chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Mikhail Botvinnik vs Tigran Vartanovich Petrosian
Botvinnik - Petrosian World Championship Match (1963), Moscow URS, rd 4, Mar-30
English Opening: Symmetrical. Two Knights Variation (A35)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 30 more Botvinnik/Petrosian games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you missed a Game of the Day, you can review the last year of games at our Game of the Day Archive.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-04-08  Knight13: Haha both players messing around with their dark-squared bishops.

11...Ne7 12. Qb4.

Jul-16-09  nymsso: I think both players are playing positionally so the games results in somewhat drawish endgame type of games...
Dec-27-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: A crucial game. Petrosian was well aware that Botvinnik began many of his matches with a huge burst, +3 =1 being a common score after 4 games. Botvinnik had won the first game as black, had a strong initiative as white in game 2 (Botvinnik vs Petrosian, 1963), drawn without too many scares in game 3 and now played this game 4.

This game ended up as a huge disappointment for MB.

He plays 8.Qb3...


click for larger view

and black takes the knight on c3. However, Botvinnik does not recapture. He has prepared a very good novelty: 9.Bf1-c4!


click for larger view

Petrosian now shows why and how he was a defensive genius. He plays all the right moves. After 10.b2xc3, Botvinnik had expected 10...Na5.


click for larger view

MB says he would now have played 11.Bb5+ Bd7 12.Qa4 Nc6 13.d5!! exd5 14.0-0 <with a strong attack>:


click for larger view

What do you think?

Botvinnik is perturbed by Petrosian's unexpected defence. Was he wondering if there had been a spy watching his home analysis? He repeats moves and we come to this position:


click for larger view

Black has only one piece in play. Surely a player like Tal would knock over the black position pretty quickly? Yes, he would! Tal vs H Pohla, 1972 where Tal played 12.0-0. Simple!

Mar-10-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  zydeco: Botvinnik thinks he could have held on to an advantage with 17.Bxc6 Bxc6 18.Ne5 Qd5 19.f3
Mar-10-14  RookFile: offramp is right that the position screams for 12. 0-0.
Mar-10-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <offramp: Botvinnik is perturbed by Petrosian's unexpected defence. Was he wondering if there had been a spy watching his home analysis?>

Paranoia will destroy ya.

Mar-10-14  Petrosianic: Yeah, but in this case, it's offramp's paranoia, rather than Botvinnik's.
Apr-21-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <Petrosianic: Yeah, but in this case, it's offramp's paranoia, rather than Botvinnik's.> I don't think anyone <was> passing on information about Botvinnik's opening preparation - but Botvinnik might have thought that someone was.

But Botvinnik's preparation was not really very good. Tal found a better continuation (12.0-0) - it doesn't look too hard to find, but Botvinnik missed it. Mind you, Pohla did not play very well, but at least Tal set him more difficult problems.

I thought it was a fact that Botvinnik distrusted some of his assistants during these championship matches.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Match Botvinnik!
by chessgain
Match Botvinnik!
by amadeus
World Championship Game #4
from Road to the Championship - Tigran Petrosian by suenteus po 147
Game 4, Botvinnik leads 2 1/2-1 1/2
from 1963 World Chess Championship by Penguincw
51b Middlegames - White's Hanging Pawns
by whiteshark
World Championship Game #4
from WCC Index [Botvinnik-Petrosian 1963] by Suenteus Po
Match Petrosian!
by amadeus


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC