chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

OhioChessFan
Member since Apr-09-05 · Last seen Nov-09-25
______________ Moves Prediction Contest

<Main Focus>: Predicting how many moves in a game for each pairing.

Chessgames.com tournament page:
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...

Official site: http://

Live games:
http://www.nrk.no/sport/sjakk/

Alternative live games: http://worldchess.com/broadcasts/eu...

***Hall of Fame***
chessmoron chessforum

<Format>:

[player]-[player] [result] [# of MOVES]

==4 Different Scoring Methods==

Standard Moves Ranker (1st place-Over[3pts], 1st place-Under [7pts], Exact [10pts])

Bonus Ranker (3rd place-Over[1pts],2nd place-Over[2pts],3rd place-Under [5pts], 2nd place-Under [6pts]

Standard Moves/Bonus Ranker [Add all to together]

1st place Ranker [how many 1st place you have in Standard Moves Ranker]

For example:

<Note: Participants 3, 4, and 5 are predicated on nobody scoring an exact as Participant 2 did. If someone hits an exact, the closest score under and over will score the points for second place.>

Actual Game: [player]-[player] 0-1 45

Participant 1: [player]-[player] 1/2 45
Participant 2: [player]-[player] 0-1 45
Participant 3: [player]-[player] 0-1 44
Participant 4: [player]-[player] 0-1 43
Participant 5: [player]-[player] 0-1 46

Participant 1: No points even though 45 is correct. Results must be correct. If Result is wrong and moves # is correct...you get no points whatsoever

Participant 2: 10 pts rewarded for correct Result/moves #

Participant 3: 7 pts rewarded for closest under (1st-Under) to 45 moves

Participant 4: 6 pts rewarded for the 2nd closest under (2nd-Under) to 45 moves.

Participant 5: 3 pts rewarded closest OVER(1st-OVER) to 45 moves.

Again, the description of Participant 3, 4, and 5 are based on there being no exact prediction as made by Participant 2.

<IF> there is an exact or an under closest, the highest scoring over participant will be 2nd over. The second closest over will be 3rd over. The <ONLY> time there will be a first over is if there is no exact or under winner.

Things To Look At:
1. Game Collection: 1975 World Junior chess championship
2. Ongoing edits Vladimir Ostrogsky
3. Bio Adolf Zytogorski
4. Complete the Olympiad
5. Bio Lorenz Maximilian Drabke

7. Baden-Baden (1870)

11. Karl Mayet
12. Smbat Lputian

Pi Day
rreusser/computing-with-the-bailey-borwein-plouffe-formula">https://observablehq.com/(at)rreusser/...

Pun Index Game Collection: Game of the Day & Puzzle of the Day Collections

>> Click here to see OhioChessFan's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member
   Current net-worth: 792 chessbucks
[what is this?]

   OhioChessFan has kibitzed 49344 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Nov-09-25 Chessgames - Music
 
OhioChessFan: 19 minutes of music so beautiful it will bring you to tears. Bach-Brandenberg Concerto 5 https://youtu.be/D1xaagpUGs4?si=1sQ...
 
   Nov-09-25 Fusilli chessforum
 
OhioChessFan: I found the source of a previous puzzle: https://youtu.be/3XkA2ZoVFQo?si=fGG...
 
   Nov-08-25 B Hague vs Plaskett, 2004 (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: Morra, Hague Convention, I like it.
 
   Nov-07-25 Chessgames - Politics (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: <BREAKING: British veteran breaks down live on TV over state of the country: "Rows and rows of white tombs for what? A country of today? No, I'm sorry. The sacrifice wasn't worth the result. I fought for freedom, and it's darn-sight worse now than when I fought."> Poor ...
 
   Nov-07-25 C Wells vs J Rush, 1963
 
OhioChessFan: "Fly-By Knight"
 
   Nov-07-25 K Hanache vs P Crocker, 2024
 
OhioChessFan: "Not Two Knights, I Have a Hanache"
 
   Nov-05-25 Niemann vs L Lodici, 2025 (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: White has three Pawns for a poorly placed Knight. I'd rather have the Knight, but as of move 29, I don't see any particular plans for
 
   Nov-04-25 Chessgames - Sports (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: Mike Royko was fantastic. Slats Grobnik was guaranteed to make me laugh myself silly.
 
   Nov-04-25 D Gukesh vs K Nogerbek, 2025
 
OhioChessFan: Those crazy chess players, playing down to bare Kings....
 
   Nov-04-25 B Men vs Ftacnik, 1993
 
OhioChessFan: "Mad Men"
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Moves Prediction Contest

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 227 OF 849 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-17-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: you probably criticized the Owen Defence :)
Apr-17-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: well we were a bit paranoid about giving Rybka play on our Q side (I think it missed a trick by not playing a4 sooner and trying to rip open the Q side), and we played safe moves defending first before trying a k side thrust, we definitely saw the draw before Rybka and understandably so as there were no tablebases
Apr-18-11  Travis Bickle: Hey Elvis this guy could sing better than you! ; P

http://youtu.be/TUe7dMi2uLA

Apr-21-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Travis, I kindly suggest you take that back:
http://www.elvispresleynews.com/ima...
Apr-21-11  Travis Bickle: Never "The King," HAHAHA!!!
Apr-23-11  cormier: Matthew 8:7 New American Standard Bible (© 1995)
Jesus said to him, "I will come and heal him."
Apr-27-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: Hi.

Serious question - if you peruse my forum, you will see that I have already asked several other users to do this.

Could you give me your final observations on the "Pogonina-vs-The World" match? Honest Injun, tell me what you really think. <You Rang>, <Chancho> and several others have already done this for me.

Some of the observations were quite interesting!

Apr-27-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Ohio>

Regarding your historical theory on <ghoul> vs. <Kulla Tierchen>, or perhaps more appropriately "Spy vs. Spy," I came across this by accident today while on the Botvinnik page:

Mikhail Botvinnik

<Dec-14-02 <Ghoul:> Alekhine was not a very good person. You praise him and denounce Botvinnik. Alekhine was an opportunist, he had no honor or authenticity. Botvinnik believed in Stalin and always prepared for his matches, he did not show up drunk. . Botvinnik believed he was helping his society by being world champion. He could have defected but he was not greedy like Alekhine. Alekhine was a Nazi collaborator. Botvinnik had honor and authenticity.

Dec-14-02 <Kulla Tierchen:> Authenticity!! Have you been reading the works of the Nazi collaborator Heidegger perhaps?>

This "Two for the price of one man" was awfully clever, in addition to being funny. Heidegger's "Being and Time" is a 76,000 page inquiry into what, exactly, constitutes "authentic being." In addition, Heidegger was accused, with some justification, of Nazi collaboration, same as Alekhine.

I was forced to read "Being and Time" in university at the point of a gun.

More or less.

I wish <ghoul/kulla> would return. Or that I had gotten them as University Professors.

Apr-28-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <Botvinnik believed in Stalin and always prepared for his matches>

I just noticed how hilarious that line is.

Apr-28-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I just read the Wiki entry on Being and Time and fell asleep about halfway through. There's much discussion in the New Testament about Gnosticism, and a lot of the commentary therein dismisses such writings as babble.
Apr-28-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <AJ> I have written a concise summary of the Pogo game. I had posted it for a few minutes and then had second thoughts because if I am to be honest, I must have some blunt criticisms for some of the team. I am considering my options right now. For now, I will leave this thought: It was a thorougly unenjoyable game.
Apr-28-11  hms123: <OCF> Are you willing to send the summary to me? If not, I understand. I suspect we share a lot of the same concerns. thanks.
Apr-28-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I must clarify much of the kibitzing in the Pogo game was great fun. Among other things, I discovered a creative side with the song parodies I didn't know I had. I morphed from annoyance with <chrisowen> to bemused tolerance to great anticipation of his next post. There were many other laughs along the way. But the game itself was a real buzzkill.
Apr-28-11  hms123: <OCF> The kibitzing did have its moments. Your parodies were a highlight.
Apr-28-11  hms123: <OCF> I think you nailed it. My version would have named names, but I think your way is better. thanks.
Apr-28-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Ohio> I think you did well to get half way through the wiki version before snoozing, given that no firearms were involved.

I read a lot of the posts on the <P-game> and I still found the foe and her spy to be the most thoroughly unenjoyable people involved, by far.

I think it was a failed experiment to have less than three days per move, and if CG.com doesn't return to the old time control, the "challenge games" will die out, and will no longer serve to garner outside interest in our website.

Only thing I noticed that maybe wasn't talked about already was the participation of two prominent youtube chess video analysts, both of whom became very, very crabby and then disappeared. I know both of them quite well from conversations on youtube over the last three years.

I kind of felt like apologizing for the way the game turned out, if only to defend CG.com in general.

But I wasn't involved except as a lurking "post reader" and sporadic insulter of the antagonist, who in my view was- and remains- an outright liar.

It's an outrage to legitimate Grandmasters- women who actually obtained the title, such as <GM Szusza Polgar> (first woman grandmaster in history), <GM Kosteniuk>, and especially <GM Judit Polgar>, that the antagonist insisted on billing herself as a Grandmaster all over our website and also on her own webpage.

She is not a Grandmaster.

Apr-28-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <I read a lot of the posts on the <P-game> and I still found the foe and her spy to be the most thoroughly unenjoyable people involved, by far.>

The best I can say for <PZ> is that he might have been acting from a desire to defend his wife's honor, which was admittedly challenged.

Apr-28-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: That hadn't even occurred to me= the "chivalry" angle.

<PZ: Knight Errant>

I've no doubt that he loves his wife.

Apr-29-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: <OCF> Thanks for the feedback on the Pogonina game. <You Rang>, <chancho>, and a few others have sent me e-mails and/or posted comments in my forum.

Personally - although I think a few of the (song) parodies were at my expense (more or less) - I still found them funny.

Apr-29-11  hms123: <OCF> My very good friend, Brad Bates, is the AD at Miami. I was on his doctoral committee. He is a great guy so if you ever go to a game look him up.
Apr-29-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: If I run into him, I'll tell him you said to collect the $500 he owes you.
Apr-29-11  hms123: <OCF> Actually, tell him that he owes me a cheeseburger and fries (and a beer)at McCabe's Pub in Nashville. You have more chance of collecting.
Apr-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <you're an idiot if you trust Ask Jeeves>

heh...

Apr-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I was disappointed I didn't provoke a long and odd argument.
Apr-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Yes that would surely have been an optimal result.

There must be some die-hard "Jeeves" fans out there somewhere.

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 849)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 227 OF 849 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Participating Grandmasters are Not Allowed Here!

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC