chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Emanuel Lasker vs William Ewart Napier
"Pawnslaught" (game of the day Apr-19-2016)
Cambridge Springs (1904), Cambridge Springs, PA USA, rd 3, Apr-28
Sicilian Defense: Closed Variation. Traditional (B25)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 84 times; par: 46 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 1,236 more games of Lasker
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Help with kibitzing features can be found on our Kibtizing Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-06-14  rosenthal: Why did Black resign? What does White play in reply to Bf8?
Oct-06-14  sneaky pete: After 35... Bf8 I would prefer 36.Bd4+ Bg7 37.g6 ..


click for larger view

36.Ng6+ .. doesn't look so good if Black finds the defence 36... Rxg6.

Oct-06-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <sneaky pete> Oops! My suggestion was stupid.

I better have some coffee.

Plus I deleted my embarrassing post.

Never post before coffee.

Feb-10-16  morfishine: One of my favorite games
Apr-19-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Well, I suppose I should just be glad this game finally made GOTD. There has been a tendency, especially in the Silicon Ascendancy, to denigrate it for unsoundness and inaccurary.

Big Fat Hairy Deal. When the loser proudly calls it his best game, you've got something special.

I suppose I'm a little bitter about the pun, having submitted a couple which seemed clever to me but obviously didn't impress others. But <Pawnslaught> just isn't right. If ever there was a game where the pieces dominated, this is it.

Apr-19-16  AlicesKnight: Indeed a fascinating game. In the light of the man/machine discussion, I like Capablanca's comment (quoted by Golombek from Nikolai Grekov); "Let us depart from science... Chess can never reach its height by following in the path of science... Let us therefore ... turn the struggle of technique into a battle of ideas".
Apr-19-16  Ratt Boy: Excellent game; butt it is not a Closed Sicilian. It is a Dragon.
Apr-19-16  morfishine: <Phony Benoni> is absolutely correct: The excellence of this game is counterbalanced by the blatant inaccuracy of the game title

<CG> should erase this one; there are dozens of great games that highlight the pawnslaught theme

This isn't one of them

*****

Apr-19-16  Ironmanth: Wow. Over morning coffee, at first this game did not make great sense. Probably much deeper than I can understand. I have a lot of questions on piece maneuvering. Thus, much to learn here. As far as the puns are concerned, sadly I have given up even looking at them anymore. Still love this sight and the many wonderful, intuitive, and helpful reader commentaries and analysis. Keep it up, chess players!
Apr-19-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Bad title: the pawnslaught involves at least two or three passed pawns taking over the game.
Apr-19-16  Howard: Nothing against this game's being GOTD, but Soltis stated in his book from ten years ago of the 100 best games of the 20th century, that this game was one of the most OVERRATED games of that century.

He argued that the game "(didn't) stand up well to close scrutiny." In other words, over the years several mistakes were gradually discovered in this game.

Apr-19-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: If mistakes hadn't been found in this game, we would doubt its authenticity.
Apr-19-16  Twocolors: I have learned so much from my mistakes, I seriously consider making a few more...
Apr-19-16  erimiro1: Sometimes I judge games simply by counting how many "what????" moves were done. "what????" moves can be great or bad (I don't mean tragic mistakes) but in all cases, they are unexpected and products of brilliant ideas. This game includes many "What????" moves, that are not easy to refute OTB, and this is the right way to see it.
Apr-19-16  newzild: A mind-boggling game.

After reading back through the comments there was a lot of discussion 10 years ago about various moves, backed up by computer analysis.

Of course, computers are much stronger now, so I've updated some evaluations using the latest version of Stockfish, running on my specced-out Macbook Pro:

9...Nh5 (slight advantage Black) is 0.3 better than the passive 9...Ne8 (equal).

13...exf4! (-0.4) is a big improvement for Black over 13...Nd4 (+0.7). This move has not been mentioned by other commentators.

18. f5 is stronger than 18. h5, but only slightly (.02)

Apr-19-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: Yes, the game has nothing to do with a pawn storm, at least not a major one, so the name "Pawnslaught" seems inappropriate. Now, Napier thought that this was the best game he ever played even though he lost it. So perhaps a more suitable title might be along the lines of "Best Game I Ever Lost".
Apr-19-16  newzild: 19. f5! would have been good (+0.5), as it keeps the file closed over White's king. Lasker's 19. Bc5 is equal.

Black failed to exploit White's 19th. Napier should have opened the file and pinned the Ne7 with 19....ef (equal) instead of 19...gh (+1).

20. Bc4 (-1.6) was a blunder. Lasker should have played 20. bc, which is equal.

However, Napier blundered in turn with 20...ef (+0.8) instead of the equal 20...Ne4.

Napier also erred with 21...Ne4 instead of 21...Be4, after which he was probably lost (+1.4)

There are a couple of inaccuracies towards the end of the game. Basically, Black shouldn't have moved his rook off the back rank, and White could have played his 35. Be3 mating idea a move earlier. However, Black never had the chance to be better than -2.0 (in other words, lost) so the inaccuracies weren't terribly important.

In all, a pretty good performance by both players considering how complicated this game was.

Apr-19-16  morfishine: Napier was first and foremost, a businessman. But he played a pretty mean game of chess
Feb-21-17  JohnBoy: <newzild> - I don't get it. How can 20.Bc4 evaluate at -1.6 and black's best is 20...Ne4 w equality?
Jul-20-17  The Kings Domain: The very definition of "all over the place".
Dec-02-17  Ulhumbrus: On 8 g4 suppose that Black plays 8...d5. Then on 9 g5 Nxe4 has become possible.
May-20-18  Saniyat24: Lasker started the attack by thrusting his pawns on the kingside... <morfishine> yes Napier played some pretty sleek chess...this game won a brilliancy prize... W Napier vs Chigorin, 1902
Dec-02-18  RookFile: That's Lasker for you. He's in serious trouble, some guy is playing the game of his life against him.... and he wins anyway.
Dec-08-18  EmanuelLasker: Well said, <RookFile>! Just so.
Dec-08-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  wtpy: I think 19 hg6 has to be considered an improvement as well.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 5)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
9
from 125 Greatest Chess Games by mattgumm
(23) Battles Royal of the Chessboard by R.N. Coles
from KP Big Rock's KP hit Fredthebear by fredthebear
Game 3, 50 Great Games of Chess by Harry Golombek
from yPublished Games by Year and Unconfirmed Source by fredthebear
Best Chess Games of All Time
by Timothy Glenn Forney
Round Three, April 28th
from Cambridge Springs 1904 by JoseTigranTalFischer
Edeltalent's favorite games
by Edeltalent
June, p. 7 [Game 30]
from American Chess Bulletin 1904 by Phony Benoni
40
from Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by keypusher
13* the loser, Napier, rated this his best-ever game.
from notable Chess games by DanBoyle
How Lasker crush the dragon
from 20122234's favorite world champions games by 20122234
A Tactical Delight !
from The Capabilities Of The Human Mind by metamorphysis
Timeless Classic
from andrewjsacks' Games of Note by andrewjsacks
Sicilian Defense: Closed Variation. Traditional
from MKD's Sicilian Defense White by Patca63
!
from lasker best games by brager
Game 25
from Masters of the Chessboard (Reti) by Qindarka
assorted Good games
by rbaglini
brainiac9129's favorite games
by brainiac9129
lasker napier game 26
from Richard Reti's Masters of the Chessboard games by teorems
lasker 1
from emilio's favorite games, 2 by emilio martinez


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC