chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

Phony Benoni
Member since Feb-10-06 · Last seen Jun-11-22
Greetings, O Seeker After Knowledge! You have arrived in Dearborn, Michigan (whether you like it or not), and are reading words of wisdom from a player rated 2938--plus or minus 1000 points.

However, I've retired from serious play--not that I ever took playing chess all that seriously. You only have to look at my games to see that. These days I pursue the simple pleasures of finding games that are bizarre or just plain funny. I'd rather enjoy a game than analyze it.

For the record, my name is David Moody. This probably means nothing to you unless you're a longtime player from Michigan, though it's possible that if you attended any US Opens from 1975-1999 we might have crossed paths. Lucky you.

If you know me at all, you'll realize that most of my remarks are meant to be humorous. I do this deliberately, so that if my analysis stinks to High Heaven I can always say that I was just joking.

As you can undoubtedly tell from my sparkling wit, I'm a librarian in my spare time. Even worse, I'm a cataloger, which means I keep log books for cattle. Also, I'm not one of those extroverts who sit at the Reference Desk and help you with research. Instead, I spend all day staring at a computer screen updating and maintaining information in the library's catalog. The general public thinks Reference Librarians are dull. Reference Librarians think Catalogers are dull.

My greatest achievement in chess, other than tricking you into reading this, was probably mating with king, bishop and knight against king in a tournament game. I have to admit that this happened after an adjournment, and that I booked up like crazy before resuming. By the way, the fact I have had adjourned games shows you I've been around too long.

My funniest moment occurred when I finally got a chance to pull off a smothered mate in actual play. You know, 1.Nf7+ Kg8 2.Nh6+ Kh8 3.Qg8+ Rxg8 4.Nf7#. When I played the climactic queen check my opponent looked at the board in shocked disbelief and said, "But that's not mate! I can take the queen!"

Finally, I must confess that I once played a positional move, back around 1982. I'll try not to let that happen again.

>> Click here to see Phony Benoni's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   Phony Benoni has kibitzed 18634 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jun-11-22 M Blau vs Keres, 1959 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Not a good recommendation for the DERLD. Out of 59 moves, White makes only three in Black's half of the board. And two of those conist of 3.Bb5 and 6.Bxc6.
 
   Jun-11-22 chessgames.com chessforum (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Er, it's back. Karpov vs Timman, 1988
 
   Jun-10-22 Orlo Milo Rolo
 
Phony Benoni: Marco!
 
   Jun-10-22 Lilienthal vs Bondarevsky, 1947
 
Phony Benoni: Another one for you King Hunters. Black's monarch travels fron g8 to b8, then takes the Great Circle Route back to h3 before calling it a day.
 
   Jun-10-22 GrahamClayton chessforum (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: <GrahamClayton> I've posted a question for you at L T Magee vs J Holland, 1948
 
   Jun-10-22 L T Magee vs E L Holland, 1948 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: <GrahamClayton> The source you cite, <Chess Review, May 1948, p. 24>, gives Black's name as <E Holland> "Chess Life" (June 5, 1948, p. 1) has a table of results giving <E L Holland>. That form also appears in USCF rating supplements for a player fro ...
 
   Jun-09-22 Biographer Bistro (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: SkinnVer Here Among the Fold?
 
   Jun-09-22 Flohr vs Bondarevsky, 1947 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Black's bishop makes me think of Godzilla emerging from the depths of the ocean to wreak havoc. However, in the end it's his Two Little Friends who steal the show. Well, maybe not so litt.
 
   Jun-06-22 W Ritson-Morry vs G T Crown, 1947
 
Phony Benoni: it was the last round. Rison-Morry was mired in last place. These things happen.
 
   Jun-06-22 W Adams vs M Kagan, 1947
 
Phony Benoni: Some more informztion. The game was published in <Chess Review>, March 1948, p. 23. Black's name is given as "M Kagan", and the location as "Massachusetts". There is no other game data, but I think we can now safely assume Black is <Milton Kagan>. Earlier in the ...
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Living in the Past

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 397 OF 914 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-14-12  Jim Bartle: I'd have to say no on Helton, unless he somehow keeps going and gets 3000 hits, which looks doubtful. Maybe if he'd played one of the other infield positions well, or centerfield, he'd deserve it, but as a first baseman, I just don't see it.

He does have a lifetime .421 on-base percentage, which is awfully good, and was over .400 for eight straight years. And .390 lifetime on the road, which is also good.

Among the Rockies, I'd put Larry Walker ahead of Helton.

Jul-14-12  Jim Bartle: Just saw a variation on the Mark-Buehrle-between-the-legs play from a couple of years ago in the Cleveland-Toronto game (Tribe has come back from down 11-3 to 11-9).

Smash off the pitcher's leg into foul territory, first baseman runs over and dribbles it toward first with his glove, behind his back. Pitcher gets the "throw" and basically blocks the runner (interferes) and tags him, also steps on the bag just in time. Tough call for the ump, but great play by the first baseman.

Jul-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <PB> and <Jim> Wondered whether you'd agree and you obviously do: Helton doesn't have the goods to get in there. Without Coors, he's lucky to have 2000 hits, though over 1300 runs scored and batted in are decent. Had he done a little more since 2004, I still wouldn't be convinced that would be enough.

<Jim> At first when you mentioned Walker, I was sceptical, and I still don't know: his numbers were frightening when he was healthy, but he only played 150 games once in his career. At their respective peaks, I like Walker over Helton, though.

Walker's career stats:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/p...

Helton:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/p...

Jul-14-12  Jim Bartle: Both Walker and Helton are trapped in "Dwight Evans World," populated by really good players who aren't/weren't quite good enough to be Hall of Famers.
Jul-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Jim> While there are worse players than Evans in Cooperstown, I'm not an inclusionist when it comes to this. In fact, I believe the HOF could quietly ease a few players out and not even have it noticed.
Jul-14-12  Jim Bartle: All I meant to say is there are an awful lot of really good players who aren't really Hall of Famers. Guys like Jeff Kent, Darryl Strawberry, Curt Flood, Ken Boyer (though he has a case), Bert Blyleven, David Ortiz, Gary Sheffield, Bobby Grich, Andy Pettite, Mike Mussina, Bill Freehan, Dave Concepcion, Lew Burdette, etc.

I think when you go to a game and see a guy who's played ten years or so, and you can say, "There's an all-time great," that's a Hall of Famer. Not somebody you look at after his career is over and you say, "Hey, that guy had a pretty great career."

Jul-14-12  I play the Fred: <I think when you go to a game and see a guy who's played ten years or so, and you can say, "There's an all-time great," that's a Hall of Famer. Not somebody you look at after his career is over and you say, "Hey, that guy had a pretty great career.">

That's a rather slipshod way to approach the issue. We're talking about enshrining people for a (more or less) permanent honor, and for that candidates deserve a more rigorous process.

Jul-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Jim> Absolutely-most of those players you named have enough going for them to merit consideration in the minds of many HOF voters, but there are either significant negatives or not quite enough on the positive side of the ledger. Believe Bill James once coined a term called the 'Bobby Bonds line', which he used, as he put it, to classify players of unquestioned excellence but marginal greatness.

By your criterion in the second paragraph, Albert Pujols is the gold standard; if he never picked up another bat, he'd go in, first ballot. Frank Thomas, same thing when his turn comes-his numbers were monstrous from 1991-97, though he wasn't much of a first baseman. Only thing I see holding him out come 2014 is the same taint which kept Jeff Bagwell (another monster) from first-ballot land, and unfairly so, in my opinion.

Jul-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Blyleven made it, M. Wills still haven't, R. Dempsey is a good player, longevity for a catcher, M. Sciocia also, who broke in '80 and retired in '92 (all with the Dodgers), won World Series in '81 and '88 as player, and guided Angels to their World Series win over the Giants.

The list can go on and on and on...

Jul-15-12  Travis Bickle: Hey Phony, before ya know it the NFL players will be reporting to training camp in preparation for Pre-Season football!
Jul-15-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Hey, Travis, looks like next week for most teams. Here's a schedule:

http://www.thehuddle.com/2012/nfl/n...

Bears report July 25th, Lions veterans July 26th. Makes sense. The Bears are going to need that extra day of practice.

Jul-15-12  Travis Bickle: Yeah they want to work that extra day on getting to Stafford! LOL!
Jul-15-12  Shams: <Travis> Sounds like the Bears are hoping to play that kid from Boise State off the end. If he works out that's pretty good bookend pass rushers. Once again Seattle is going to Chicago this year. Might as well join the damn North.
Jul-15-12  Travis Bickle: <Shams> I sure hope that kid from Boise State lives up to expectations at DE for The Bears. The Bears were the favorites to get superstar DE Mario Williams. Of course the cheap Chicago owners, The damn McCaskey's went the draft route. Julius Peppers & Mario Williams would strike terror in NFL QB's! There was a nice crop of Offensive lineman which The Bears have needed forever who they could have selected with a 1st round pick. We'll see.
Jul-15-12  Jim Bartle: I play the fred: Of course my method is slipshod. It's just a general feeling about which players are Hall of Famers are and which aren't.
Jul-15-12  playground player: <Wannabe> Rick Dempsey in the Hall of Fame? Rick Dempsey??? But not Thurman Munson, Earl Battey, Gus Triandos, Del Crandall, and any number of catchers who were better than Dempsey and Scioscia put together? Can we at least bypass Chris Cannizarro?
Jul-15-12  Jim Bartle: If they open a comedy wing of the Hall of Fame, Dempsey would waltz in alongside Bob Uecker, Jay Johnstone and Andy van Slyke.
Jul-15-12  Jim Bartle: Anyone heard of Mysterious Walker? Wonder why he got the name. Maybe the mystery was why he was permitted to get a 4-16 record in the Federal League.

http://www.retrosheet.org/boxesetc/...

Jul-15-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: In '88 when the Dodgers had D. Sutton, R. Dempsey on the team, one night, they formed (back then, I believe) the oldest combined age for pitcher-catcher.

"Sutton was clocked at 95 mph, the throw to me was at 75, and I threw it back at 20" -- Dempsey

Or something similiar/along those lines.

Jul-15-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Hmm. 136 walks, 143 strikeouts. Maybe it was a mystery where the ball was going.

"Mysterious" may have been part of a non-de-plume, allowing him to play professional baseball without losing his amateur status. Judging by his results, there was little chance of the latter. But he did have his good days:

http://fultonhistory.com/Newspaper%...

And here he comes close to pitching a no-hitter:

http://fultonhistory.com/Newspaper%...

But there were even more bad days:

http://fultonhistory.com/Newspaper%...

He appears to have been a colorful eccentric. See the bottom of the second column:

http://fultonhistory.com/Newspaper%...

Was also was a spitballer, which may have contributed to his control issues.

Jul-15-12  I play the Fred: <I play the fred: Of course my method is slipshod. It's just a general feeling about which players are Hall of Famers are and which aren't.>

Sorry, Jim. I think I read the original post as <This is the only way to choose a Hall of Famer>. I wasn't having a banner evening then.

Jul-15-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: 'Strange' play at last night's SD-LAD game:

<Pinch-runner Everth Cabrera decided to steal home when Los Angeles closer Kenley Jansen turned his back walking on the mound. The closer hurriedly threw the ball over catcher A.J. Ellis and to the backstop, allowing Cabrera to score, and Will Venable followed from second on the error, giving the Padres the lead for good.>

So, did the umpire signal play ball? Once the ball is returned to the pitcher with base-runner(s) on, is the ball automatically in play?

Jul-15-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Both that LA-SD play and the CLE-TOR play <JB> mentioned yesterday can be seen here:

http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?c...

<WannaBe> I think the point is that the ball was never out of play. The ball becomes dead only when time is called, something that is not automatically done after each pitch. This looks like a case of the Padres observing the pitcher's habits and taking an advantage offered to them under the rules.

<JB> If there was any interference on the play, it was offensive interference by the batter against the pitcher. The rules clearly give the benefit to the fielder in that situation, which is as it should be as he is the one more likely to be injured in the situation. It is up to the batter to avoid the interference.

First, two definitions from rule 2.00:

"OFFENSIVE INTERFERENCE is an act by the team at bat which interferes with, obstructs, impedes, hinders, or confuses any fielder attempting to make a play."

Defensive interference only involves interfering with the hitter. When a runner is involved, it is obstruction.

"OBSTRUCTION is the act of a fielder who, <while not in possession of the ball and not in the act of fielding>, impedes the progress of any runner."

Here, the pitcher was clearly in the act of fielding the ball, so he is protected. There is even a comment to that effect.

So it was the batter's responsibility to avoid any interference. 6.05k notes that the batter is normally out for running outside the three foot line:

"...except that he may run outside (to the right of) or inside (to the left of) the foul line to avoid a fielder attempting to field a batted ball..."

So the batter could have been called out for interference had the play not been made.

Jul-15-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Dum': http://espn.go.com/new-york/nba/sto...

Dumer(?): http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/8...

Jul-15-12  Jim Bartle: Aside from the play itself, the clip of Cabrera stealing home featured to of the all-time great announcers, Dick Enberg and Vin Scully.

I wonder about who was interfering on that play at first. It seems ambiguous to me. First of all, he was catching a "throw," not fielding a hit ball. Not sure whether that matters.

But it did seem possible to say the pitcher was standing in front of first base before the ball arrived, meaning he wasn't fielding the ball. In truth it seemed he was more just standing on the bag, not in front of it.

Later in the day, maybe the same game, I saw a drive take one bounce and hit the pitcher in the shin. It bounced nice as you please to the first baseman, who just stepped on the bag.

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 914)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 397 OF 914 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC