chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

Phony Benoni
Member since Feb-10-06 · Last seen Jun-11-22
Greetings, O Seeker After Knowledge! You have arrived in Dearborn, Michigan (whether you like it or not), and are reading words of wisdom from a player rated 2938--plus or minus 1000 points.

However, I've retired from serious play--not that I ever took playing chess all that seriously. You only have to look at my games to see that. These days I pursue the simple pleasures of finding games that are bizarre or just plain funny. I'd rather enjoy a game than analyze it.

For the record, my name is David Moody. This probably means nothing to you unless you're a longtime player from Michigan, though it's possible that if you attended any US Opens from 1975-1999 we might have crossed paths. Lucky you.

If you know me at all, you'll realize that most of my remarks are meant to be humorous. I do this deliberately, so that if my analysis stinks to High Heaven I can always say that I was just joking.

As you can undoubtedly tell from my sparkling wit, I'm a librarian in my spare time. Even worse, I'm a cataloger, which means I keep log books for cattle. Also, I'm not one of those extroverts who sit at the Reference Desk and help you with research. Instead, I spend all day staring at a computer screen updating and maintaining information in the library's catalog. The general public thinks Reference Librarians are dull. Reference Librarians think Catalogers are dull.

My greatest achievement in chess, other than tricking you into reading this, was probably mating with king, bishop and knight against king in a tournament game. I have to admit that this happened after an adjournment, and that I booked up like crazy before resuming. By the way, the fact I have had adjourned games shows you I've been around too long.

My funniest moment occurred when I finally got a chance to pull off a smothered mate in actual play. You know, 1.Nf7+ Kg8 2.Nh6+ Kh8 3.Qg8+ Rxg8 4.Nf7#. When I played the climactic queen check my opponent looked at the board in shocked disbelief and said, "But that's not mate! I can take the queen!"

Finally, I must confess that I once played a positional move, back around 1982. I'll try not to let that happen again.

>> Click here to see Phony Benoni's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   Phony Benoni has kibitzed 18634 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jun-11-22 M Blau vs Keres, 1959 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Not a good recommendation for the DERLD. Out of 59 moves, White makes only three in Black's half of the board. And two of those conist of 3.Bb5 and 6.Bxc6.
 
   Jun-11-22 chessgames.com chessforum (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Er, it's back. Karpov vs Timman, 1988
 
   Jun-10-22 Orlo Milo Rolo
 
Phony Benoni: Marco!
 
   Jun-10-22 Lilienthal vs Bondarevsky, 1947
 
Phony Benoni: Another one for you King Hunters. Black's monarch travels fron g8 to b8, then takes the Great Circle Route back to h3 before calling it a day.
 
   Jun-10-22 GrahamClayton chessforum (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: <GrahamClayton> I've posted a question for you at L T Magee vs J Holland, 1948
 
   Jun-10-22 L T Magee vs E L Holland, 1948 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: <GrahamClayton> The source you cite, <Chess Review, May 1948, p. 24>, gives Black's name as <E Holland> "Chess Life" (June 5, 1948, p. 1) has a table of results giving <E L Holland>. That form also appears in USCF rating supplements for a player fro ...
 
   Jun-09-22 Biographer Bistro (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: SkinnVer Here Among the Fold?
 
   Jun-09-22 Flohr vs Bondarevsky, 1947 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Black's bishop makes me think of Godzilla emerging from the depths of the ocean to wreak havoc. However, in the end it's his Two Little Friends who steal the show. Well, maybe not so litt.
 
   Jun-06-22 W Ritson-Morry vs G T Crown, 1947
 
Phony Benoni: it was the last round. Rison-Morry was mired in last place. These things happen.
 
   Jun-06-22 W Adams vs M Kagan, 1947
 
Phony Benoni: Some more informztion. The game was published in <Chess Review>, March 1948, p. 23. Black's name is given as "M Kagan", and the location as "Massachusetts". There is no other game data, but I think we can now safely assume Black is <Milton Kagan>. Earlier in the ...
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Living in the Past

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 119 OF 914 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-26-09  Jim Bartle: Derek Jeter, I think. He got a hit after midnight on November 1.
Oct-26-09  technical draw: <JB> Right, it was Jeter, but it was a home run:

"When the scoreboard clock in Yankee Stadium passed midnight, World Series play in November began. Derek Jeter hit an opposite field walk-off home run on a 3–2 pitch count from Kim. This walk-off home run gave the Yankees a 4–3 victory and tied the Series at two, making Jeter the first player to hit a November home run and earning him the tongue-in-cheek nickname of "Mr. November."

Against the Arizona Diamondbacks. (maybe that's why I thought of Luis Gonzalez)

Oct-26-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Sometime, I'm going to have to research major league players whose fathers were also major leaguers, and see how many were born from July to December.

A good majority, I would hope.

Oct-26-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...
Oct-26-09  Jim Bartle: Opinions on where the NY infield rates?

The best I can remember are from the 70s, the Reds (Perez, Morgan, Concepcion, Rose) and Dodgers (Garvey, Lopes, Russell, Cey). The 1964 Cardinals (White, Javier, Groat, Boyer) got a lot of attention when all were named to the All-Star team, but I'd say they're a notch below. Same with the Orioles of Powell, Johnson, Belanger, and Robinson.

Looks to me as if today's Yankees are right up there.

Oct-27-09  jack1501: hello Phony Benoni

i compliment you on your game of the day collections.

Oct-27-09  jack1501: i noticed in your 2004 game of the day collection that you have omitted the game for 5 - 7 - 2004, that game id # 1283538 . and did you know that 8 - 19 - 2004 has two games in the data base. those two games are 1286144 and 1071125.
Oct-27-09  jack1501: i also noticed that you have these game of the day dates missing: 5 - 8 - 2004
10 - 22 - 2004
4 - 30 - 2005
10 - 25 -2005

( i feel like the games for these dates have been repeated )

i also am missing those dates from a list that i started during the first Christmas contest. i was missing about 100 games from my list but i have filled it in with the help of your lists.

I HUMBLY THANK YOU FOR YOUR LISTS !!

do you know if the 4 - 27 -2004 game of the day # 1103292 is the first game of the day sponsored by this website? or is it just the oldest one that has not been repeated?

if you ever make it to Tyler Tx, tuesday and friday night is chess nights at the Tyler Chess Center. i usually play on friday nights, look me up and i'll play you a game of chess.

Oct-27-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <jack1501>

1) I know I had the game for May-07-04 (#1283538) on the list, since I have started compiling indexes by player and pun and it was there then. I must have erased it somehow. Thanks for bringing it back.

2) As for the Aug-19-04 situation, chessgames.com made a note on #1286144 explaining the situation. Perhaps I should still include the game, though, since it does have a header.

3) As for May-08-04, Oct-22-04, Apr-30-05, and Oct-25-05, you could be right that they were later used as repeats. I don't know how to find them without going through kibitzing for later days, and I decided I wasn't going to hold the collections until I got around to doing that.

Another possibility, which I found several times, is that a GOTD is later found to be a duplicate and merged with another without transferring the "Game-of-the-Day" header to the new number.

Thanks for the kind words! As you find other mistakes, please don't hesitate to bring them to my attention. (By the way, if you want to find them quickly do "gameoftheday" as a search onthe collections page.)

Finally, I'll probably never make it back to Texas. I've played there twice (US Open in Fort Worth, 1984, and the Texas State Championship at Dallas in 1999) but I don't travel much any more for health reasons. Besides, I can't fly because I can't find my birth certificate. They don't make stone tablets like they used to.

Oct-27-09  playground player: <Phony Benoni> Let me see if I understand this. You can't fly because you can't find your birth certificate? The solution is simple. Get elected president, and fly on Air Force One!
Oct-27-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <playground player> Alas, politics is not my field. Let me explain how I learned this.

Back in 1977, I actually served as a Delegate from Michigan during the USCF meetings at the US Open. I then made the mistake of trying to play chess immediately afterward.

I was playing White, and got up from the board to take a stretch. When I returned, my opponent had made his move to reach this position:


click for larger view

"That's interesting", I thought. "I can take his queen. But he's rated 1972, so he must have something up his sleeve. Let me think about it."

It didn't take long to see the point: after 21.cxb3, Black plays 21...Nd4+. I can play 22.Kd2, but he plays 22...Rc2+ and indeed regains the queen. But that gets sort of complicated; I wonder if his pieces will get tangled up and I can win one of them.

After a few minutes, I realized that wasn't going to work. Then I had to decide whether to even take the queen. "Let's see; 20.c3 Nd4--no, that could get hairy. Or maybe..."

Finally I remembered something. When I had left the board for my stroll, I had a knight on b3. <It took me fifteen minutes to realize I was a piece down.>

I've stayed out of politics ever since.

Oct-27-09  hms123: <Phoney Benoni>

<It took me fifteen minutes to realize I was a piece down.>

That is a great story. So what did you play? I guess you had to take the Queen and see what happened.

Oct-27-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: Thought the date October 22, 2004 sounded familiar somehow. The game of the day was this: Janowski vs Samisch, 1925
Oct-27-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <SwitchingQuylthulg> Thanks for the information, but do you have any idea what the pun was?

<hms123> I resigned the game, but that may not have been the wisest course. After all, if I was so brain dead as not to be able to tell I was a piece down, why should I trust my judgment that the position was resignable?

Oct-27-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: <Phony Benoni: do you have any idea what the pun was?>

Conflicting records in the cerebral catalog, but most probably I never saw the pun. Can't remember when my memory last worked.

Going by the rather unenthusiastic public reaction to the pun though, there's a chance it was a true gem of unoriginality that could be worth digging for.

Oct-27-09  hms123: <Phoney Benoni> Thanks for the response. Looking at the position more closely, I see that you did the right thing.
Oct-27-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: <Phony Benoni> For GOTD 2004 I nominate Karpov vs Gulko, 1996 "The Jewel of Oropesa" as the missing entry for 5/8/04, even though it has been used two or three times later. There are 8 kibitzing comments by 6 posters, without really interacting with each other, so they may well have seen it on the home page that day. Please review.
Oct-27-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <tpstar> It's possible, but I do see some connections in the kibitzes. However, Kevin86 usually comments on the GOTD, so that's a mark in its favor.

I hesitate because I hope it's not the right game; that would be twice in 2004 for the game, and a game can only show up once in a collection. But I'll keep it in mind. Thanks.

Oct-28-09  technical draw: The National League is just a glorified AAA league. The American league has won the last 13 All Star games. The Phillies are champs only because they played the lowly Tampa Bay Bucs in the 2008 WS. I see just hand out the rings to the Yankees today and just assume a 4-1 finish.
Oct-28-09  Jim Bartle: I agree the Yankees look far superior to the Phils. No question. But I remember the A's were considered unbeatable in both 88 and 90, and they got a total of one game against LA and Cincinnati. (nasal Howard Cosell voice) "That's why they play the games."
Oct-28-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <td> First the American League has <not> won 13 All-Star games in a row. There was a tie in 2002, remember?

Secondly, these things go in cycles. The AL started by winning 12 of 16 up till 1949. Then the NL won 33 of 42, including one stretch of 19-1 between 1963-1982. Now the AL is doing fairly well again. Overall, the NL still holds a two game lead.

Overall, I think the Yankees have to be favored for better overall balance in both hitting and pitching. But tonight will be a good indicator. Sabbathia has only faced the Phillies once, the playoff game last year where they lit him up pretty good. If he continues this year's dominant form, the Yankees are in good shape. If the Phils rough him up again, the Yankees could be in trouble.

Oct-28-09  Jim Bartle: The All-Star comments set me to looking at some old games, and found the notorious 1967 game, 15 innings, 30 strikeouts, and a 2-1 NL victory on a Tony Perez homer: http://www.retrosheet.org/boxesetc/...

The game was played in the late afternoon in Anaheim, so the lighting wasn't great for hitters. But Ed Runge had to ice his right arm afterward from calling so many batters out on strikes, including Clemente four times and Dick Allen three. Runge decided the outside corner extended six inches farther and just kept ringing guys up like eating potato chips.

Also interesting to see neither Mantle nor Mays started, but Juan Marichal did, in his only poor year of the 60s.

Oct-28-09  technical draw: <PB>. Thanks for those stats. I've always wondered about using past performance to determine strategy in a game. Like, "he's batting .312 against left handed Phillies pitchers". But none of those pitchers are pitching against him today so why even bring that up?

Also using team statistics of 5 years ago when very few of those playing today were on that team.

Also is there REALLY a difference in a post season game as opposed to a regular season game? Aren't players always trying to win?

Of course if it weren't for statistics baseball would be a very dull game!

Oct-28-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <td> There is a real difference in the post season, and not just the extra pressure of being in the spotlight and hiving a championship ride on the outcome.

In a seven game series, as opposed to a 162 game season, there are no days off. If you're dinged up, you play instead of resting. If you pitched yesterday, be ready to pitch today. If you've got a broken ankle, you still sit on the bench and pose a threat the other manager has to take into account.

Managers are more likely to play conservatively. They know both teams have good pitching, so one run will mean a lot. If a pitcher shows any weakness, he'll get yanked a lot quicker than he would in the regular season. (Unless his name is Bob Gibson and the manager wishes to live through the series.)

Yes, teams are always trying to win, but they are willing to play less than their strongest line-up during the regular season to rest players for the long haul. In the post season everything is compressed, intensified and magnified, and you do everything in your power to win every game.

Oct-28-09  Jim Bartle: The problem is when you get to using very specific statistics that it's based on very little data, and therefore doesn't mean all that much.

I think a postseason and a regular season game are equal except for the pitching. There are so many more off-days in the postseason that pitchers can be used more often, plus there's no worry about wearing out the arms next month or the month after that.

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 914)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 119 OF 914 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC