chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

Susan Freeman
Member since Sep-23-18 · Last seen Dec-27-25
My son was Daniel Freeman, one of the founders and trail blazers of this remarkable site, who passed away suddenly and unexpectedly on July 24th , 2018. (My actual surname is not Freeman.)

Chessgames.com Full Member

   Susan Freeman has kibitzed 3381 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Dec-27-25 Chessgames - Politics (replies)
 
Susan Freeman: < The Integrity: <saffuna: I'm not triggered. I'm amused. You complain that ...> I asked you a liberal question you were too fearful and loathsome to answer. <So, where do you think liberal men insert these tampons? And where do you insert yours?> Be an adult ...
 
   Dec-26-25 chessgames.com chessforum
 
Susan Freeman: <MissS> I'll get after him.
 
   Dec-26-25 Kibitzer's Café (replies)
 
Susan Freeman: <HMM> Re: Packers. I hope. I do not know how Jordan Love is doing post concussion. Da Bears still suck!
 
   Dec-15-25 Chessgames - Sports (replies)
 
Susan Freeman: <HMM> A sad game in Denver today.
 
   Dec-13-25 Chessgames - Music (replies)
 
Susan Freeman: <Dec-04-25 saffuna: Guitarist Steve Cropper died. He was in Booker T and the MGs and played with Otis Redding, Wilson Pickett and most of the R&B and blues stars of the 60s and 70s. Never flashy but a great musician. He wrote or co-wrote Dock of the Bay, Midnight Hour, Mr. ...
 
   Dec-07-25 Susan Freeman chessforum (replies)
 
Susan Freeman: <Rbd> everything you state in all your opinions, reeks of censorship. Just sayin
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 33 OF 49 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-14-23  Rdb: <fredthebear: It's June, almost half the year is gone. This is apparently the First Reasonable Chess post the mega poster Rdb has made in 2023. If there are other useful chess posts, prove me wrong.>

I am sure you have some point - spell it out please .

Meanwhile , let me point out that your buddy <colonel motimer> never makes a chess post.

Yesterday , your buddy <mort> made 8 consecutive posts and about 20 in total . May be more , may be 30 , may be 40.

All on rogoff forum.

There are other things about posts of <mort> which may put you in very , very bad light but that for some other time.

Now , put up or shut up , <fredthebear> , with due regards.

.

Jun-16-23  Rdb: Bravo <fredthebear>! well done !

Such honesty from you is heart warming .

I asked you to <put up or shut up > and apparently you realized that you were in wrong and chose to shut up.

You deserve credit for your honesty

<fredthebear: Here's some of what a troll looks like -- CGs has freely allowed this to go on and on and on>

What ? You calling me a troll ?

I will show you who troll is .

I am one of the most honest , detached/dispassionate, non partisan , objective poster who always posting with proofs and always raising the bar . My focus is always on learning - being a student and teacher simultaneously, educating and getting educated , always increasing my level every moment , every day as I progress towards reaching the level of jesus/krishna/buddha

And whenever you ready , I would show you that trolls on this site are <fredthebear> and his buddies.

Let me know whenever you are ready and I will oblige you, <ftb> .

Put up or shut up , <fredthebear>.

Regards

Jun-18-23  Rdb: <stone free or die: Archival footage: <This site has promoted itself as a strong supporter of Free Speech.

Let us note one of the main purposes of Free Speech is as follows:

<Criticism of government is at the very center of the constitutionally protected area of free discussion. Criticism of those responsible for government operations must be free, lest criticism of government itself be penalized.>

https://law.justia.com/constitution...

I suggest a reading of the above with <CG> substituted for "government".

As always, I strive to educate.>

chessgames.com chessforum (kibitz #40671)>

With due regards , <stone free or die> , whatever issues you have , they can be discussed in calm and friendly way .

Jun-18-23  Rdb: Part 2

I am very happy with the way team <petemcd85>/<stevemcd85>/<Susan freeman> are running this site and I think most of the users are very satisfied....

...And it pains me to see the kind of tone <stone free or die> and <fredthebear> take with admins and owner.

Jun-18-23  Rdb: Part 3

If I had not had privilege of learning from user <johnlspouge> (greatest teacher I have ever had ) , I would remain an idiot all my life , perhaps.

So , I am grateful to this site and <Daniel freeman>/<Susan freeman>

.

Jun-18-23  Rdb: If people have to criticize cg.com, it should be done in a calm , pleasant tone (or at least neutral tone)

It should not be like staunch opponents and staunch supporters of trump talking to each other .

That is what I think . Just saying.

Hey <diademas> , tell them how you and your wife had spoken to those people who had such different opinions from those of yours and yet you guys still had such a pleasant dinner together.. Such harmony . Your hallmark channel story had touched, moved , inspired so many people and some were even left teary eyed.

That is how we should disagree or criticize - with a sense of harmony and pleasantness.

Do I get amen ?
.

Jun-18-23  Rdb: <Susan freeman> <constant prediction of CG's demise is neither constructive...>

I am very happy with team <petemcd85>/<stevemcd85>/<Susan freeman> and I imagine so are most others.

So , obviously , I think future of cg.com is bright .

.

Jun-22-23  Rdb: Is there anyone who not happy with team <petemcd85>/<stevemcd87>/<Susan freeman> ? Show of hands please.

Not a single hand.

So , perhaps there are only two guys who keep complaining .

And now , perhaps , they too have stopped complaining . They too are satisfied now , it seems.

Conclusion : everybody is happy/satisfied with team <petemcd85>/<stevemcd87>/<Susan freeman>

.

Jun-23-23  Rdb: >fredthebear : The regulars realize that responding to this attention-seeking troll>

Here is the thing - I do not have time , inclination for never ending feud .

once again , <ftb> calling me <attention seeking troll > .

And when last time he called me troll and I challenged him that I would show that it is he and his buddies who are trolls and not me and he went silent for many days (or is it weeks)

And now he has resurfaced to call me <attention seeking troll > .once again

This guy never wants to resolve the issues- just like his buddy <big pawn>/<George wallace>

He always wants to have his way like a child - logic/fairness/honesty be damned.

I am done . I do not have time for this .

I got to leave this site at this point.

Once again , I have heartfelt gratitude for <Daniel freeman> and <Susan freeman> - I received so much from this site .

All the best to cg.com

Regards.

Jul-07-23  Deus Ex Alekhina: Where is Susan?
Jul-07-23
Premium Chessgames Member
  Susan Freeman: Here I am!
Jul-16-23
Premium Chessgames Member
  Susan Freeman: <Fred>
I hear your frustration,

but please understand that every time you blow the whistle will not result in a deletion.

Whistle blowing is not a command order to those in charge of the minutia of running CG. It is a suggestion.

That is at the sole discretion of the moderators.

Your contributions are appreciated, but please let those in charge do their jobs.

Jul-31-23  Rdb: Question : is pedophilia always harmful for a child ? Chatgpt : Yes, pedophilia is always harmful to a child. Pedophilia refers to an adult's sexual attraction to prepubescent children, which is illegal and morally unacceptable. Any form of sexual activity or exploitation involving a child is a grave violation of their rights and can have severe and lasting psychological, emotional, and physical consequences for the child.

Children are not capable of giving informed consent to engage in sexual activities with adults due to their lack of maturity and understanding of the potential risks involved. As such, any sexual contact between an adult and a child is considered abusive and harmful, and it is essential to protect children from such exploitation and abuse

Jul-31-23  Rdb: Part 2
Question : If a person says that pedophilia is not always harmful for a child , could that person be dangerous ?

Chatgpt : <Yes, if a person claims that pedophilia is not always harmful for a child, it raises serious concerns about their understanding of the issue and their potential to be dangerous. Such views are not only incorrect but also highly dangerous and harmful.

Pedophilia involves sexual attraction to prepubescent children, and any form of sexual contact between an adult and a child is considered abusive and harmful. Promoting or justifying such behavior is morally unacceptable and goes against legal and ethical standards that protect children from exploitation and abuse.

It is essential to prioritize the safety and well-being of children and take any statements or actions that normalize or defend pedophilia very seriously. If you encounter someone expressing such views, it is crucial to report it to the appropriate authorities immediately to ensure the protection of children from potential harm.

Jul-31-23  Rdb: Part 3
Chatgpt : Pedophilia is a psychiatric disorder characterized by an adult's sexual attraction to prepubescent children, typically under the age of 13. It is essential to note that pedophilia refers to the attraction itself and not necessarily to any specific actions or behaviors. Engaging in any form of sexual activity with a child is illegal and considered child abuse, regardless of the age of the child.

The exact age range for considering a child as prepubescent can vary, but generally, it refers to children who have not yet developed secondary sexual characteristics associated with puberty. The specific age can vary depending on the individual's physical development and can range from around 11 to 13 years old.

It is crucial to understand that pedophilia is a mental health disorder, and individuals struggling with this condition should seek professional help to manage their impulses and avoid any harm to children. Society must prioritize the protection of children and ensure their safety and well-being from potential predators

Jul-31-23  Rdb: Part 4
You guys listened to what chatgpt said .

So , guys , it is our moral duty to report <Al wazir> to authorities.

It is about objective moral values

Jul-31-23  Rdb: Part 5
Question : If someone anonymously claims on an american website that pedophilia is not harmful to a child , how can that person be reported to authorities ?

Chatgpt : If you come across content that promotes harmful or illegal activities, such as pedophilia, it's essential to report it to the appropriate authorities immediately. You can report it to the website's administrators using their reporting system, and also inform your local law enforcement or the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) in the United States. They handle such matters and can take appropriate action. Remember, reporting such content helps protect children and prevent harm

Jul-31-23  Rdb: Part 6

<Al wazir> has been claiming on this site in <rogoff forum > for last several years that <pedophilia does not always harmful the child> .

Owner/admins of cg.com must stop <Al waxir>.

Owner/admin must report <Al wazir> to authorities - owner/admins have emailid and other information of <Al wazir>

Jul-31-23  Rdb: Part 7

We also must keep in mind that while <Al wazir> has claimed that he is not a pedophile , he has never claimed that he is not a pimp for pedophiles

Also <al wazir> has claimed that <rape is natural> . <Al wazir> must be reported to authorities

.

Aug-01-23  Chesschronicle22: Isn't kinda controversial?
Aug-03-23  Rdb: At some point , I would request <beatgiant> and <johnlspouge> for help again , if they please .

I repeat once again whet I have repeated umpteen times already - when I joined this site many years ago , I was an idiot. If people of rogoff forum had not helped me , perhaps I would remain an idiot all my life . Especially <johnlspouge> - the best teacher I have ever had .

2) and therefore I feel very grateful to <Daniel freeman> and <Susan freeman> .

3) and now rogoff forum is better than ever thanks to team <Susan freeman>/<petemcd85>/<stevemcd87>

Very good team .

Aug-04-23  Rdb: Kudos to <keypusher> for keeping the moral compass of rogoff forum right.

Thanks a million to <keypusher> for that

.

Aug-05-23  virginmind: Hi! Can you please help with updating Bogdan Daniel Deac rating on his page here? Thanks.
Aug-05-23  Rdb: <keypusher: The indictment does a good job of putting January 6 in context -- not a standalone event but the last throw of a campaign to overturn the results of the election. Of course the campaign was feckless, disorganized, and incompetent, because the Defendant and his co-conspirators were feckless, disorganized and incompetent. But they were doing their best. When you read a quote about the "Elite Legal Strike Force" it would take a heart of stone to keep from laughing. But when Giuliani names two Georgia election workers at a hearing, and accuses them of "surreptitiously passing around USB ports like they are vials of heroin or cocaine" and the workers then receive numerous death threats (para 26), then it stops being funny. I'm in the choir on this, so to speak, so I'm curious what impact the indictment, which strikes me as pretty powerful, on those not in the choir. But they won't read it.

It's a curious convention in indictments to avoid referring to people by their names -- not just the Unnamed Co-Conspirators but the Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives and the Attorney General of Georgia, etc. I wish they'd change that custom.

No surprise, I think the hardest part of this case will be showing that Trump didn't believe his and the others' lies. The indictment tries to show he knew he was lying, but the quotes from Trump aren't as clearly self-incriminating as the ones from the documents case.>

<keypusher> said that he would read indictment over the weekend . Presumably , he read it thoroughly, deeply.

And now , he gave such an excellent review.

Thanks to <keypusher> for that .

2) there are stupid/nonsense posts in rogoff forum . And sometimes some people are like <rogoff forum does not have anything constructive , productive >

Not true .

Yes , there are nonsense/stupid posts in this forum But then there are some very constructive , productive , deep posts too.

So, overall , rogoff forum is very good , in my subjective opinion .

3) and now rogoff forum is almost perfect thanks to <Susan freeman>/<petemcd85>/<stevemcd87> team .

Very good team.

Aug-05-23
Premium Chessgames Member
  petemcd85: < virginmind: Hi! Can you please help with updating Bogdan Daniel Deac rating on his page here? Thanks. > Hello <virginmind> we are working on getting his rating updated, I will let you know once it's updated.
Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 49)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 33 OF 49 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC