chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

Phony Benoni
Member since Feb-10-06 · Last seen Jun-11-22
Greetings, O Seeker After Knowledge! You have arrived in Dearborn, Michigan (whether you like it or not), and are reading words of wisdom from a player rated 2938--plus or minus 1000 points.

However, I've retired from serious play--not that I ever took playing chess all that seriously. You only have to look at my games to see that. These days I pursue the simple pleasures of finding games that are bizarre or just plain funny. I'd rather enjoy a game than analyze it.

For the record, my name is David Moody. This probably means nothing to you unless you're a longtime player from Michigan, though it's possible that if you attended any US Opens from 1975-1999 we might have crossed paths. Lucky you.

If you know me at all, you'll realize that most of my remarks are meant to be humorous. I do this deliberately, so that if my analysis stinks to High Heaven I can always say that I was just joking.

As you can undoubtedly tell from my sparkling wit, I'm a librarian in my spare time. Even worse, I'm a cataloger, which means I keep log books for cattle. Also, I'm not one of those extroverts who sit at the Reference Desk and help you with research. Instead, I spend all day staring at a computer screen updating and maintaining information in the library's catalog. The general public thinks Reference Librarians are dull. Reference Librarians think Catalogers are dull.

My greatest achievement in chess, other than tricking you into reading this, was probably mating with king, bishop and knight against king in a tournament game. I have to admit that this happened after an adjournment, and that I booked up like crazy before resuming. By the way, the fact I have had adjourned games shows you I've been around too long.

My funniest moment occurred when I finally got a chance to pull off a smothered mate in actual play. You know, 1.Nf7+ Kg8 2.Nh6+ Kh8 3.Qg8+ Rxg8 4.Nf7#. When I played the climactic queen check my opponent looked at the board in shocked disbelief and said, "But that's not mate! I can take the queen!"

Finally, I must confess that I once played a positional move, back around 1982. I'll try not to let that happen again.

>> Click here to see Phony Benoni's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   Phony Benoni has kibitzed 18634 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jun-11-22 M Blau vs Keres, 1959 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Not a good recommendation for the DERLD. Out of 59 moves, White makes only three in Black's half of the board. And two of those conist of 3.Bb5 and 6.Bxc6.
 
   Jun-11-22 chessgames.com chessforum (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Er, it's back. Karpov vs Timman, 1988
 
   Jun-10-22 Orlo Milo Rolo
 
Phony Benoni: Marco!
 
   Jun-10-22 Lilienthal vs Bondarevsky, 1947
 
Phony Benoni: Another one for you King Hunters. Black's monarch travels fron g8 to b8, then takes the Great Circle Route back to h3 before calling it a day.
 
   Jun-10-22 GrahamClayton chessforum (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: <GrahamClayton> I've posted a question for you at L T Magee vs J Holland, 1948
 
   Jun-10-22 L T Magee vs E L Holland, 1948 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: <GrahamClayton> The source you cite, <Chess Review, May 1948, p. 24>, gives Black's name as <E Holland> "Chess Life" (June 5, 1948, p. 1) has a table of results giving <E L Holland>. That form also appears in USCF rating supplements for a player fro ...
 
   Jun-09-22 Biographer Bistro (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: SkinnVer Here Among the Fold?
 
   Jun-09-22 Flohr vs Bondarevsky, 1947 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Black's bishop makes me think of Godzilla emerging from the depths of the ocean to wreak havoc. However, in the end it's his Two Little Friends who steal the show. Well, maybe not so litt.
 
   Jun-06-22 W Ritson-Morry vs G T Crown, 1947
 
Phony Benoni: it was the last round. Rison-Morry was mired in last place. These things happen.
 
   Jun-06-22 W Adams vs M Kagan, 1947
 
Phony Benoni: Some more informztion. The game was published in <Chess Review>, March 1948, p. 23. Black's name is given as "M Kagan", and the location as "Massachusetts". There is no other game data, but I think we can now safely assume Black is <Milton Kagan>. Earlier in the ...
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Living in the Past

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 381 OF 914 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: If I'm reading the comment to rule 9.02(c) correctly, the appeal on a half-swing does not have to be made immediately:

<Appeals on a half-swing may only be made on the call of ball and when asked to appeal the home base umpire must refer to a base umpire for his judgment on the swing. Should the base umpire call the pitch a strike, the strike call shall prevail.

Baserunners must be alert to the possibility that the base umpire on appeal may reverse the call of a ball to the call of a strike, in which event the runner is in jeopardy of being out by a catcher's throw. Also a catcher must be alert on a base stealing situation if a ball call is reversed to a strike by the base umpire upon appeal from the plate umpire.

The ball is in play on appeal on a half swing.>

Since the ball remains live, I would assume that the call can be appealed after the catcher throws to second. By the way, note that supposedly only the manager and catcher have this privilege, not the pitcher.

So if say the count is 3 and 2 and the runner takes off while the batter checks his swing, I would have to assume that the catcher has the right to throw before appealing. To say he must wait would be unfair to the defense. If the ball call stands, then the throw is wasted, but it's hard to think that it wouldn't be made for strategical reasons.

But here's a funny situation: the runner takes off, overslides second, and is tagged out before he gets back to the bag. He's out, even if the ball call stands.

May-18-12  Jim Bartle: I was not aware the appeal could be made later. That's interesting.

But...3-2 pitch, ump calls a strike on a check swing, catcher throws the ball into centerfield and runner goes to third. Then the base umpire says no swing. Well, there's a runner on third instead of second.

But let me understand. On a three-ball count, the home plate umpire calls a ball, the catcher fires to second as the runner slows down seeing the ball four call, he's tagged by the shortstop. Doesn't seem to matter, he's got second on the walk.

Then the catcher appeals? Ump calls strike and we've got a double play.

Of course these are major league players who shouldn't be throwing balls into centerfield and should run hard when stealing, so maybe it doesn't matter.

May-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <JB: But...3-2 pitch, ump calls a strike on a check swing, catcher throws the ball into centerfield and runner goes to third. Then the base umpire says no swing. Well, there's a runner on third instead of second.>

If the home plate ump calls a strike, that's the end of the matter. The only appeal is for a pitch called a ball.

<But let me understand. On a three-ball count, the home plate umpire calls a ball, the catcher fires to second as the runner slows down seeing the ball four call, he's tagged by the shortstop. Doesn't seem to matter, he's got second on the walk.

Then the catcher appeals? Ump calls strike and we've got a double play.>

Yes.

May-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Here's a game ending situation in the championship of a softball tournament I watched.

One out, tie game, runners on first and second, line drive to the pitcher. Runner on second holds, but runner on first takes a few steps toward second. Ball is caught, two outs, then throw to first to double up that runner. Ball is thrown into right field. Runner on first is headed back to first when he sees the throw sail into right, and stops, and begins running to second. The ball is live, the runner on second is on the base after the catch, so he's free to advance. The runner on first never tagged up after the catch, so he's still liable to be doubled up. The right fielder gets the ball and throws home (he should have thrown to first), hoping to get the runner there, but wasn't in time. At that point, the defense walked off the field. Many fans were screaming for the fielding team to throw to first, but the appeal play, though the third out of the inning, would have failed to keep the run from scoring since that out would have been recorded after the runner crossed the plate.

May-18-12  Jim Bartle: "If the home plate ump calls a strike, that's the end of the matter. The only appeal is for a pitch called a ball."

Honestly, I didn't know that. Now that I think about it, since it's only the catcher who appeals, it's obvious. The batter never appeals a strike call. King of dumb on my part.

Overall it's a good rule, because the base umpire has a better view of how far the bat came forward than the home plate ump.

May-18-12  Jim Bartle: In that softball game, really dumb of the team on the field not to appeal at first. Not the rightfielder's fault, because he might not have seen, but certainly the first baseman and the manager should have noticed.

My question is, after the exact same play, but if after the "winning" run scored, the team on the field had made the appeal to first, would the run have counted?

Since that was the third out, I'm pretty sure it would have wiped out the run. If there had been no outs, the run would count and the game would be over.

May-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Again, the rulebook can be consulted at

http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/downloads/y2...

I think this is an appeal situation as covered by Rule 7.10:

<Any runner shall be called out, on appeal, when--

(a) After a fly ball is caught, he fails to touch his original base before he or his original base is tagged....

Any appeal under this rule must be made before the next pitch, or any play or attempted play. If the violation occurs during a play which ends a half-inning, the appeal must be made before the defensive team leaves the field.>

Like a force play, a later appeal can cancel runs that have scored. The rule gives the situation. Say there are two outs when a couple of runners score, but the first one misses the plate. If the first runner is later declared out on appeal, that cancels the run "scored" by the second runner.

Then there is the famous "fourth out" possibility. Let's go back to <OCF>'s scenario, but say it's the eighth inning with one out and the bases loaded. Line drive to the pitcher is out two. Runner is off first, but pitcher throws wild into right field. Runner on third scores, but runner on second is thrown out at home for the third out.

If the runner on first never retouched the bag, the defending can remain on the field, appeal at first, and get a "fourth out". This takes precedence on the play, and the run does not count.

Or, even funnier, say the runner from first is eventually cut down trying to reach third. The defending team should still appeal to get their fourth out and cancel the runs, leaving the unusual situation where a runner makes two outs on the same play!

May-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: I don't want to alarm anybody, but Justin Verlander is up to his old tricks tonight.
May-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Yeah, I see that J.V. is losing to the Pirates (of all teams, 14-0). Those interceptions will kill ya.
May-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <My question is, after the exact same play, but if after the "winning" run scored, the team on the field had made the appeal to first, would the run have counted?>

Yes. When the third out is recorded on a non-force play, the determining factor is which happened first, the runner touching home, or the out recorded.

May-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <Like a force play, a later appeal can cancel runs that have scored. The rule gives the situation. Say there are two outs when a couple of runners score, but the first one misses the plate. If the first runner is later declared out on appeal, that cancels the run "scored" by the second runner.>

That's because the first runner didn't legally touch home plate. Once that is established, no subsequent runs can score.

<Then there is the famous "fourth out" possibility. Let's go back to <OCF>'s scenario, but say it's the eighth inning with one out and the bases loaded. Line drive to the pitcher is out two. Runner is off first, but pitcher throws wild into right field. Runner on third scores, but runner on second is thrown out at home for the third out.

If the runner on first never retouched the bag, the defending can remain on the field, appeal at first, and get a "fourth out". This takes precedence on the play, and the run does not count.>

I disagree. I need to review the rules since it's been a while.

May-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: One down in the 9th...
May-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: There goes the no-no...
May-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Blast it, why weren't they playing at Pittsburgh? The only hit for the Pirates was by their DH!
May-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Why a runner missing home plate ends an inning even if others behind him touched home:

<Unless two are out, the status of a following runner is not affected by a preceding runner’s failure to touch or retouch a base. If, upon appeal, the preceding runner is the third out, no runners following him shall score. If such third out is the result of a force play, neither preceding nor following runners shall score.>

Why the run in the softball game would count:

Rule 2.0 <Example: Not a force out. One out. Runner on first and third. Batter flies out. Two out. Runner on third tags up and scores. Runner on first tries to retouch before throw from fielder reaches first baseman, but does not get back in time and is out. Three outs. If, in umpire’s judgment, the runner from third touched home before the ball was held at first base, the run counts.>

May-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Funny Dusty Baker story: http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/7...
May-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Does this goes into the box score as HBP (2)? http://espn.go.com/boston/mlb/story...

Speaking of box scores, this is from Jim Capel's CSI Column. I came no where close, because I never heard of any of these pitchers.

http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2012/051...

May-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <OhioChessFan> The last couple of paragraphs under rule 7.10 (see the link I gave to the rules above) cover the "fourth out" possibility. True, I cannot find a direct quote stating that getting the third out on an appeal play cancels any runs that have scored during the play; however, there would be no use bothering with the "fourth out" were that not so. Of course, my logic may be flawed.
May-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <WannaBe>: Here you go:

http://www.retrosheet.org/boxesetc/...

The key was realizing that Washington's pitchers threw only 8 2/3 innings. The home team can never do that unless the game is stopped due to weather or some other reason.

From the pitchers, I knew it was a late 60s-early 70s game, and then it hit me. The expansion Washington Senators forfeited their last home game in 1971 when the fans stormed the field.

Also note that no winning or losing pitcher is given. There are none in a forfeited game.

May-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <True, I cannot find a direct quote stating that getting the third out on an appeal play cancels any runs that have scored during the play; however, there would be no use bothering with the "fourth out" were that not so. Of course, my logic may be flawed.>

Bases loaded. One out. Line drive to pitcher. Two outs. Throw to first gets to the outfield. Runner doesn't go back to first. Appeal is made and runner is called out. Runner from third crosses the plate before the appeal is made at first. Run scores. However, the runner from third misses home. Defense now appeals to that base. That runner is out, the 4th out, and the run doesn't score.

May-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Why exactly did the fans storm the field?
May-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <OCF> From http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/page... (very funny article, by the way)

<CSI: Box Score Answer

This wasn't easy, but there were a couple clues. One, the innings pitched for the home team add up to only 8 2/3 instead of nine. Also, there is no winning or losing pitcher listed for either team. That wasn't due to an oversight; it was because this was the last home game the Senators played in 1971 before moving to Texas the next season. The Senators led 7-5 heading into the ninth; but with two outs, fans swarmed the field for souvenirs, prompting the umpires to halt play and declare a forfeit. That cost the Senators (and reliever Paul Lindblad) a victory in what would be the final major league game in Washington for more than three decades.>

May-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Oh goodie, that Washington-storm-the-field game only took place about 45 days before I was born...

Maybe I can ask my Mom about it.

May-19-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Before you go here to find the answer (look for the paragraph on Verlander's one-hitter last night):

http://espn.go.com/espn/elias

See if you can guess which major league team has gone the longest without being victims of a no-hitter.

May-19-12  Jim Bartle: When I saw that CSI box score, and Kekich as NY's starter, I immediately looked for Peterson as well, thinking it might be an early double switch. No such luck.
Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 914)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 381 OF 914 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC