chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Emanuel Lasker vs Siegbert Tarrasch
Lasker - Tarrasch (1916), Berlin GER, rd 6, Dec-10
Spanish Game: Open. Open Variation (C80)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 8 times; par: 55 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 29 more Lasker/Tarrasch games
sac: 14.Rxd5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you do not want to read posts by a certain member, put them on your ignore list.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-09-04  WhoKeres: This was game 6 of the ill-fated Lasker Tarrasch WC match in 1916. The first game was drawn, then Lasker won five straight and Tarrasch abandoned the match. Tarrasch was competitive with white, but simply totally horrible with black. Can anyone provide some insight into why the second match was played, particularly from Tarrasch's point of view, since tournament results of this era didn't seem to indicate he should have got a shot at the title while more worthy players such as Capablanca, Rubinstein, and even Schlechter had to wait. I also understand that two of Tarrasch's sons had recently died, one in WW1, and one by suicide, which may have explained his poor form.
Jun-09-04  iron maiden: <WhoKeres> The match consisted of only six games (Tarrasch did not "abandon" it). It was also a non-title match (Lasker was not staking the WC title), and if I can remember correctly it was actually a non-profit match, with the proceeds going to a now-forgotten war charity.
Jun-09-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: It was not a World Championship match. There was a little thing called World War I going between 1914 and 1918. With no tournaments in Europe, Tarrasch and Lasker decided to play a match. Tragedy struck Tarrasch who lost all three of his sons 1914-1916. A more serious loss than the match.
Jan-27-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: By the time of this match I suppose Tarrasch and Lasker were getting on all right.
May-10-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: The world-record holder for a rook reaching e4 in a serious game: move 8.
May-10-06  percyblakeney: ...almost: Knorre vs J Minckwitz, 1880
Aug-16-07  Karpova: Koltanowski also thought this was a WC match and claimed Tarrasch tried to take the title from Lasker. So Winter asked <‘When was the second time?’> as there was only one WC match (in 1908).

Now it became quite funny when Schiller tried to defend Koltanowski's honour by accusing Winter of denying a match in 1916 altogether. He even called Winter <some whining lad who can’t even get the facts right.’> and went on calling him <Young Salieri>.

The whole story:
http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

Oct-06-08  dwavechess: Rybka 3 agrees with 16/18 moves at min. per move with Lasker. Last 12 moves concur with Rybka.
Oct-30-08  ughaibu: Black rook to e4 on move 8: Capablanca vs E Corzo, 1901
Jan-29-11  Llawdogg: This looks like about half of a game. May I have some more, please?
Mar-06-13  TheFocus: The final moves are: 18...Re8 19.Qxf7 Re7 20.Qg8+ Kd7 21.Nb6+ Kc6 22.Nxa4 Qb5 23.Qc8+ Kd6 24.b3 Qe2 25.Qc5+ Kd7 26.h3 Ke8 27.c3 Rf7 28.Rf1 Rf5 29.Qc8+ Ke7 30.Nc5 Kf7 31.Qxa6 Qe8 32.Qc4+ Kf6 33.g4 Rf4 34.g5+ 1-0
Feb-21-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Soltis indicates the game ends after 18.Nxa8, which I assume is just an error.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 72, Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis
from -ER Lasker by fredthebear
Game 72, Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis
from Short games by masters by rbaglini
simonepierini's Ruy Lopez
by simonepierini
72
from Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by Incremental
The Great Lasker
from Games Rybka likes! by dwavechess
Game collection: 8
by p2c
Game 72, Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis
from Spaniards Settin' Sail by fredthebear
B: Open. Open Variation
from Ruy Lopez: Open, 5 0-0 Nxe4 by imsighked2
Match Lasker!
by amadeus
September / Octoer, p. 152 [Game 97 / 3784]
from American Chess Bulletin 1920 by Phony Benoni
lasker best games
by brager
Game 72, Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis
from Emanuel Lasker Collection by hrannar
Game 72
from Why Lasker Matters (Soltis) by Qindarka
72
from Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by StoppedClock
72
from Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by keypusher


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC