Interesting point by <keypusher> I can not comment on the specific point of <keypusher> because o have not studied it , however , his general point is worth pause and thought.

<keypusher> is like - both left wingers (including sane , constructive , rational left wingers) and right wingers spend time in bickering and bashing politicians of opposing ideologies , instead they should engage in objective , dispassionate analysis.

And that is one of the reasons I like decision of <Susan freeman> viz <no GW>

Other people too engage in bickering (And I wish they do not , I wish they emulate example of right winger <keypusher> and engage in objective , dispassionate analysis)

Also , right winger <keypusher> and other rogoffland citizens are honest (unless one makes definition of 'honesty ' very rigorous/stringent)

Let's have a clear definition of the duties/powers of EDITORS, MODERATORS, and the managerial role given to the McDonalds. I sure don't want to believe any manipulating information provided from an account that began as a harassing sock puppet last year.

And <George wallace>/<big pawn> is order of magnitude more vile than his buddy. He should never be allowed back , in my opinion.

<opie> I also saw that message here and on your own forum before it disappeared.>

I missed it.

Typical of these forums. You and the troll spout off that I don't know what is what, yet you refuse to inform. That's not fixing the problem. These forums shouldn't be about freely bashing paying members, they're meant to fix the problem, supposedly. So fix the problem by answering the question.

As an example, Rdb has 4 consecutive posts above (at some point, this possibility of run-on continuously posting should be prevented by technology) with approximately 17 name droppings, most names mentioned multiple times.

Is it really fair that certain grandstanding/backstabbing members come in and drop the names of others in any fashion -- good, bad, or indifferent and such posts are left up in violation of posting guidelines? Even if the post is not a violation, most people don't appreciate being dragged through the grapevine.

If this were about fixing problems, then read the post, take action if needed, and delete the post. People don't deserve to be permanently struck by another, all too often having read a few posts of/about the other, but certainly not all their posts, yet drew hard and fast conclusions and now wants to growl about said person in the forum.

Any post that contains someone else's name should not be left up more than 24-48 hours in a forum. People don't pay to use this website so somebody else can analyze them publicly and it becomes a permanent record where they feel the need to defend themselves against whatever notion somebody else has.

Even in your profile you were railing against me .

And even though I pointed out your fallacies about me , you refused to correct them nor you responded.

Are you trying to foster ill will against me in a malicious way ?

Your complaint against me was that I was using vile language .

I pointed out that no one is more vile than your buddy <George wallace>/<big pawn> . And yet , you did not say a word against <George wallace>/<big pawn>. I have yet to see you protesting when your right wing buddies are vile.

So , you are ok with your right wing buddies being vile.

I pointed out to you - umpteen times - that I was vile only against three of your buddies because they were very vile and refused to behave and I was civil to all other of yours buddies (that was before admins enforced guidelines on rogoffland). And yet you continued to rail against me .

People asked you to clean your profile but you refused.

And now you talking about fostering ill will. No one fosters more ill will than you except some of your right wing buddies.

Your right wing buddy <George wallace>/<big pawn> says that he does not want to cooperate with admins, he says that he would continue using vile insults against left wingers and admins should allow him doing that.

<Lol Whatever he posts is very right IMO.>

If she means right-wing and not right as in correct.

<All I’m saying if he’s right I want to be wrong.>

And you are wrong again.>

Just the asinine juvenile punk style of <kudzu>, coupled with a wordplay (maybe not even intended?) by <Suzz>.

But I'm confused by the "italicized" <get>... what does it mean, exactly, here?

(I think you mean <bippy>, aka <kudzu>. But <get is a new one to me)