I simply seconded <jnpope>'s complaint about members polluting the <Kash Patel> page with political diatribe (without even naming names) and <Fred> went off on me personally.

Look at all sfod's effortless trash posting on this page -- personal attacks with no information, no evidence, and no self-defense of repeated wrongs. Then the punk pretends to be taking the high road.

No, not the above. He crapped in the Bistro.

Shows his priority is to just sink up the environs. That includes the above.

Note that he seeks it out - I didn't slag him during his brief absence.

Speaking of absence - I usually check in during my many hiatuses, so don't tell me that Fred had a peaceful summer on <CG> during my absence.

FTB was harassed and insulted in the Bistro by z's dishonest boss in crime. Thus, FTB responded to correct pig's lies to set the record straight. BTW, stoned doez not own the Bistro as z thinks z doez. Notice, z pretended to complain but did not bother to post the Bistro link as usual because the truth hurts. z does not want the truth repeated here, because the truth alwayz makes z look bad.

No surprise that stone scree and lie is trolling FTB all over the internet again tonight. Posting falsehoods on this page alone will not suffice for that internet hoodlum.

sfod is lying about this summer again too. Well, sfod is lying again as usual. Lying is stone's creed no matter what time of year. Even a fool knows that sfod is unable "to check in" without posting half-a-dozen times on one page; z in incapable of shutting up.

Why does z's useless trash get to remain everywhere all over this website? Flush the toilet once in a while.

<fredthebear> posts two kind of posts - (i) cryptic posts like these and

(ii) chess related posts. One of his chess related posts I liked very much . Here is that :

<Feb -01-25
fredthebear: Puzzling as to why Black did not play 23...KxBg8 >

My response :

<rdb : < fredthebear: Puzzling as to why Black did not play 23...KxBg8>

23....kXBg8
24 g4 QXg4
25 NXh6+ forks and wins queen>

That offense damn well deserved an EXPLANATION!! It was a major offense showing that somebody in charge did NOT do their job.

S Erenburg vs E Rosen, 2024 (kibitz #25)

No, the scornful cyberbully post remains, but the replies were deleted!! That's an unethical stinking pile of bunk by a lowball monitor. This silent waylaying of member posts has happened 50,000+ times on this website on behalf of the same few troublemakers. perfidubious' never-ending derogatory remarks against thousands of members are allowed to stand while his vulture pal conveniently erases the boisterous opposition. The squelching of members' freedom of speech, one's right to defend themselves -- the deliberate murdered disappearance of the TRUTH by Al's fellow jackass in word crime -- is a long, deep and shameful black mark on this website.

I hope <fredthebear> is not puzzled any more.

I was pained to see that nobody was answering his question , nobody was helping him , so I decided to help him this once and answered his question.

<gezafan> has been spreading this misinformation/disinformation for years now .

<gezafan> , why you have listed only 15 cases - not all of them hate crime , not all of them crimein america , some crimes as old as six years . Every years around 6000 hate crimes based on race, ethnicity , ancestry are reported in america and they are listed in Government site whose link I posted . 6000 hate crime every year and hate crimes listed for current year as well as previous year.

https://www.justice.gov/hatecrimes/...

List all you want , idiot , just do not give incorrect , stupid interpretation - correct interpretation is that only around 15 percent hate crime against white , around 85 percent against non white .

<
Among hate crime offenses motivated by race, ethnicity, and ancestry, 48.4% were composed of anti-Black bias, 15.8% were of anti-White bias, 14.1% were of anti-Hispanic or Latino bias, and 4.3% were of anti-Asian bias>

Your claim is not true , <diceman>

<in the hours after the public release of the redacted report from special counsel Robert S. Mueller, President Donald Trump took to Twitter with a message that reads, in part, “NO OBSTRUCTION!”

That’s not at all what the Mueller report says, though.>

https://www.factcheck.org/2019/04/w...

While the report outlined several instances where President Trump's actions could potentially be seen as obstructive, it stopped short of making a definitive conclusion. This was partly because of a long-standing Justice Department policy that prohibits indicting a sitting president, as outlined by the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC). The reasoning behind this policy is that criminal charges against a sitting president could interfere with their ability to govern effectively.

Response: Mueller found at least four acts by Trump in which all elements of the obstruction statute were satisfied >

<gezafan> , in america most of the violent crimes are committed by white people.

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u....

So , you should change your assertion like this , perhaps <in america , white people are committing violent crimes all over and no one cares >

If you look at the crime outside america , it is even worse in some places .

In poland , for example , more than 90 percent violent crimes are committed by white people .

So , <gezafan> , your assertion should be like <white people are committing violent crimes all over and no one cares > .