chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Rabindranath Mesias Rojas vs Luis Rojas Keim
"The War of the Rojases" (game of the day Oct-20-2020)
Fenach Championship of Chile (2007), Santiago CHI, rd 7, Feb-10
Bird Opening: General (A02)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 158 more games of L Rojas Keim
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have photographs. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-20-20  andrewjsacks: Great idea for the pun. Well done!
Oct-20-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Neglected the “0-1” and therefore thought that White would win after 27.Bd6. Black might have gotten lucky, but good defensive effort anyway.

The final error consisted of 63.Bg7. Kg2 had to be played, but the position remains rough for White; maybe Black can engineer a Zugzwang.

Oct-20-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: An interesting game all the way through. White lost it right at the end, and his ham-fisted clunker 63.Bg7?? reminded me of the story of that wily old Scot John Napier, who invented logarithms.

<Napier used his black cock to catch a thief. Napier told his servants to go into a darkened room and pet the cock, which had been coloured black by covering it with soot, claiming that the cock would crow if they were the one who stole his property. When the servants emerged, Napier inspected their hands to find the servant who was too afraid to touch the cock.>

Oct-20-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <offramp> Your mind works in strange ways.
Oct-20-20  Cheapo by the Dozen: So White had the advantage in space, which Black got rid of at the cost of giving up his advantage in pawn structure. Then, although the engine saw the game as a draw, Black had the better practical chances due to good/bad bishop issues. And eventually White messed up.
Oct-20-20  Cheapo by the Dozen: Or should one not talk of good/bad bishops when the issue is solely about the attackability of pawns, rather than open lines?
Oct-20-20  Brenin: Interesting story from <offramp> about the ingenious Napier, but not what first came to mind when I saw 63 Bg7.
Oct-20-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <Brenin: Interesting story from <offramp> about the ingenious Napier, but not what first came to mind when I saw 63 Bg7.>

No, but I am certain is was the very first thought of poor Rabindranath Mesias Rojas.

BTW, that's an odd sort of name: half Bengali and half Spanish. You don't see many of <them>.

Oct-20-20  Messiah: Terrible pun!
Oct-20-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Nice pun. Unfortunate blunder at the end of a long game.
Oct-20-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I like this position from today's game.


click for larger view

If you had walked past the table you might have thought that White was winning, but it's really dead level: Black just has to be a bit careful.

Ever since I read 60MG last week, and played through Kholmov vs Fischer, 1967, I have not been worried by white bishops on d6.
Knights yes, bishops no.

Oct-20-20  sfm: Upvote for pun!
The game was a great fight, and the next to last blunderer won.
Oct-20-20  sfm: <Napier inspected their hands to find the servant who was too afraid to touch the cock.> Clever, but still not conclusive. I have seen movie-clips with people who appeared to be afraid to touch black cocks. But of course, maybe they too were not that innocent.
Oct-20-20  Ironmanth: Good game; thanks chessgames! Y'all stay safe out there; wear a mask, and save a life.
Oct-20-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <Napier inspected their hands to find the servant who was too afraid to touch the cock.>

I've heard the same story attributed to a donkey with a tail covered with soot.

Oct-20-20  Diana Fernanda: What relationship is there between Sir John Napier and the player with the white pieces, only one; Napier was losing his mind and Mr. Rojas lost the game.
Oct-20-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <Diana Fernanda: What relationship is there between Sir John Napier and the player with the white pieces...>

Logs.

Oct-20-20  morfishine: There's only one Napier that matters, and he lost his brilliancy to Lasker: Lasker vs W Napier, 1904

A pity

Oct-20-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: F D Rosebault vs H Rosenfeld, 1909 Just saying loike.
Oct-20-20  Brenin: <Diana Fernanda>: I don't think John Napier was ever knighted (though his father was), or that he ever lost his mind. He was a religious fanatic, which was quite common in those days, and he had a few odd habits involving spiders and cocks, but I don't think he was insane.
Oct-20-20  Axel1940: Seemed more like 100 Years War than War of the Roses.
Oct-20-20  areknames: < F D Rosebault vs H Rosenfeld, 1909 Just saying loike> Well, <MissScarlett>, your generic <War of the Roses> has got nothing on this game's <The War of the Rojases>. You deserve a B+ for effort but please try harder. Loike.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC