chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Eric Schiller
E Schiller 
photo courtesy of ericschiller.com  

Number of games in database: 779
Years covered: 1969 to 2012
Last FIDE rating: 1989
Highest rating achieved in database: 2370
Overall record: +355 -183 =173 (62.1%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database. 68 exhibition games, blitz/rapid, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Queen's Pawn Game (73) 
    A46 D05 A40 D02 A45
 Sicilian (46) 
    B31 B90 B45 B22 B70
 French Defense (36) 
    C15 C11 C10 C01
 King's Indian (35) 
    E60 E77 E76 E73 E61
 French Winawer (23) 
    C15
 Caro-Kann (17) 
    B12 B15 B13 B18 B17
With the Black pieces:
 Tarrasch Defense (58) 
    D34 D32
 Caro-Kann (57) 
    B18 B12 B17 B10 B13
 Robatsch (38) 
    B06
 Queen's Pawn Game (32) 
    D02 D00 A40 A41 D05
 Sicilian (28) 
    B43 B41 B42 B22 B27
 Queen's Gambit Declined (19) 
    D31 D30 D06
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   E Schiller vs M Arne, 1995 1-0
   R Vasquez Schroeder vs E Schiller, 2001 0-1
   E Schiller vs Busch, 1970 1-0
   Bafrali vs E Schiller, 1991 0-1
   Frank vs E Schiller, 1970 0-1
   E Schiller vs R Mapp, 1999 1-0
   M Labollita vs E Schiller, 2003 0-1
   E Schiller vs V Ossipov, 2005 1-0
   Reshevsky vs E Schiller, 1972 0-1
   E Schiller vs P Grieve, 2005 1-0

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   American Open (2003)
   Eileen Tranmer Memorial (1985)
   Koltanowski Memorial Open (2000)
   Max Wilkerson International (1998)
   Midwest Masters (1988)
   Continental Open (1993)
   Reykjavik Open (1986)
   Midwest Masters (1984)
   Lewisham International (1981)
   US Masters (1997)
   Saitek US Masters (1998)
   New York Open (1998)
   Groningen Open (1996)
   Gibraltar Masters (2006)
   Gibraltar Masters (2012)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   1994 Hawaii by gauer
   Annotated Games by LGTiger
   2000 American open by gauer
   1988 Pan-Am intercollegiate by gauer

GAMES ANNOTATED BY SCHILLER: [what is this?]
   Denker vs A R Shayne, 1945
   Kasparov vs Najdorf, 1982
   D van Geet vs Guyt, 1967
   J Perrier vs F Wellmuth, 1917
   Adorjan vs G Glatt, 1982
   >> 185 GAMES ANNOTATED BY SCHILLER

RECENT GAMES:
   🏆 US Game in 30 Championship
   S Sloan vs E Schiller (Oct-27-12) 0-1
   V Kuehnast vs E Schiller (Feb-01-12) 1-0
   E Schiller vs O Dolgova (Jan-31-12) 0-1
   K Lundback vs E Schiller (Jan-30-12) 0-1
   E Schiller vs W Leimeister (Jan-29-12) 0-1

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Eric Schiller
Search Google for Eric Schiller

ERIC SCHILLER
(born Mar-20-1955, died Nov-03-2018, 63 years old) United States of America

[what is this?]

Eric Andrew Schiller was born in New York. He has served as an international organizer for FIDE, and also an international arbiter, most notably for the Kasparov - Kramnik Classical World Championship Match (2000). Mr. Schiller also captained several Pan-American Intercollegiate teams, as well as the World Youth Championship in Chicago.

Over-the-board accomplishments include obtaining the FIDE Master and USCF Life Master titles. He won the 1974 Illinois State Championship, and the 1995 Calchess State Championship. Schiller was a prolific and popular author of a wide range of chess books.

US Chess Federation's obituary notice: https://new.uschess.org/news/eric-s...

Wikipedia article: Eric Schiller

Last updated: 2021-01-10 05:52:25

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 32; games 1-25 of 779  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. E Schiller vs H Pack 1-031969Port Washington (skittles)C20 King's Pawn Game
2. R Gruchacz vs E Schiller ½-½371970New York Junior ChampionshipB20 Sicilian
3. E Schiller vs Heeley 1-0191970Eastern High School ChampionshipB00 Uncommon King's Pawn Opening
4. E Schiller vs Flamberg 1-0281970Eastern High School ChampionshipC30 King's Gambit Declined
5. E Schiller vs J Tompkins 1-0231970New York City ReserveC57 Two Knights
6. Chaiken vs E Schiller 0-1191970New YorkC23 Bishop's Opening
7. Frank vs E Schiller 0-171970New YorkC43 Petrov, Modern Attack
8. Roman vs E Schiller 0-1111970New YorkC50 Giuoco Piano
9. E Schiller vs Busch 1-0111970New YorkC57 Two Knights
10. E Schiller vs Freedman 1-0511970SmithtownD15 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
11. Lombardy vs E Schiller ½-½361971SimulA52 Budapest Gambit
12. E Schiller vs J Jacobs 1-0291971Eastern H.S. ChampionshipA07 King's Indian Attack
13. E Schiller vs V Klemm 1-0151971Manhattan Chess Club ChampionshipB99 Sicilian, Najdorf, 7...Be7 Main line
14. E Schiller vs W Bornack 1-0251971Manhattan Chess Club ChampionshipB98 Sicilian, Najdorf
15. Solomon vs E Schiller 0-1331971Eastern High School ChampionshipB41 Sicilian, Kan
16. E Schiller vs A Draifinger 1-0311971Eastern High School ChampionshipA07 King's Indian Attack
17. E Schiller vs J Jacobs 0-1261971Continental JuniorA02 Bird's Opening
18. Gheorghiu vs E Schiller 1-0421971SimulA31 English, Symmetrical, Benoni Formation
19. Reshevsky vs E Schiller 0-1421972Simul, Manhattan Chess ClubD25 Queen's Gambit Accepted
20. E Schiller vs Zacher 1-0211973Chicago ChampionshipA80 Dutch
21. E Schiller vs D Reents 1-0391973Illinois Junior ChampionshipD40 Queen's Gambit Declined, Semi-Tarrasch
22. Hill vs E Schiller 0-1311974IllinoisE07 Catalan, Closed
23. T Knight vs E Schiller 0-1241974IllinoisE23 Nimzo-Indian, Spielmann
24. E Schiller vs Hastings 1-0221975University of ChicagoD36 Queen's Gambit Declined, Exchange, Positional line, 6.Qc2
25. E Schiller vs Polikoff 1-0301975IllinoisD86 Grunfeld, Exchange
 page 1 of 32; games 1-25 of 779  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Schiller wins | Schiller loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 54 OF 112 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-09-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  IMlday: I'm a bit jealous of -2000 players because they can play almost any opening at all. I had Latvian Counter-Gambits and Budapest Defences in my repertoire before cracking the expert rating. Alas I had to then lay aside dubious gambits like Breyer or Mora, but learning tactics and combinations were necessary to get beyond the 2000 barrier.
Jun-09-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: Here are some openings I'd avoid if under 2000:
Scheveningen Sicilian
Najdorf Sicilian
Semi-Slav Defense
King's Indian Defense
Gruenfeld Defense
Queen's Gambit Accepted
Modern Defense
Winawer French
Main Line English Opening

These openings require good strategic decisions right after the opening moves are played. It is not easy to know what to do next. Bad bishops are in particular hard to deal with.

The Dragon, Accelerated Dragon, Lakser-Pelikan-Sveshnikov and Kan/Paulsen are all strategically easier Sicilians, even if the tactics can get complex. The Caro-Kann, Tarrasch Defense, Nimzoindian/Queen's Indian are straightforward strategically and much easier to play.

The main thing to remember, is that if you aren't a Kasparov or Fischer, what the heck are you doing trying to play their custom repertoires!

As a teacher/trainer, I move my students through a progression of openings. We start with those played by Morphy, and work our way through the historical world champions. Earlier champions favored simpler openings and those are better models for an aspiring chessplayer. I used these models in "World Champion Openings".

There probably will be some comments on this, so I'll hold off on more explanation for the moment.

Jun-09-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Wish I'd known that earlier, I'm already hooked on Sicilian Schev. & Naj. :-(
Jun-09-06  Chopin: <Wannabe>

<Wish I'd known that earlier, I'm already hooked on Sicilian Schev. & Naj. :-(>

It's still not too late to quit chess :)

Jun-09-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <Chopin> I'm picking up curling... Yeah, doing curling in So. Cal. that'd be a hoot...
Jun-09-06  Chopin: <Wannabe> <I'm picking up curling>

Did you know that curling is also called "Chess on ice"?

Jun-09-06  jackmandoo: My main opening is bringing the king's bishop out and then my queen. I'm trying the 4 move checkmate every time if you play me. This is why I hate to be black. A lot of people say that I play like Fischer because I try and go for the throat. Im not really sure about that but its hard to argue when I win over half of my games on yahoo.
Jun-09-06  lasher09: <jackmandoo> yahoo is packed with weak players man.
Jun-09-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: <lasher> Nothing wrong with playing against weak players, chess is supposed to be fun! I play online against mostly low rated players at www.chess.ac, because I'm constantly researching mistakes amateurs make so I can write helpful books.
Jun-09-06  Chopin: <Eric Schiller> My new favorite opening is the Evan's gambit. What's your take on it?
Jun-09-06  ganstaman: <jackmandoo> But, if I may, playing for the 4 move checkmate (Scholar's Mate, right?), is bad for you.

1)If it does work and you win in 4 moves, you haven't learned anything.

2)If it doesn't work, you have your queen where your king's knight should be. This will make development of that knight more difficult, making it take longer to castle also. This is bad if you are trying to learn more about good development.

3)Alternatively, if it doesn't work and your queen isn't on f3, then you spent many moves running her around the board. You will be behind in development, which again will make the game more difficult on you.

You should realize that you won't be able to pull of a quick mate against good competition, so you should instead play good, logical, normal developing moves. Look at Morphy's games -- he doesn't crush his competition by bringing his queen out right away and going for simple mates. Instead, he develops all his pieces to good squares, and when his opponent doesn't follow suit, he goes in for the kill (it's like an unfair fight -- Morphy uses more pieces!).

Jun-09-06  ganstaman: I see L. Day mentioned the Smith-Mora Gambit. I think it's a great gambit for getting a good feel for openings (I'm by no means more than an amateur myself, so correct me if I'm wrong). White gets good, easy development of all his pieces and open lines to use them. It's easy to see where each piece should go and what it should be doing there. Whether it's actually good enough for masters, I don't know. But I think it's the best way to play against the Sicilian when you are less than a master (or is it expert? I don't know the exact distinction).
Jun-09-06  lasher09: <jackmandoo> When faced with a stronger opponent, you'll realize how much time you've wasted on 4 move checkmate.
Jun-09-06  Chopin: <Lasher-09> & <ganstaman> You do realize that <Jackmandoo> is joking.
Jun-09-06  ganstaman: Well then, that will teach me to not read everything before I reply.

But I will leave my comments for any beginner who does try 4 move checkmates, and for my dignity! of which I have none left....

Jun-09-06  jackmandoo: <ganstaman> sorry for making you write that big response. I was just kidding as <Chopin> said. Maybe I could make things up to you. *CYBERHUG*
Jun-09-06  lasher09: <Chopin: <Lasher-09> & <ganstaman> You do realize that <Jackmandoo> is joking.>

oh... ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha... =>

Jun-10-06  lasher09: <Eric Schiller> Thanks for your reply. that helped a lot. I'm taking note. I hope these geniuses would too. =>

And another thing, if I may, I have a 4 year old niece who is very interested in chess. She wants to play with me everyday and move pieces. What I'm doing is when we play I tell her to move this and this and eat this and that throughout the whole game, only playing the Italian where she can develop her pieces. Most of the time I let her win, where she goes around the house and tell everyone, and sometimes I beat her so she can feel some challenge. We do it over and over again (not necessarily the same game). My objective is to train her mind through repitition until she can recognize patterns and moves on her own. It is showing good results. Of course I'm not expecting much at her age but she just loves the game so much that I wanna I take advantage of her interest of it now.

Yesterday, at the third game, I left her to her moves alone without me dictating and she was able to. I exchanged pieces and pawns and she was able to identify which ones can take back. There were also times when she recognized that she can move her knight on a certain square (h5) where it won't be attacked by pawns.

This is my first time to teach chess to a 4 year old. What can you suggest?

Jun-10-06  Rocafella: Lmao, <jackmandoo>, well played, you had em left right and centre
Jun-10-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: <Dr Schiller> last year I made a decision to play strictly e4 as White, e5 to White's e4, d5 to White's d4 and respond e6, d5 to flank openings mainly to concentrate more on the middle game and end game improvement.. do you think this is a good strategy.. I didn't bother with fall back openings or a second repetoire as I mainly played on the internet and in the first 20 games I played my rating improved from the initial 1200 to 1984 before plummeting due to a period when I became totally sick of chess.. however I am interested to know if you would actually recommend this type of opening repetoire to a person in the 1500 - 1900 rating level
Jun-10-06  Chopin: <Dr. Schiller>

I never knew that Mr. Schiller has a Ph.D. in Linguistics; very impressive.

Jun-10-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: <I never knew that Mr. Schiller has a Ph.D. in Linguistics; very impressive.> from the pterodactyl classifications I thought it must be paleantology
Jun-10-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: <lasher> At that age it is better to play with no pawn or knights, setting up the pieces in some reasonable way. The pawn moves and knight moves tend to be very confusing to all beginners, but with young kids it is a big problem.
Jun-10-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: <Open> Most of my students play those openings, and it is my basic recommended repertoire, so I approve. But the notion that results are keyed to openings is wrong. Any decent opening will do if you know how to play, and none will work if you don't.
Jun-10-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: <open, Chopin> Linguistics involves the same sort of problem-solving that chess does, so it is a natural fit. Unfortunately, I was affirmative-actioned (I'm in favor of AA, but what was done to me was simply obscene, especially by the University of Michigan) out of academia, so haven't done much in the last decade, though I am still interested. Now I mostly use linguistics to teach kids English grammar and writing, working with home-schoolers in the Bay Area. Some excerpts of my material are at my website www.ericschiller.com.
Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 112)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 54 OF 112 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC