chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Robert Eugene Byrne vs Robert James Fischer
"The Brilliancy Prize" (game of the day Mar-09-2017)
US Championship (1963/64), New York, NY USA, rd 3, Dec-18
King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation. Immediate Fianchetto (E60)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 144 times; par: 30 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 10 more Robert E Byrne/Fischer games
sac: 15...Nxf2 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 22 OF 22 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-06-17  The Kings Domain: Poor Byrne brothers, the whipping boys of ol' Bobby.

Fischer's smooth escalating type of victory is perhaps unmatched in the game. His brilliancies are usually simple but there's a magic to them that can be awe-inspiring.

Jul-06-17  Petrosianic: <The Kings Domain: Poor Byrne brothers, the whipping boys of ol' Bobby.>

Actually, Robert was maybe Bobby's toughest US opponent after Reshevsky. You need to study more than just one game.

Sep-02-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Video analysis of this game: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHy....
Jan-13-18  CheckMateEndsTheGame: On move 14. Why not just play f3?
Jan-14-18  GT3RS: Fischer was built in a lab.

A brilliant and underrated short game. Bryne made no obvious error leading up to the fatal queen move or should I say rook move.

From what I've read there was a lengthy analytic artillery exchange via articles in chess publications afterward as Soviet analysts sought to diminish the result by showing Bryne's win with the other move and Fischer responding with analysis to show a plausible draw.

Jan-15-18  Petrosianic: <GT3RS: Fischer was built in a lab.

A brilliant and underrated short game.>

Underrated? You've got to be kidding me, Pyle. This is the one that everyone raves about.

Jan-22-18  scottpi: Why Didn't Byrne play 21. Nf3? What was Fischer's reply to that?
Jan-22-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: <scottpi: Why Didn't Byrne play 21. Nf3? What was Fischer's reply to that?>

Fischer was planning to take the cyanide pill in his signet ring if white played 21. Nf3.

Either that or Bxf3+ 22. Kxf3 Qf6+ followed by Qxc3. That only wins back the piece and leaves Fischer a pawn up, so there's probably better, but I don't see it.

Jan-22-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gregor Samsa Mendel: <scottpi: Why Didn't Byrne play 21. Nf3? What was Fischer's reply to that?>

21..Qxd2+ 22 Rxd2 Bxc3 and black will be up the exchange and a pawn.

Jan-23-18  Granny O Doul: And winning more material still with ...Re3 coming up after gathering the exchange.
Jan-23-18  Howard: Yes, Fischer could hardly have overlooked 21.Nf3 in his calculations. You just "know" that that move would not have worked for White or even come close---otherwise, Fischer would have acknowledged the move in his book.
Jan-30-18  yurikvelo: https://pastebin.com/kqfHg5Qt

multiPV

Feb-09-18  Artemio: It's a Gruenfeld similar to his game with the other Byrne (Donald)...
Apr-13-18  Justin796: There's a Herbert James Fischer in the 1700s who supposedly won every game with the black pieces, and never won with the White pieces except on Wednesday, 1776!
May-26-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Has anyone ever seen this game annotated anywhere without the final quip about the grandmasters in the other room?
May-26-18  Retireborn: <offramp> I don't think I even know who these two(?) grandmasters were, although I have seen Rossolimo named as one.
May-26-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <This dazzling move came as the shocker... the culminating combination is of such depth that, even at the very moment at which I resigned, both grandmasters who were commenting on the play for the spectators in a separate room believed I had a won game! -- Robert Byrne>

The commentators were not Fischer or Robert Byrne. I suppose it was Reshevsky and Kashdan... what other US grandmasters were there?

And how many spectators were there? December 18th, 1963 in New York's deep midwinter - who would come along to see a chess game?

I would imagine a dozen or so spectators and two chess masters, and the masters are being paid five nickels an hour, and the spectators aren't sure how knights move....

May-26-18  Howard: Soltis mentions who those other two grandmasters/commenters were, and I do recall that one of them was indeed Rossolimo. But I'll be darned if I can recall the other one. Just consult that book, though.
May-26-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Soltis only names Rossolimo as does The Chess Review from February. Other sources. The Mammoth Book of Chess and Wade and O'Connell's book only refer to the analysts as other 'Grandmasters.'.

And how many spectators were there?

Chess Review say 200+ turned up for the Fischer - Reshevsky game and more than that for Round 7 game Fischer v Addison.

May-26-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I can imagine those 200 spectators.

Half of them dressed in Fischer's away kit, and the Reshevskyites dressed as accountants.

Fireworks being sporadically let off. Guys urinating in the guy in front's pocket. Vuvuzelas blasting Fischer's eardrums.

And then, during long pauses in the game, the dreaded Mexican Wave.

Nov-05-18  PJs Studio: This game was an amazing inspiration to me as a youngster. Fischer’s 18...Nxg2!! was the first glimps I had at the depths of calculation needed to win chess games against experts and masters. One of the greatest combos in history.

The only real question about this game... does 18...Ng2 deserve two exclamation marks, or three?

Nov-30-18  mikealando: In response to earlier queries <why didn't white play 21.Nf3?> Answer: 21.Nf3 leaves white a piece down after 21...Qxd2+ 22.Rxd2 Bxc3 23.Rad1 Bxd2 24.Rxd2 Re3 25.Rf2 Rd8 26.Bc1 Rc3 27.Bg5 Rdd3 and the knight will go. Did Fischer see this far? I'm sure he did, and so did Byrne.
Nov-30-18  PJs Studio: As to the GM’s in the other room commenting on the game? David Levy in his book “How Fischer Plays Chess” points out that Byrne thought there were GMs commentating on the game but they were US senior masters.

The masters did claim it was “madness” for Byrne to resign. Levy also pointed out that Byrne thought for a long time before resigning. Byrne was a great player in those days. He knew full well he had run into a buzzsaw.

Dec-01-18  Howard: Rossolimo was one of the commentators, according to Soltis.
Jun-25-19  Patzer Natmas: Game featured in "New in Chess - Tactics Training - Bobby Fischer"

Solve for black on move 19...

19...d4! 20.♘xd4 ♗b7+ 20...♗b7+ 21.♔f1 (21.♔g1 ♗xd4+ 22.♕xd4 ♖e1+! 23.♔f2 ♕xd4+ 24.♖xd4 ♖xa1 Black wins; 21.♔f2 ♕d7! 22.♖ac1 ♕h3 23.♘f3 ♗h6 24.♕d3 ♗e3+ 25.♕xe3 ♖xe3 26.♔xe3 ♖e8+ 27.♔f2 ♕f5! ) 21...♕d7 and White resigned because of (21...♕c8 is also good. ) 22.♕f2 (22.♘db5 ♕h3+ 23.♔g1 ♗h6 Black wins ) 22...♕h3+ 23.♔g1 ♖e1+!! 24.♖xe1 ♗xd4 Black wins 25.♕xd4 (25.♖e2 ♕g2# ) 25...♕g2# --> as per the text

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 22)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 22 OF 22 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Brilliant attacks
by Jaredfchess
IPlayGood's favorite games
by IPlayGood
Pravitel's favorite games
by Pravitel
Two Diagonals
from Positional Chess Handbook II by Retarf
Byrne-Fischer
by jojoetpascal
3. Robert Fischer
by Roshon N
Crushing
from Chess would not be chess without these games by Mating Net
Fischer with his Kings Indian.
from Kryptops' favorite games by Kryptops
Absentee's favorite games
by Absentee
The Brillancy Prize
from Top Ten of All Time by pcmvtal
!! GAME aaa // -- EVANS GAMB -- //
by wwm
Capacorn's favorite games
by Capacorn
12. ... e5!?, 15. ... Nxf2!, 18. ... Nxg2!!, 21. ... Qd7!
from Necessary Truths' favorite games by Necessary Truths
c10 143
from Modern Art of Attack Game Collection by takchess
Gruenfeld Games
by Zhbugnoimt
Game 544
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 2 by Chessdreamer
My Great Predecessors by Garry Kasparov
by LionHeart40
12... e5! in a highly symmetrical Indian position
from Great games by (past, present and future) WC's by Marvol
une007's favorite games
by une007
PaulLovric's favorite games
by PaulLovric
plus 556 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC