Alan Shaw vs Eugene Perelshteyn (1996)

Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players ·

Kibitzing

Alan Shaw vs Eugene Perelshteyn
56th New England Open (1996), Lowell, MA USA, rd 6, Sep-02
King's Indian Defense: Saemisch Variation. Normal Defense (E81) · 0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening	find similar games	467 more games of E Perelshteyn
	PGN: download \| view \| print	Help: general \| java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you find a mistake in the database, use the correction form. There is a link at the bottom that reads "Spot an error? Please suggest your correction..." Avoid posting corrections in the kibitzing area.

For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 · Later Kibitzing>
Mar-10-14		keypusher: <Moszkowski012273: I'm not accomplishing anything> Not true. You've convinced me that however much Shaw <talked down to you>, he didn't talk you down far enough. Also, congrats on managing to post on a game that Shaw actually lost. Reading "White played terribly" about games that White won in 20 moves or so was getting disconcerting. So this is you, perfidious? I was wondering why you played 43.b3-b4. Seems like you could have held the draw if you had just sat tight.

Mar-10-14		perfidious: <keypusher> Don't remember, really, though you're most likely right that holding tight would have kept the draw.

Mar-11-14		Moszkowski012273: Maybe you guys are okay with being ridiculed on here but I am not. If acting like I'm three draws attention to someone who feels like they can, then I will continue to sleep well at night. YES- I went about this the wrong way. BUT- this gentleman will probably now think twice about belittling complete strangers. Admin will tell you the same.

Mar-11-14		perfidious: <Moszkowski012273: Maybe you guys are okay with being ridiculed on here but I am not....> You got called out for repeated unconstructive posts, so now your precious ego is bruised. <....If acting like I'm three draws attention to someone who feels like they can, then I will continue to sleep well at night....> You need to grow up, just a little. <....YES- I went about this the wrong way.....> Most certainly in an immature fashion. <....BUT- this gentleman will probably now think twice about belittling complete strangers....> You want to exorcise private demons, find another spot. <....Admin will tell you the same.> You made it your personal mission to trash games played by me as retribution for being called out--took a lot of cheek to invoke the powers that be when your childish attempts got slapped down, and rightly so.

Mar-11-14		Moszkowski012273: My ego's just fine. You're kinda cute when you're angry.

Mar-11-14		Petrosianic: <You're kinda cute when you're angry.> Oh, so THAT's what this is about. He's flirting with you, perfidious.

Mar-11-14		Petrosianic: <Hal Terrie commented that he had never seen such a grouping of the four bishops as occurred twice in this game, after White's 31st and 35th moves.> Neither have I. But it does vaguely remind me of a game, the players of which completely elude me at the moment. But it's in Horowitz's Golden Treasury of Chess, and features a mate all four of black's minors lined up against the King. It's also vaguely reminiscent of the odd formation of White Pawns after Move 23 in this game: Pachman vs Fischer, 1959

Mar-11-14		Moszkowski012273: Yeah maybe one day I'll even get to meet him in person. A boy can dream.

Mar-11-14		perfidious: <Petrosianic> Pachman-Fischer was always good for a laugh, unless one were Black.

Mar-13-14		Domdaniel: <perf> As you've probably realized, <Moszkow...> isn't worth the trouble of a constructive response. Just another idiot, really. Maybe one day a moderately intelligent troll will turn up, but it hasn't happened yet.

Mar-13-14		offramp: After 16.Rxd2 white looks like he has a won position.

Mar-16-14		OhioChessFan: Has it been long enough? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hATj...

Mar-17-14		FSR: <perfidious: After this game, the strong New Hampshire player Hal Terrie commented that he had never seen such a grouping of the four bishops as occurred twice in this game, after White's 31st and 35th moves. Neither had I, actually.> But I know you've seen similar configurations of knights. H Clemenz vs Eisenschmidt, 1890

Mar-17-14		Moszkowski012273: Guess someone doesn't like the pointless fighting on this page.

Mar-18-14		perfidious: <Moz: Guess someone doesn't like my pointless posts on this page, or elsewhere.> FYP

Mar-18-14		perfidious: <FSR> Never saw that clever grouping with the four knights till now.

Mar-18-14		Moszkowski012273: Are you both really that starved for attention that you feel the need to continue pushing buttons? I mean I do get it. Chess never paid off, constant feelings of unfulfillment requiring the need to post on chessgames thousands of times a year to feel validated, old age rapidly becoming a reality... I see your type all the time amongst the chess-players in this city I call home. It's sad.

Mar-18-14		Moszkowski012273: And what's "FYP"? Your acronyms are far too advanced for this little brain.

Mar-18-14		Moszkowski012273: Ahhhh! Thanks! Glad we have "post fixers" on here that does put my mind at ease.

Mar-18-14		FSR: <perfidious: <FSR> Never saw that clever grouping with the four knights till now.> I'm amazed. I think the first place I saw that game was in Chernev's <The Chess Companion>. It must also be in his <The 1000 Best Short Games of Chess> and surely some others. Next thing you'll tell me that you've never seen the "rainbow of bishops and knights game," Dodge vs J R Houghteling, 1904. See also V Sultanov vs S Kamaletdinov, 2011, which I submitted. I also submitted these two games back in July, neither of which seems to have made it into the database. Grr. [Event "Weymouth Open"] [Site "Weymouth, England"] [Date "1989.??.??"] [EventDate "1989.??.??"] [Round "?"] [Result "0-1"] [White "Clark"] [Black "Burgess, Graham"] [ECO "B03"] [WhiteElo "?"] [BlackElo "?"] 1.e4 Nf6 2.e5 Nd5 3.d4 d6 4.c4 Nb6 5.f4 dxe5 6.fxe5 c5 7.d5 e6 8.Nc3 exd5 9.cxd5 c4 10.d6 Nc6 11.Bf4 g5 12.Ne4 gxf4 13.Nf6+ Qxf6 14.exf6 Be6 15.Nf3 O-O-O 16.Be2 Bxd6 17.a3 Rhg8 18.Qc2 Bc5 19.Rd1 Rxd1+ 20.Kxd1 Nd5 21.Kc1 Ne3 22.Qe4 Rxg2 23.Re1 Na5 24.Nd2 c3 25.b4 cxd2+ 26.Kxd2 Nb3+ 27.Kc3 Bd4+ 28.Kd3 Bc4# [Event "blitz"] [Site "Internet Chess Club"] [Date "2007.09.10"] [EventDate "?"] [Round "?"] [Result "1-0"] [White "NN"] [Black "Max Wahlund"] [ECO "C07"] [WhiteElo "?"] [BlackElo "?"] 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 c5 4.exd5 Qxd5 5.Ngf3 cxd4 6.Bc4 Qd6 7.Nb3 Nf6 8.Nbxd4 Nc6 9.Nb5 Qxd1+ 10.Kxd1 Kd7 11.Ng5 Nd8 12.Ke2 a6 13.Rd1+ Ke7 14.Nc7 Rb8 15.Bf4 Nc6 16.Bd6+ Kd7 17.Nxf7 Rg8 18.Bxe6#

Mar-18-14		perfidious: <FSR> If that was in 1000 Best Short Games, I first saw it as a novice, but have not seen the book since probably my days in Class A. Dodge-Houghteling is one I well remember from <1000>.

Mar-19-14		RookFile: Reshevsky sends his regards: click for larger view Reshevsky vs M Solmundarson, 1984

Mar-19-14		FSR: <perfidious> I complained to Daniel and he added the games (Clark vs G Burgess, 1989 and NN vs Max Wahlund, 2007) to the database. He suggested that the problem may have been that I did not have 0-1 and 1-0 indicated at the end of the games.

Mar-19-14		perfidious: <FSR> Excellent. It is curious how the software will toss out games with the slightest errors of commission or omission.

Mar-19-14		FSR: <perfidious> Indeed. It would be nice if one were notified of the problem, or someone tried to fix it, instead of just having the game summarily rejected with no one paying any further attention to it.

search thread:
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 · Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
Nothing in violation of United States law.
No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
No trolling.
The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.