User Profile: OhioChessFan

Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players ·

Kibitzing

OhioChessFan
Member since Apr-09-05 · Last seen Jan-23-26

______________ Moves Prediction Contest
<Main Focus>: Predicting how many moves in a game for each pairing.
Chessgames.com tournament page:
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...
Official site: http://
Live games:
http://www.nrk.no/sport/sjakk/
Alternative live games: http://worldchess.com/broadcasts/eu...
***Hall of Fame***
chessmoron chessforum
<Format>:
[player]-[player] [result] [# of MOVES]
==4 Different Scoring Methods==
Standard Moves Ranker (1st place-Over[3pts], 1st place-Under [7pts], Exact [10pts])
Bonus Ranker (3rd place-Over[1pts],2nd place-Over[2pts],3rd place-Under [5pts], 2nd place-Under [6pts]
Standard Moves/Bonus Ranker [Add all to together]
1st place Ranker [how many 1st place you have in Standard Moves Ranker]
For example:
<Note: Participants 3, 4, and 5 are predicated on nobody scoring an exact as Participant 2 did. If someone hits an exact, the closest score under and over will score the points for second place.>
Actual Game: [player]-[player] 0-1 45
Participant 1: [player]-[player] 1/2 45
Participant 2: [player]-[player] 0-1 45
Participant 3: [player]-[player] 0-1 44
Participant 4: [player]-[player] 0-1 43
Participant 5: [player]-[player] 0-1 46
Participant 1: No points even though 45 is correct. Results must be correct. If Result is wrong and moves # is correct...you get no points whatsoever
Participant 2: 10 pts rewarded for correct Result/moves #
Participant 3: 7 pts rewarded for closest under (1st-Under) to 45 moves
Participant 4: 6 pts rewarded for the 2nd closest under (2nd-Under) to 45 moves.
Participant 5: 3 pts rewarded closest OVER(1st-OVER) to 45 moves.
Again, the description of Participant 3, 4, and 5 are based on there being no exact prediction as made by Participant 2.
<IF> there is an exact or an under closest, the highest scoring over participant will be 2nd over. The second closest over will be 3rd over. The <ONLY> time there will be a first over is if there is no exact or under winner.
Things To Look At:
1. Game Collection: 1975 World Junior chess championship
2. Ongoing edits Vladimir Ostrogsky
3. Bio Adolf Zytogorski
4. Complete the Olympiad
5. Bio Lorenz Maximilian Drabke
7. Baden-Baden (1870)
11. Karl Mayet
12. Smbat Lputian
Pi Day
rreusser/computing-with-the-bailey-borwein-plouffe-formula">https://observablehq.com/rreusser/...

Pun Index Game Collection: Game of the Day & Puzzle of the Day Collections

>> Click here to see OhioChessFan's game collections.

   Current net-worth: 792 chessbucks
[what is this?]

   OhioChessFan has kibitzed 49596 times to chessgames [more...]

   Jan-22-26 Chessgames - Politics

OhioChessFan: The View, MSNOW, CNN all figured out the truth of Renee Good . Rogoff libs predictably hold firm. https://youtu.be/B2n-sdw6_1M?si=srv...

   Jan-21-26 Niemann vs Abdusattorov, 2026

OhioChessFan: A draw in 30 at 100-1 seems reasonable.

   Jan-20-26 Kibitzer's Café

OhioChessFan: Turn this thing up to 11. Cream-Politician https://youtu.be/vlvA0sMvnqo?si=_b1...

   Jan-20-26 C Aravindh vs Niemann, 2026

OhioChessFan: Thanks for the live game.

   Jan-20-26 Memorable Quotes chessforum

OhioChessFan: <troller> on a live game: <Aravindh seems in prep after 15.g4 but engine is not impressed. Weird position though, looks to me both players are worse.> C Aravindh vs Niemann, 2026

   Jan-19-26 D Ghizdavu vs I Roebuck, 1966

OhioChessFan: "Sears Roebuck"

   Jan-18-26 E Moskow vs A Lesiege, 1993

OhioChessFan: "Moskow Under Lesiege"

   Jan-18-26 A Erigaisi vs Praggnanandhaa, 2026

OhioChessFan: I had no idea on the pun until I googled it.

   Jan-15-26 Julien Song

OhioChessFan: 90 minute games today and tomorrow. Next day the rapids. Fourth day the blitz. Am I the only one with no audio on the chess.com stream?

   Jan-15-26 Chessgames - Music

OhioChessFan: Do yourself a favor and spend three minutes listening to this nice flute driven piece. Nestor Torres-Cute https://youtu.be/Eor1meJSZPs?si=duk...

indicates a reply to the comment.

Moves Prediction Contest

< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 44 OF 849 · Later Kibitzing>
Dec-02-08		jessicafischerqueen: <Deffi> heh NICE ONE... No "moves" on the screen though. I forgot to ask you when I was running the <coolest man of the 20th century> contest-- How good is your husband at <owning firearms and keeping his hos in line>? We should have put him in the nominations. <Dom> got in the nominations and I don't think he even owns any firearms. And he finished <second> in the voting!!!

Dec-02-08		Open Defence: I own the firearms around the house

Dec-02-08		OhioChessFan: <travis> Galatians 4:4-5 But when the time had fully come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under law, to redeem those under law, that we might receive the full rights of sons. "Born under law" means he was accountable to the law in effect at that time, the law of Moses. While he preached a new law, the old law was still in effect until his death. Just as you might write your will and all its provisions, and we could read it, it still would not be in effect until your death. It's hard for me to picture Jesus participating in a stoning but I can't affirm he would not have.

Dec-02-08		OhioChessFan: Odie, I think it was more a change in emphasis from the physical to the spiritual. Jesus had some chilling words about the eventual punishment of the disobedient.

Dec-02-08		OhioChessFan: Artar, whatever truth is to be found. Life is a search for truth.

Dec-02-08		Open Defence: <Ohio> compassion cannot be in defiance of the law, rather it is an extension of upholding it in both letter and spirit

Dec-04-08		OhioChessFan: I'm not sure there's a gentle spirit whereby you can stone someone. My general take on my religious beliefs is I can easily defend them on intellectual grounds. I don't feel that affirming Christianity means ipso facto one has set their brain aside.

Dec-04-08		Open Defence: <I'm not sure there's a gentle spirit whereby you can stone someone.> no, of course not

Dec-16-08		ihendley: <26...g6 27.Qe1 Qc7 28.Nb3 d5 29.Re2 e5 30.Red2 dxe4 31.fxe4 Re6 32.Ka1 Rc6 33. Qf2 Bc8> click for larger view Rybka 3 d=20 1. (0.36) Nc5 Kg7 b4 a5 Rd8 Be6 R1d2 2. (0.12) Rf1 Kg7 Nc5 Qe7 b4 Be6 Nxe6+

Dec-16-08		ihendley: Rybka 3 d=21 1. (0.37) Nc5 Kg7 b4 Rh8 Bb3 Qe7 Rf1 a5 a3 2. (0.12) Rf1 Kg7 Nc5 Qe7 b4 Be6 Nxe6+ Rxe6

Dec-16-08		OhioChessFan: Thanks ihendley

Dec-16-08		ihendley: No problem. Stopping at: 1 23 +0.35 Nc5 Kg7 b4 Rh8 Bb3 Qe7 Rf1 a5 a3 2 22 +0.01 Rf1 Kg7 Nc5 Qe7 b4 Be6 Nxe6+

Dec-17-08		WannaBe: I wish I can donate membership this year, things are pretty rough, may have to skip a year. =( See how next year(s) goes.

Dec-18-08		WannaBe: Bless you. You are a true gentleman, and a scholar. I don't care what <chessgames.com> says about you. :-)

Dec-24-08		technical draw: Hi, <OhioChessFan>, You Ok this holiday season? Hope all is well, have a happy one...TD

Dec-29-08		jessicafischerqueen: <OhioChessFan: <I DO APOLOGIZE Mr Jung. > MISTER Jung? This is going from bad to worse. > Er... any idea what that is all about? My first instinct is that these "Bondasimir" and "LT.Col Jung" people are actually just one person talking to his <sockpuppet> for comedic effect. Then I thought maybe they are in the <Korean army> and like to play chess. Anyways it's the most bizarre exchange I've ever read on that thread. Which is saying a lot. Happy New Year <King>

Dec-29-08		Trigonometrist: E Vladimirov vs V Vorotnikov, 1974

Dec-29-08		Trigonometrist: <Ohio> All threats of extinction of the English language have been removed by my correction of my bio... Very many thanks to you for pointing that out to me...

Dec-31-08		Trigonometrist: H Westerinen vs G Sigurjonsson, 1977 A Afifi vs Beliavsky, 1985 P N Wallis vs NN, 1923 P N Wallis vs NN, 1923 Y Shulman vs D Marciano, 1997 N Shoup vs Marshall, 1906 E Kengis vs R Djurhuus, 1991 W Knoop vs L Malandain, 1995 Y Shulman vs D Marciano, 1997 E Vladimirov vs V Vorotnikov, 1974 A Fritz vs J Mason, 1883 R Plunkett vs S Fink, 2003 (Pattern Please...)

Dec-31-08		OhioChessFan: <WannaBee> I was hoping to be nominated for the gentleman and scholar Caissar. <TD> I'm not real big on the whole Christmas thing, but I do enjoy the time off work and spending time with my family. <FQ> maybe the Koreans have absorbed the sarcastic spirit of Hawkeye. Anyway, no soldier would dare to call an officer "Mister" so I will go out on a limb and suggest that's not really a conversation betwixt military personnel.

Jan-08-09		WannaBe: Happy Boithday to the King! Long live the King! Hunk-a Hunk-a Burning Love!

Jan-16-09		chessmoron: 2009 Corus 'Moves' Prediction Contest: <Format>: [player]-[player] [result] [MOVE] ==4 Different Scoring Methods== Standard Moves Ranker (1st place-Over[3pts], 1st place-Under [7pts], Exact [10pts]) Bonus Ranker (3rd place-Over[1pts],2nd place-Over[2pts],3rd place-Under [5pts], 2nd place-Under [6pts] Standard Moves/Bonus Ranker [Add all to together] 1st place Ranker [how many 1st place you have in Standard Moves Ranker] For example: Actual Game: [player]-[player] 0-1 45 Participant 1: [player]-[player] 1/2 45 Participant 2: [player]-[player] 0-1 45 Participant 3: [player]-[player] 0-1 44 Participant 4: [player]-[player] 0-1 43 Participant 5: [player]-[player] 0-1 46 Participant 6: [player]-[player] 0-1 47 Participant 1: No points even though 45 is correct. Results must be correct. If Result is wrong and moves # is correct...you get no points whatsoever Participant 2: 10 pts rewarded for correct Result/moves # Participant 3: 7 pts rewarded for closest under (1st-Under) to 45 moves Participant 4: 6 pts rewarded for the 2nd closest under (2nd-Under) to 45 moves. Participant 5: 3 pts rewarded closest OVER(1st-OVER) to 45 moves. Participant 6: 2 pts rewarded 2nd closest OVER (2nd-OVER) to 45 moves.

Jan-16-09		chessmoron: <Robin01> Round 1-3 All 1-0 and All 40 moves per game <lostemperor> Stellwagen - Movsesian 1/2 43 Carlsen - Radjabov 1/2 42 Aronian - Wang Yue 1-0 45 Ivanchuk - Smeets 1-0 40 Karjakin - Morozevich 1/2 41 Van Wely - Dominguez 1-0 46 Kamsky - Adams 1/2 34 <lostemperor> Stellwagen – Movsesian 1/2 40 Carlsen – Radjabov 1-0 50 Aronian – Yue 1/2 29 Ivanchuk – Smeets 1-0 35 Karjakin – Morozevich 1/2 42 van Wely – Dominguez 1/2 33 Kamsky – Adams 1/2 27

Jan-16-09		jessicafischerqueen: Hi <Wilson>!! Why does <lostemperor> get to make two separate predictions for round one? I am royalty too. But I will only make one prediction: Stellwagen - Movsesian 1/2 one million Carlsen - Radjabov 1/2 zero Aronian - Wang Yue 1/2 one hundred Ivanchuk - Smeets 1/2 six hundred Karjakin - Morozevich 1/2 a thousand Van Wely - Dominguez 1-0 two million Kamsky - Adams 1/2 eight hundred

Jan-16-09		jessicafischerqueen: Err.. <Wilson> why don't you renew your forum? Seems a little ironic that you haven't renewed when you have bought around 3000 premium memberships for other people at this website. Do you want me to buy you a new preemy? Mrs. Premium Membership privileges

Jump to page # (enter # from 1 to 849)
search thread:
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 44 OF 849 · Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
Nothing in violation of United States law.
No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
No trolling.
The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Participating Grandmasters are Not Allowed Here!

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.