chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Boris Spassky vs Robert James Fischer
"The Final Curtain" (game of the day Mar-10-2006)
Fischer - Spassky World Championship Match (1972), Reykjavik ISL, rd 21, Aug-31
Sicilian Defense: Paulsen Variation (B46)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 51 times; par: 71 [what's this?]

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 55 more Spassky/Fischer games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can see a list of all games that they have seen recently at their Game History Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-11-15  A.T PhoneHome: Yes but at that point (Fischer was leading 6-3 in wins) Spassky may have not thought of playing two draws while one decisive game could decide the outcome, which isn't to say he played for the win here just so Fischer could beat him.

However, considering that the last decisive game had been Game 13 I think Spassky wanted to go for the decision here. Of course I don't know that but it must have been a very exhausting match and instead of two draws, one decision may have seemed a better solution (at that time). And Spassky might have won, making the score 6-4, with 11 draws, certainly worth more fighting for.

Apr-11-15  Howard: I believe you mean Spassky would have had to play THREE draws, not two.

In other words, if Game 21 had ended in a draw, than Spassky would have had to win all three of the remaining games in a row to achieve a tie score.

And Fischer would have had White in two of those games.

Apr-11-15  A.T PhoneHome: My phrasing of the statement was a bit off, sorry <Howard>.

What I meant was that after Game 20 it was Fischer 11.5 - 8.5 Spassky, Fischer being one point away from the title so Spassky may have wanted to push for the win in Game 21, rejecting a possible draw; going for the "make or break" tactic.

That is what I meant with wanting to avoid two draws (two draws would give Fischer 12.5 points, enough to win the World Championship).

Apr-12-15  RookFile: All this is no doubt interesting, but the only question on move 30 is whether black will win or whether it's a draw. The ship where Spassky could win this game had already sailed and surely Spassky did not have any illusions about <winning> this game with 30. g4. He just overlooked Fischer's ...f5!
Apr-12-15  A.T PhoneHome: <RookFile> I guess my statements "went past" of what you intended, sorry for that. It was my fault for not finding out the <only possible outcomes after move 30> in advance, which would have saved me the trouble of posting as much as I did. :P

But I maintain (fallaciously or not) that Spassky wasn't looking for points from this game since this game had the potential of deciding this whole match.

Not saying Spassky wanted Black to win; just that he must have been tired after such an enduring match and thus, didn't want to play two games or more.

Apr-12-15  Howard: Spassky actually may have harbored some hopes of winning this game, because, after all, he made a speculative exchange surprise here. In other words, he knew darn well that a draw was almost the same thing as a loss, at this late stage.
Apr-12-15  A.T PhoneHome: I agree because one of those games between 21-24 was going to be the one to decide the World Champion. So why not Game 21 immediately? But <theoretically> this wasn't to be winning for Spassky after move 30 as <RookFile> here said.

One can understand Spassky; as I stated above Spassky may have tried "win it or bin it" approach here. (emphasis on the word "may" since I wasn't there and I am not Spassky to say what he thought back then)

Oct-09-15  keithbc: modern engines now prove that Fischer could have won easier by taking the f2 pawn 27.... Rxf2!
Sep-06-16  RookFile: Do they indeed. How does it go? 28....Rxf2 28. a5 Rb2 29. Kg3 Kf8 30. a6 Ke7 31. Kf3 Kd6 32. Bxf7

Something like this. I'm not seeing how black wins.

Sep-28-16  edubueno: 10 Bf5! is a very clever suggestion.As an example: 10...Nxd4?!; 11 Bxc8 - Nxc2; 12 Bxb7 - Nxa1; 13 Bc6+ - Nd7; 14 Qxd5 and white should win.
Sep-28-16  edubueno: 10 Nxc6 is an inaccurate plan.
Sep-28-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: <A.T PhoneHome: Game 21 of Fischer-Spassky (1972) match in progress:>

I've seen so many photos labeled wrong.
Do we really know that's Game 21?

Sep-29-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <diceman>

I suspect it is from game #1, as this picture apparently is.

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/4XDqL6R1GJk/...

Wouldn't Spassky's chair be different?

Sep-29-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: <keypusher: <diceman>

I suspect it is from game #1, as this picture apparently is.>

Well this is Game 1 video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5r...

Spassky's chair looks beige,
Fischer's suit looks blue.
(vs dark maroon)

Of course, I know this one is true because I can see the pcs.

That increases the probablity by one black Game that it's not game 1, and "possibly" Game 21.

By the way, it's funny how Spassky lazily tips the King and slides it over to trap the Bishop.

Sep-29-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Well this is Game 1 video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5r...

Spassky's chair looks beige,
Fischer's suit looks blue.
(vs dark maroon)>

thanks, i stand corrected.

Sep-29-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Flemming: Steinitz vs Zukertort, 1886

The position after 10th move is almost identical to 2nd game of WTM Steinitz vs. Zukertort 1886.

Oct-16-16  ZonszeinP: Hello,
Game which black also won
And which probably Fischer knew
May-05-17  Helios727: What happens after 41. Bd7 Kg4 42. Bc6 Kxf5 43. Kg3 ?
Dec-06-17  Howard: As I recall, Timman stated in a late-2001 issue of NIC that Spassky would have drawn if he'd sealed 41.Kh3, plus he also pointed out a mistake that Fischer had made 1-2 moves earlier which would have given him the win. Remind me to dig up that issue tonight--I'm not home right now.

At any rate, fans will recall that at the closing banquet, Fischer had told Spassky that the adjourned position was completely lost for Spassky regardless of what move he'd sealed. Looks like Bobby was wrong on that one!

Dec-07-17  Howard: Yes, Timman stated that 41.Kh3 WOULD have drawn.
Dec-15-17  GT3RS: Black is +1.91 in the final position. He might have won or at least drawn. Pretty sure if it was Fischer playing black he would've continued playing.
Dec-15-17  GT3RS: On another note: This game is fascinating to be honest. Fischer had black in Game 1 like Spassky in this game.

Spassky played 20.Bxh2 (the move Fischer played in Game 1 - one of the reasons he lost).

In this game the move equalizes white's slightly inferior position. In the end he ends up losing.

Great ending to the match.

Dec-19-17  Clement Fraud: This is one of the games that makes me suspicious about Spassky's motivations - ie., whether or not he truly wanted to retain his title against Fischer in '72: 10.Nxc6 is a move that most proficient club players would reject. It was Fischer himself who demonstrated (in the year prior to this) how to tackle black's center in this line of the Paulsen... and he gave Petrosian a beating in the process! Fischer vs Petrosian, 1971
Dec-19-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Clement Fraud> This game and Fischer-Petrosian diverged on move 5, so I have no idea what you mean by "this line of the Paulsen" -- the openings are completely different. And Fischer's 5.Bd3 and Spassky's 5.Nc3 appear to be about equally popular, so <if Fischer demonstrated...how to tackle Black's center> the lesson didn't take.

On the black side, neither Petrosian's nor Fischer's continuations seem to have found much support.

Dec-19-17  Clement Fraud: A good very good evening,
I was referring to the concept of swapping Knight's in a way that strengthens black's center: The way that Fischer did this (as white against Petrosian in 71) turned out well as he hadn't yet developed his QN to c3 (thus having ready his c pawn to take control at c4 - which completely neutralized Petrosian's greater number of center pawns). In this game, Spassky's swap of Knight's merely removed black's only structural weakness - his isolated QP.

Perhaps I was lax in referring to both games as being the Paulsen variation - but the Taimanov, Kan & Paulsen variations very often transpose into each other after ten or so moves.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 6)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Sicilian Defense: Paulsen Variation
from FISCHER GAMES by gambitfan
Bortron's favorite games
by Bortron
The Final Curtain
from Fischer Favorites by Micah Tuhy by micahtuhy
Fischer vs the World Champions Decisive Games
by visayanbraindoctor
Game 21
from Fischer World Champion (Timman/Euwe) by Qindarka
Game #21
from The Fischer-Spassky Reykjavik 1972 match by dac1990
Sicilian Kan : Black Wins
by ISeth
Balcacer's - Fisher
by Balcacer
Sicilian Defense: Paulsen (B46) 0-1 Game 21, The Final Curtain
from Sicilian Taimanov / Paulsen Poked Fredthebear by fredthebear
Spassky vs the World Champions Decisive Games
by visayanbraindoctor
grellas' Fischer Sicilian games
by grellas
confirms Fisher's superiority, at last he was world champion!
from sleeplessknight1's favorite games by sleeplessknight1
Lesson 16
from Unbeatable Chess Lessons by ganine1947
Lesson 16
from Unbeatable Chess Lessons Compiled by ganine1947 by fredthebear
Round 21
from WCC Index [Fischer-Spassky 1972] by Hesam7
Fisher vs. Spassky 1972 Championship
by Pianoplayer
vonKrolock's favorite games
by vonKrolock
StuporMoundi's favorite games
by StuporMoundi
March 10: The Final Curtain
from Game of the Day 2006 by Phony Benoni
fisher games
by nadvil
plus 58 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC