chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Siegbert Tarrasch vs Christian Kelz
"Rook To His Laurels" (game of the day Apr-24-2007)
Nuremberg (1892) (unorthodox), Nuremberg GER
King's Gambit: Accepted. Allgaier Gambit Thorold Attack (000)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

find similar games 3 more Tarrasch/C Kelz games
sac: 6.Nxf7 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To see the raw PGN for this game, click on the PGN: view link above.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
May-28-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: Chessgames.com, according to Tarrasch's "Dreihundert Schachpartien" white played this game without Ra1.
May-29-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  chessgames.com: Thanks Honza, all the more impressive!
Apr-24-07  xequemate: It was custom in this time the masters plays against amateurs without some piece (normally the rook).
Apr-24-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Tarrasch blundered--he should have played 15.Nc3 to complete his development.
Apr-24-07  asmama: either way, he is winng for sure. nice game
Apr-24-07  dabearsrock1010: <An Englishman:> agreed. Nc3 is a much better mate. If he was only as good at chess as you or me he would have played more accurately.
Apr-24-07  Bare Beginner: I am in love with the new "Guess the move" feature. A vibrant added means for chess to take over my life!
Apr-24-07  outplayer: What would be Kelz rating nowadays?
Apr-24-07  essekids: A subtle reminder to watch out for "free" gifts of pawns and space.
Apr-24-07  kapabl: <An Englishman> and <dabearsrock1010>: Of course Tarrasch could have learnt something from us. But he seems to have been good at showing off - that he did not need the knight to mate :)
Apr-24-07  kevin86: A typical 19th C game. Here we have a rook odds,Allgaier Gambit,and more sacs sprinkled along the way. The king is hunted,trapped,and captured.

The rook odds is just window dressing,as it turns out,with the knight unmoved.

Apr-24-07  Chessmensch: With due respect to Tarrasch its not so much that he won as that Kelz lost.
Apr-24-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <chessmensch> Sure, any beginner could have found Rxf5 and Bf7 with his eyes shut.
Apr-24-07  tatarch: 12. ? white to play actually would make a pretty good puzzle here, even though black doesn't necessarily have to take the rook.
Apr-24-07  BadTemper: this game is as interesting as golf tv.

its just like bruce pandolfini's article this month in Chess Life Magazine, where he annotates, Morphy vs Schullen, or however you spell it. What a rehashed piece of garbage. I have no respect for that kind of laziness, that he can't find something new to publish....

Apr-24-07  twin phoenix: was truly surprised to see Tarrasch play the kings gambit. He called 2. f4 a 'suicide move'in his book. but when i saw he had given rook odds then i knew he was playing a beginner and so it makes a fun choice.

i completely disagree with badtemper. i may end up using this gambit in the future as i love to play the K's gambit. (especially in speed.) personnally i love watching people play in the style of Morphy (as Tarrasch does here.) "what is more satisfying in chess than when subtle powers of the mind overwhelm a material advantage?" forgot who the person was i'm quoting there but indeed tactics are what make the game intersting! (and keep it that way for years to come...)

Apr-24-07  Skylark: I have a 2000 elo, and the only move I have ever played against 1. ... e5 is 2. f4 (of which I have only ever lost one game out of more than 10, and conceded only 2 draws). The game I lost was against a 2300 player, and the others mostly range from 1800-2100. Just goes to show that with a bit of research, and a good 'feel' for the position, the King's Gambit can be just as strong a weapon as the Ruy.

Admittedly I avoid playing the Ruy because I think that the Marshall Gambit leads to dynamic equality, and who wants to let black activate his pieces in the Ruy Lopez, when normally he has to meander about in a cramped position? I also don't have enough confidence playing the Anti-Marshall lines. So until the King's Gambit is _properly_ refuted (and although I don't think the Fischer defense really refutes 1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3, I play 3. Bc4 anyway) then I'll continue to play it and enjoy the success it brings me. I think it is one of the most underestimated openings of modern chess.

Jul-12-07  frank124c: i like the king's gambit because it leads to lively, tactical games--bobby fischer was certainly deluded when he thought he had "busted" the king's gambit--maybe he had a bad case of chessophrenia.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: UNORTHODOX. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC