chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Alisa Galliamova vs Christopher Lutz
Pula Open (1997), Pula CRO, rd 7, May-??
Dutch Defense: Semi-Leningrad Variation (A81)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 7 times; par: 57 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more A Galliamova/C Lutz game
sac: 24...Rxe3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can suggest a game for Guess-the-Move with the Guess-the-Move Suggestion Queue.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Dec-07-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: 24...Rxe3 is called a double Lutz.
Dec-07-13  abuzic: 24...Rxe3
White can try 25.Ra2 Qd4 26.fxe3

<26.Kh2 Nxf2 27.Raxf2 Qg4 28.Nf3 Qxg3+! 29.Kg1

<(29.Kxg3? leads to forced mate 29...Be5+ 30.Kh4 Re4+ 31.Kg5 Rg4+ 32.Kh6 Bf4+ 33.Ng5 Rh4#)>

29...Bd3 30.Rd1 Rexf3 31.Rxf3 Rxf3 32.Qe7 Bd4+ 33.Kh1 Rf4>

26...Qxe3+ 27.Kh2 Qxg5 28.Rxf5 Qh6+ 29.Bh3 Rxf5, threat ...Nf4, ...Rh5 black is lost.

Dec-07-13  diagonalley: nah! ... i tried 24 ... NxP 25 BxN B-Q6 but it wasn't good enough
Dec-07-13  morfishine: While this was more straightforward than yesterday's POTD, I still managed to vary on the second move: 24...Rxe3 25.fxe3 and here all my effort went into <25...Qe2>


click for larger view

I thought this was strong for Black since the Black Queen has access to <h5> (with the idea of freeing up the DSB) while threatening 26...Qxe3+

Unfortunately, the more I looked, the more resources White had to hold :(

*****

Dec-07-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: I thought it was WHITE to move. If it was, I got ideas of 1.Ne6.
Dec-07-13  thegoodanarchist: What a great finish. I hate the Dutch Defense, but it sure served Lutz very well in this game.

When I play blitz on Gameknot.com, if my opponent plays the Dutch I will cancel the game about half the time. It is ugly to me.

Dec-07-13  thegoodanarchist: < Penguincw: I thought it was WHITE to move.>

LOL yeah we have all been there...

Dec-07-13  abuzic: 24...Rxe3
white better not accept the R sac but will reach an endgame wiht inferior position: 25.Rab1 Qe2 26.Rb7 Bf6 27.Rf7 Re7 28.Rxe7 Qxe7 29.Qxe7 Bxe7 30.Ne4 Kg7,


click for larger view

a piece up black can win this endgame

Dec-07-13  Patriot: White is up a pawn, so 24...Qxa1 25.Rxa1 Bxa1 isn't so appealing. Black seems to have a much stronger attack so a draw is probably not the best result.

The best I'm finding is 24...Rxe3.

25.fxe3 Qe2 26.Ne6 Qxe3+ 27.Kh2 Qh6+ 28.Kg1 Qe3+ at least draws.

25.fxe3 Qe2 26.Ne6 Qxe3+ 27.Kh2 Be5 28.Rf3 looks better for white.

25.fxe3 Bh6 26.Ne6 Bxe3+ 27.Kh2 and the way forward is not clear.

I'll go with 24...Rxe3, but I don't see a win.

Dec-07-13  Patriot: I forgot one line:

24...Rxe3 25.fxe3 Qe2 26.Rf3 Ne1 27.Rf2 Qxe3 which looks good for black.

Dec-07-13  Patriot: I was way off. 25...Qe2 26.Qe7 is a simple defense that wins. And my last line, the simple 27.Rxe1 wins.

Despite my efforts, this is some of the worst analysis.

Dec-07-13  morfishine: <Patriot> Yes, I also wandered down 25...Qe2 26.Qe7

24...Rxe3 25.fxe3 Qe2 26.Qe7 Ne5 27.Rae1 Qh5 28.Nf3 Bf6 29.Qxd6 Ng4 30.e4 Rd8 31.Qxc5 Rc8 32.Qa3 Rc3 33.Qa2 Bc8 34.d6+ Kh7 35.Qf7+ Kh6 36.Qf8+ Bg7 37.Qf4+ Kh7 38.e5 Rxf3 39.Rxf3 Qh2+ 40.Kf1 Ba6+ 41.Re2 Bxe2+ 42.Kxe2 Qxg2+ 43.Kd1 Nxe5 44.Qh4+ Kg8


click for larger view

It looks White should take the repeat 45.Qd8+ Kh7 46.Qh4+ Kg8 (or this looks interesting 46...Bh6 47.Qe7+ Bg7 48.Rf4 Qd5+). There's no way I could see this far, so had to turn to my trust PGN editor :)

*****

Dec-07-13  shivasuri4: <Patriot>, 24...Qxa1 is a blunder, as the bishop can't recapture, owing to the mating threat on h7.
Dec-07-13  kevin86: The rook will go as the pawn at c2 is immune owing to the knight fork.
Dec-07-13  agb2002: Black is one pawn down.

Black has five pieces to attack the white castle. This suggests 24... Nxf2:

A) 25.Bxf2 Bd3

A.1) 26.Ne6 Rf7 27.Nc7 (27.Qa5 Bc3 28.Rab1 Bxb1 29.Qb5 Rb8 30.Qxb2 Rxb2 - + [R vs N]) 27... Bxf1 28.Rxf1 Ree7 or 28... Re2 looks winning.

A.2) 26.Nh3 Bxf1 27.Rxf1 c4 looks good for Black. For example, 28.a5 c3 29.Bd4 Rxf1+ 30.Bxf1 Bxd4 30.Qxd4 Qd2 31.Qxd2 cxd2 32.Nf2 Re1 33.a6 d1=Q 34.Nxd1 Rxd1 followed by Ra1 and Kg7-f6-e5, etc.

A.3) 26.a5 Bxf1 27.Rxf1 Re2 also seems to be good for Black. For example, 28.Ne4 (28.Ne6 Rxf2 29.Qxg7+ Qxg7 30.Nxg7 Rxf1+ 31.Bxf1 Kxg7 is similar to A.2) 28... Bd4 29.Ng5 Bxf2+ 30.Rxf2 (30.Kh1 Qg7) 30... Re1+ 31.Kh2 (31.Bf1 Qxf2+; 31.Rf1 Rexf1+ 32.Kh2 (32.Bxf1 Qf2+ 33.Kh1 Qxf1+ 34.Kh2 Rf2#) 32... Qh8+ 33.Nh3 (33.Bh3 R8f2#) 33... R1f7 - +) 31... Qh8+ 32.Nh3 (32.Bh3 Rxf2#) 32... Rxf2 - +.

B) 25.Rae1 Ng4 looks bad for White due to the weakness of the diagonal a7-g1.

Dec-07-13  agb2002: 24... Nxf2 25.Bxf2 Bd3 seems to fail due to the maneuver 26.Qd7 followed by Qh3, defending and attacking at the same time.

I saw 24... Rxe3 25.fxe3 Qe5 but had the impression that it was insufficient.

Better luck tomorrow.

Dec-07-13  Patriot: <morf> Good job in finding the 26.Qe7 defense. If there isn't already a principle, there should be one here. "Whenever material is sacrificed, look for a simple defense first." Because if your opponent can simply hold on with extra material and as long as you don't have a strong attack, you should be lost. Seeing a simple defense would have saved me a lot of time.

<<shivasuri4>: <Patriot>, 24...Qxa1 is a blunder, as the bishop can't recapture, owing to the mating threat on h7.> Very true. I only noticed that even if the sequence went 24...Qxa1 25.Rxa1 Bxa1 (without a mate threat) it still looked bad for black because of extra material for white. That was enough to dismiss it before I got to the mate threat.

Dec-07-13  abuzic: After
24...Rxe3
25.fxe3 Qe5 <25...Qe2 is actually bad for black after 26.Qe7 Ne5 27.Rae1 Qh5 28.Ne6 Rf7 29.Qxd6 Bf6 white dominates, and can even give the Q for 3 minor pieces like: 30.g4 Qxg4 31.e4 Qg3 32.exf5 Nf3+ 33.Rxf3 Qxd6 34.fxg6 Bd4+ 35.Nxd4 Rxf3 36.Nxf3 Qxd5 37.Re1+ Kg7 38.Rf7+ Kg8 39.Kf2>


click for larger view

26.e4 looks the safest defence; for other lines:

A) 26.Kh1 Qxe3 27.Ne6 Qh6+ 28.Kg1 Bxa1 29.Rxa1 Bxe6 30.Qe7 <30.dxe6 Qe3+ 31.Kh2 Nf2> 30...Bf5


click for larger view

black is clearly winning

B) 26.Ne6 Qxe3+ 27.Kh1 <27.Kh2 Bxa1 28.Rxa1? Nf2+> 27...Be5 28.Rf3 Qh6+ 29.Kg1 Bxa1 30.Nxf8? Bd4+

C) 26.Nf3 Qxe3+ 27.Kh2 Ne5 28.Rad1 Ng4+ 29.Kh1 <29.Kh3 Be5> Qh6+ 30.Nh4 Bf6

D) 26.Kh2 Qxe3 27.Nf3 Ne5 flollowed by ...Ng4+

E) 26.Ne4 Bh6 27.Kh2 Bxe3 28.Rxf5 Qh8+ 29.Bh3 Qb2+ 30.Nf2 gxf5

Dec-07-13  whiteshark: He did sac the exchange for the lulz.
Dec-07-13  Patriot: <agb2002> Not that I did well at all, but you missed something really big in A.1). 27.Qxf7+! Kxf7 28.Bd4+. Also 26...Rxf2 was possible. I thought your line 24...Nxf2 was interesting, but as you pointed out 25.Bxf2 Bd3 26.Qd7 - a simple (but not so easy to see) defense makes all the difference. So maybe the principle "Whenever material is sacrificed, look for a simple defense first." would have saved you a lot of time as well.
Dec-07-13  agb2002: Thank you <Patriot>. It must be some kind of psychological problem because I was convinced that the logical 24... Rxe3, weakening the dark squares around the white kind, was a red herring.
Dec-07-13  Diademas: Not even close.
Dec-07-13  patzer2: Amazingly strong play by both sides after Black's 24...Rxe3!! demolition of pawn structure tactic solution to this Saturday puzzle.

Ran it through my computer (Fritz 12 on a dual core processor laptop) and came up without even a slight improvement for either side until White's 39th move.

By then White was clearly lost and any alternative (e.g. 39. Rb1 Nf4+ ) would've made no difference.

Dec-07-13  patzer2: < I was convinced that the logical 24... Rxe3, weakening the dark squares around the white kind, was a red herring.>

Maybe Black saw all this, but I wonder if 24...Rxf3!! wasn't simply played as an attacking positional move.

Perhaps Black simply calculated 24...Rxe3!! 25. fxe3 Qe5 weakening White's pawn structure, winning a pawn and putting strong pressure on the weakened King position offered a winning advantage.

Dec-09-13  thegoodanarchist: < chrisowen> Two humongous posts of your "odd speak", to coin a phrase?

You need a new hobby, man!

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC