Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Pal Benko vs Robert James Fischer
"Hungary for a Win" (game of the day Sep-02-2014)
Curacao Candidates (1962), Willemstad CUW, rd 1, May-02
Pirc Defense: General (B07)  ·  1-0


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 15 times; par: 72 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 18 more Benko/Fischer games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can learn a lot about this site (and chess in general) by reading the Chessgames Help Page. If you need help with premium features, please see the Premium Membership Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-02-04  morphyvsfischer: Black should have played 8 ...a5 so he wouldn't be so bottled up.
Feb-23-05  Whitehat1963: Before Fischer was FISCHER.
Feb-23-05  aw1988: I don't know... 8...a5 looks rather ugly.
Feb-17-06  blingice: Was this Fischer's loss because of the two pawns?
Apr-03-06  ycensor: OK, let's all compare this with
Speelman-Williams from ENG 1974:

After 8 a4 in that game, Williams
played ...A5!

Apr-03-06  ycensor: And it is amazing what one tiny
little move placement can do.
Jun-26-06  tonsillolith: If black had played 8...a5, how could white have taken advantage of the ugly move?
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: For some reason, my software says this should be B07 Pirc defence.
Jun-26-06  RookFile: I think 8.... a5 looks pretty good, maybe at some point black will entertain parachuting his knight to b4.
Jun-26-06  RookFile: Wanna be: it's pretty funny, if Benko had played d3 instead of d4, it would be like BOTH sides are playing the Pirc defense.
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <8... Nbd7>
Yes, Virginia, at the higher level of master play, apparently insignificant opening inaccuracies can take on gigantic proportions.
Jul-14-07  RookFile: Benko of course was deeply familiar with the normal King's Indian for white (and had even beaten Fischer previously in his career with this). Going into this game, I think Benko had a scheme that would essentially lead to an improved variation of this for white, and take Fischer away from the stuff that he normally liked to do.

Profound stuff.

Jul-16-07  simondt: Isn't this opening named after the man himself and called Benkö's opening?
Jul-16-07  Petrosianic: Yeah, that's the way it's listed in Horowitz's "Chess Openings: Theory and Practice". Never heard it called Hungarian Opening before, though I've occasionally seen it lumped as a King's Indian Attack or somethign.

Mednis' notes to this game in "How to Beat Bobby Fischer" are solid gold. If you have a copy, check his discussion on the similarities and dissimilarites of this variation to the long variation of the King's Indian.

Premium Chessgames Member
  ketchuplover: null???????????????????? :(
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: What does this bulk of <??>'s mean, <kl>?
Sep-06-08  wrap99: was this a loss on time? it ends on move 40; did Fischer resign? Is the position lost for black?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <it ends on move 40; did Fischer resign? Is the position lost for black?>

Yes and yes. The game was adjourned and Fischer resigned without resuming; White's connected passers are too strong, and Black cannot conjure up perpetual check.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: Position after 7.Nbc3:

click for larger view

From Mednis' "How to Beat Bobby Fischer":

<7...c6? The philosophy of the King's Indian is to accept a somewhat cramped position to be able eventually to strike at White's, the defender hopes, overextended center. Fischer here voluntarily accepts the cramped position, but White's central buildup has been so cautious that he has nothing extended (much less overextended) for Black to later attack. Meanwhile White simply retains and builds on his natural space advantage.

The fundamental disadvantage of White's setup is that it is slow and innocuous and thus Black has an immediate opportunity for central pressure with 7...Nc6! this threatens the combinational 8…exd4 9.Nxd4 Nxe4! And after 8.d5 Ne7 we get the type of position where White's chances are on the queenside and for that he needs his c-pawn on c4 rather than hemmed in on c2 by his knight.

8.a4! Nbd7? The Losing Moment. In the so-called "long variation" of the King's Indian (Black plays Nbd7 and c6 against White's king's bishop fianchetto), Black's play is on the queenside via Qa5 or a5, a4 and Qa5. After White's next move all these possibilities are closed off and White together with his usual central superiority achieves a bind against Black's queenside [...] Black's only correct response, as Tal played under similar circumstances in round 3 [Benko vs Tal, 1962 ], is 8...a5. Black's position is still bad, but he has significantly more breathing room than he gets here.

9.a5! exd4?! Opening the position allows White to accentuate his positives with greater ease. Black should try to keep the position closed as long as possible and play 9...Re8.

[...] 11.h3! Taking away as many squares as possible from Black's pieces. Development of the queen's bishop becomes a special problem. [...] 12...Nfd7 Starting here, I don't have any more recommendation for improving Black's play. He suffers from chronic weakness of his d-pawn and has absolutely no play anywhere.

[...] 25.Kf2! [Benko's] play is outstanding in every respect and the text move is a mark of real grandmaster. Instead of "routine" safe 25.Kh2, White centralizes his king to exert control over the important f3 square. White sees that Black is in no position to start any kind of an attack.

[...] 31.Qxe4 Benko crowns his fine positional play with some sharp tactics. If now 31...Rxd6 32.Qe5 Rd8 33.Rd7+! and Black has a choice of losing his king or queen.>

Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: Does everyone realise what Pal Benko did for Fischer later?!

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <kingscrusher>: Of course, though it should be noted that Benko's chivalrous gesture would have amounted to naught, had any of those who placed below him in the 1969 zonal declined their rights to the spot vacated by Benko.
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <perfidious> I think that you meant to say "had any had any of those who placed below him in the 1969 zonal <not> declined their rights to the spot vacated by Benko." Still, it was a great gesture, and I doubt that either Reshevsky (1st place) or Addison (2nd place) would have made it (certainly not Reshevsky!), and he should be commended for it.

I wonder if Fischer ever thanked him or even acknowledged this gesture?

Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: <kingscrusher: Does everyone realise what Pal Benko did for Fischer later?!>...

You mean what Benko did for chess.

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <AylerKupp>: That may well be, as I just read back what I hen-pecked and realised instantly that it conveyed precisely the opposite of what I intended.

That idiot internal editor, falling asleep at the wheel again! Retribution shall be swift and severe.

Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: Perhaps this opening should be classified as "Benko's Opening" to respect Benko ....'...

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Roomates had a heated argument ?? They had a punch up!
from KIA A00 A04 A07 A08 B10 B40 C00 KIA by fredthebear
Hungarian (A00) 1-0 Heated argument ?? They had a punch up!
from Aooh!? Fredthebear has Uncommon Openings?! by fredthebear
Hungarian? It should be the Benko Opening, dammit...
from Fire Baptisms by Nasruddin Hodja
Rare variations
from Play the King's Indian Defence (Marovic) by Chessdreamer
Hoist With His Own Petard
from Inspirational Games by CKT73
September 2: Hungary for a Win
from Game of the Day 2014 by Phony Benoni
+2 -1 =1 vs. Benko (Curaçao 'minimatch')
from Match Fischer! by dwinco
Op'ning Ben Ko.
from People playing their own opening. by nikolaas
Fianchetto Variation vs Pirc
by kenilworthian
Round 1
from WCC Index [Curacao 1962] by Hesam7
Roomates had a heated argument ?? They had a punch up!
from Black Double Fianchettos In Process by Jersey Joe
I dunno what it is, I just really like this game
from simondt's favorite games by simondt
Roomates had a heated argument ?? They had a punch up!
from Dean Owen is here today! Hip, Hip, Hoorah! by Jersey Joe

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC