chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Borislav Ivkov vs Robert James Fischer
Second Piatigorsky Cup (1966), Santa Monica, CA USA, rd 3, Jul-20
Indian Game: King's Indian. Fianchetto Variation (A49)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 11 times; par: 67 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 11 more Ivkov/Fischer games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can learn a lot about this site (and chess in general) by reading the Chessgames Help Page. If you need help with premium features, please see the Premium Membership Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-05-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: While Fischer's well-known antipathy towards 1.d4 and the openings arising therefrom until 1970 was legend, he provides a masterly example of how to play a classic minority attack (with reversed colours) in this game.
Mar-06-06  RookFile: Black really owned everything. Normally when black plays these types of setups, his minority attack on the queenside is to some degree counterbalanced by white having greater control over e5. That doesn't happen here: Fischer has both knights AND his bishop watching e5 while also undertaking the minority attack.
Jul-15-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Going into this game, Fischer's score against Ivkov was +0-2=3; from this game forward it was +4-0=1.
Dec-12-14  zydeco: Ivkov's self-lacerating notes to this game are amusing.

6.Nc3: "A man will sometimes ask himself after a game why he did not play the normal, 'classical' moves. Really, why is not the better move 6.c4, which I had been playing in innumerable games up to the present? I wanted to get away from the prepared variations of my young opponent - that would be the only explanation for the inferior move 6.Nc3. I would say with astonishment that to a reasonable extent I succeeded - the position which I obtained from the opening was actually better."

Ivkov is following a Spassky-Bronstein game through to move 14 when he deviated with the inferior 14.N4d3.

14.N4d3: "I thought that Bobby would not give up one of his bishops, due to his known love for these pieces. But Bobby always plays the strongest moves regardless of favorites."

20.Bf3: "....The move in this position is 20.a4 to delay black's advance on the queenside. It is not clear to me why I did not play it. Moreover, it is not clear how I could find so many weak moves in one game. It seems that such things happen."

22.Qe2: "A move without sense."

24.Be5: "Less harmful would be 24.Be5."

36.Rf3: "The last error - thank God!"

42.White resigns: "Fischer, with his fine technique, took advantage of the poor play of his opponent."

May-14-15  Howard: Fischer either played a Closed Sicilian against Ivkov or a KI Reversed---it's a bit debatable as to which name to use.

For the record, Evans referred to it as a KI Reversed in a 1978 column of his.

Apr-12-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: Regarding "24.Be5: "Less harmful would be 24.Be5."" in comments below by Ivkov

If he meant instead 24.Ne5 then black has Nxd4 as after cxd4 there is Qxd6

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC