 16.O-O Qb5 17.axb4 Qxe2 18.Qxe2 Bxe2 19.Rfe1 = -0.31 (24 ply)= +0.39 (23 ply) 17...Bb5 18.Rfd1 Qc7 19.axb4 axb4 20.dxe6 fxe6 21.Qe4 = +0.12 (23 ply) 18.Rfd1 Bb7 19.Nh4 Ne5 20.Nf5 Re8 21.Bxd5 Bxd5 22.Ne3 ⩲ +1.46 (21 ply)better is 18...Rc7 19.Bf5 Ne5 20.Nh4 Ng6 21.Bxg6 hxg6 22.Nxg6 fxg6 = 0.00 (22 ply) ⩲ +0.52 (20 ply)better is 26.Rdc1 Rh5 27.Bg4 Rhh6 28.Nxc5 Bxc5 29.Qxe5+ f6 30.Qf5 = +0.21 (26 ply) ⩱ -0.52 (24 ply) 31.Nc5 Qd5 32.Qf3 Qxf3 33.exf3 d3 34.Nxd3 cxd3 35.Rxd3 ⩱ -0.56 (26 ply) ⩱ -1.45 (24 ply) 32...Kg8 33.Qf4 Qd5 34.f3 Qe6 35.Rxd4 Rxe2 36.Rd6 Re1+ ∓ -1.57 (25 ply)better is 33.Qf4 Qd5 34.e4 Qxe4 35.Qxe4 Rxe4 36.Nc5 Re5 37.Ra7+ = -0.20 (24 ply) ⩱ -0.92 (24 ply) 34.Re1 Qd4 35.Qd2 Ke6 36.Qxb4 d2 37.Red1 Qxe4 38.Nc5+ ⩱ -0.67 (23 ply) 34...Rxe4 35.Qa7+ Ke8 36.Qc5 Qd5 37.Qxd5 Bxd5 38.Nb6 Be6 ∓ -1.60 (27 ply) 35.Re1 Bb7 36.Qc5+ Qd6 37.Qxc4 d2 38.Rxe5+ Bxe5 39.Qe2 = -0.23 (23 ply)-+ -7.51 (25 ply)38...Bd4 39.Rfe1 Bxf2+ 40.Kf1 Bxe1 41.Qh4+ Ke8 42.Qh8+ -+ mate-in-100-1

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 50 times; par: 52 [what's this?]

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [35437 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 69 more Carlsen/Kramnik games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 14 OF 14 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-09-10  Atking: <(and btw 15...Qb8 is indeed noted as a good move by Lebedev in his analysis - see the crestbook link posted by <polarmis>).> Oh I see. I should check all the posts before that will make my work more easy. Thanks for the link

<15. ... Qb8 is an interesting option as well. The point is that after 16. O-O Qb5 Black is threatening ... b3 and so White is forced to take on b4. 15. ... Qb8 16.0-0 Qb5 17.axb4 Qxe2 18.Qxe2 Bxe2 19.Rfe1 Bxf3 20.Bxf3 Bxb4 21.Rec1 Nb8 22.Bxc6 Nxc6 23.Rxc6 Rac8 24.d5 exd5 25.Rxf6 d4 26.Rd1 Rfd8 27.Rf3 Be7 28.Rf5 Rc2 (+0.13 @ depth 22; FireBird 1.01)> Thanks for the try Hesam7. This line looks indeed very equal. I thought 17...axb keeping the queen on the board but your idea Qxe2&BxNf3! ends with a passed pawn and a B>=Na4 and is interesting too. Still I don't understand your last moves 27...Be7 why not simply Rc6? Another idea is Rc4 instead of d4 with Rb8 to block this Na4.

Feb-09-10  polarmis: It's interesting that Lebedev doesn't mention 18...Bb7 either - he just says: <If you give up the pawn on d5 then its clear that black's opening strategy has suffered a complete collapse> (he gives a line with 18...Nb6 and says it's too bad for words).

It's maybe systematic of Lebedev's style. Despite the obvious depth of his analysis he does tend to skip "duller" sidelines. For instance on Kramnik's 29...c4 he doesn't analyse the computer suggestions but just says: <Rybka keeps insisting on playing 29...Rc7 Coward!> :)

Mar-09-10  soothsayer8: Carlsen kinda got slapped around that game, notice Kramnik didn't even move his queen until the third to last move!
Jun-11-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: <achieve>First loss for Carlsen in a VERY long time...

<achieve>,
Carlsen's first loss in 36 games.

Jun-26-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: I think this was the last time VK beat Carlsen; he beat Magnus twice in 2010, both times with black. Clearly, the Vladimator still has the goods. Can he stay motivated enough to make it successfully through the Candidates matches?
Nov-04-10  checkmateyourmove: this loss still impressed me of magnus's play, to have ur knight pinned all game against the wall and still have chances in the opening, is credit to his vision.
Dec-26-10  notyetagm: http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail...
Jun-02-11  wordfunph: game sidelight..

<Magnus Carlsen often comes to the board just after getting up. When he spent two minutes on his first move against Kramnik at Wijk aan Zee 2010 "he had his eyes closed," the Russian said. "I thought maybe I should wake him up.">

(Chess Life June 2011)

Sep-16-11  voyager39: So this is the proxy Kasparov vs Kramnik revenge game which resulted in the end of the Carlsen-Kasparov collaboration!!

http://www.nettavisen.no/sjakk/arti...

(Google translate will give a fairly understandable english version)

Jan-08-13  notyetagm: Carlsen vs Kramnik, 2010


click for larger view

17 d4-d5!!


click for larger view

Feb-14-13  Kaspablanca: It is true that Carlsen post in his facebook profile that he will crush Kramnik like a bug before this game?
Feb-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  blazerdoodle: I thought the kid had more class than that, but in spirit of the modern age......
Feb-23-13  morfishine: Kramnik will need to play like this to get by Carlsen in the upcoming Candidates
Mar-01-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  blazerdoodle: <Can he stay motivated enough to make it successfully through the Candidates matches?> Kramnik plays for that beautiful subtle and mysterious thing that lays hidden, which doesn't show itself very often. Anand can be like that. I think maybe Carlsen too... though Carlsen is still new to me -
Mar-01-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  blazerdoodle: I'm must a woodpusher, very very far down the food chain in the guppy tank, but these guys games amaze me.
Apr-05-14  SpiritedReposte: Kramnik just gives away pieces and pawns like nothing here.
Jan-30-15  fisayo123: 29...c4!! A bolt from the blue. Kramnik the Great at his most incandescent. Carlsen was playing a great game until then but still that wasn't good enough. For instance 33.e4! is such a deadly, decietful move.
Mar-18-15  Conrad93: It's not wise to play the Catalan against a Catalan master like Kramnik. Then again, this guy is an expert in almost every opening.
Mar-18-15  Conrad93: I'm no Catalan expert, but why is 11. Qb3 better than 11. Qd3?

Is it because of 11...Ba6?

Mar-18-15  Nerwal: 11. ♕d3 : Grischuk vs Aronian, 2010
Mar-20-15  Conrad93: <Nerwal: 11. ♕d3 : Grischuk vs Aronian, 2010>

Thanks. Hard to believe there are only two games with 10...b5, but 11. Qd3 looks better according to the Grischuk game, even if it was just rapid.

Jan-18-20  dumbgai: One of many interesting games between Carlson and Kramnik. Here the new world number one at the time tries to defeat Kramnik using his own opening. However it didn’t go too well.
Jan-18-20  Messiah: Ouch! :-)
Jan-18-20  Kaspablanca: I was praying Kramnik win the last csndidates tournament he played so we would be witneses of a great Kramnik-Carlsen match, i m sure there would be few draws
Apr-30-24  dehanne: The folly of youth.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 14)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 14 OF 14 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC