I tend to believe he should have fully recovered by now.

<Count Wedgemore: Me too, <Keyser> I'm kind of warming up a little to <Sargon> now..>

Hahaha

Hey guys , i love Trump too. :)

What do you think of me now ?

Hahaha :)

Yes, I agree to that. Only that he did not succeed, but ended up with a bunch of trumpers he could not handle.>

The worst party, by far, JUDGING BY MULTIPLE ACCOUNT DELETIONS, is a Trump hater and regularly posts to that effect.

Your post simply ignores this reality.

Also, did you ever consider that DF could handle Trump supporters just fine, thank you very much?

You're backing the wrong team - <OCF> and his crew doesn't represent the "good" guys.>

You are in no way equipped to judge "good" and "bad".

<Just check out <thegoodneega/thegoodneeger> episode,>

Okay, I see now. PC snowflake can't stand edgy humor.

So let's try sober wisdom instead:

"Judge not, lest ye be judged."

<And consider the flack an otherwise uninvolved <CG> member took just for helping me find those old posts.>

So he got called out for helping you in your attempt to suppress free speech. This is not "flack", this is called "accountability".

If someone comes to my forum bragging about how they are in favor of free speech and against banning, and then contradicts this claim through ACTIONS (which speak louder than words), then the person should expect to be held accountable for the discrepancy between his assertion and his action.

<Anyways, a sorry racist chapter with basically the same crew as those complaining the loudest today about being "misunderstood".>

Um, you don't know what racism is, obviously. Just because you operate under a misconception doesn't mean the rest of us should stick our heads up our butts the way you have.

<PS- Did you review the <thegoodneega> episode I cited - in the interest of fairness and all that.>

Thank you , sir.

Finally, you are lightening up :)

Respect for that.

1. I did not brag about anything. I supported something you had done.

2. I showed someone a search result. The purpose was not to get anyone banned. It was, really, <nothing>. Even your hero, <BP>, agreed with me that it was nothing.

3. Because of that <nothing> you launched a hysterical attack on me in your forum, in my forum, and in yet another forum (BP's).

4. Then you put me on ignore, to stop me from defending myself in your forum against your idiotic allegations. You also deleted a number of my posts, like a true champion of free speech.

But reading some messages from this forum I now understand why Euro cup games are missing from the DB - the admins have much more important stuff to do like banning users, picking up public quarrels with kibitzers (<OCF> of all people? Really?) and proudly declaring their political affiliation. Who needs chess games with all this fun, right?

Oh boo hoo. Are you going to cry now?

When a person jumps into a political or a religious discussion, on line or IRL, they should know that it can get heated.

It's not like it hasn't happened the other way, with multiple Leftists or Atheists ganging up on a lone Trumper or Christian or what have you.

And not just on cg.com either! All day, every day, all around the www!

And look, I went through the same thing you went through, <Tab>. I was upset and faced a sort of crisis in my life, when confronted with the fact that, without objectivity, my Leftist world view morality was no better than the worst kind of depravity.

Only, it wasn't other kibitzers - it was from myself! When I tried to establish logical underpinnings for the atheist world view I intended to adopt, my own reasoning faculties gave me the refutation. That was about 16~17 years ago.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/...

What about other potential CG customers around the world? There are many gays, atheists, muslims, latinos, mormons, jews, catholics and (dare I say) women who could pay membership. Plus that the Trump type conservatism is not very popular outside the US. Perhaps hiding things away in the Rogoff forum is not enough to make <them> feel welcome?