chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Efim Geller vs Robert James Fischer
Palma de Mallorca Interzonal (1970), Palma de Mallorca ESP, rd 12, Nov-24
Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Ultra-delayed Exchange Variation (D79)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 25 times; par: 144 [what's this?]

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 9 more Geller/Fischer games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 7 OF 7 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-28-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: <Eggman: <Geller had thought that 67...g3 was impossible: he intended to answer it with 68.fxg3+ followed by 69.Kxf1! One of more than a few fantastic blunders committed by Fischer opponents in the early 1970s.>>

Bobby Fischer:
< "People have been playing against me below their strength for fifteen years." >

Oct-28-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <keypusher>: And Tal was merely thought to have hypnotised opponents on his way to the title....
Oct-28-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <perfidious: <keypusher>: And Tal was merely thought to have hypnotised opponents on his way to the title....>

The funny thing is, we know from the tablebases that it didn't matter -- the game was still drawn after ...g3. The losing move came a bit later.

Of course, probably the biggest reason that Fischer was the beneficiary of all these blunders was simply that he played games out. Most GMs would have accepted the draw here or in the second game in the Taimanov match long before.

Oct-28-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <keypusher>: Indeed; even in those days it was well known that the position you cite remained no more than a draw until Geller blundered.
Oct-28-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <<Wyatt Gwyon> Naw, he was just fortunate that Fischer didn't know the en passant rule.>

Fischer certainly knew the en passant rule. But he thought that it only applied to Communist cheaters, not to him.

Oct-28-13  Conrad93: I know the en passant rule. I don't remember anyone mentioning that it had to be on the fifth or fourth rank.
Oct-28-13  Conrad93: Fischer didn't win because he played it out, he won because his opponent blundered an easy draw.
Oct-28-13  enpassant jadoube: Hello Conrad, long time no see. Nobody knows me like you!
Oct-28-13  PaulLovric: <Conrad93: Fischer didn't win because he played it out, he won because his opponent blundered an easy draw.> i think you are batting in the wrong league here, there are masters negating everything you say about this game, and the rules of chess, not to mention, RJF, arguably the greatest of all GMs, and you keep posting infernal blithering about the most ridiculous things. I am sure you are just learning, and obviously, you are new to chess but for the love of god go and do some research.
Oct-28-13  Wyatt Gwyon: <<Conrad93><I know the en passant rule. >> You might know it now, but you most certainly did not know it on October 25.

<<Conrad93><Fischer didn't win because he played it out, he won because his opponent blundered an easy draw.>>

If you are unfamiliar with the basic rules of chess, please do us all a favor and spare us your assessment of rook endgames (and Paul Morphy).

Oct-28-13  Agent Bouncy: Please do not be too hard on Conrad93. He is very lonely and doesn't have any friends.
Oct-28-13  Conrad93: <Please do not be too hard on Conrad93. He is very lonely and doesn't have any friends.>

This coming from a chess player is highly amusing.

Oct-28-13  Conrad93: 1. All Geller had to do was play 71. Kg6. It is a very obvious move.

2. Paul Morphy was great for his time, but in modern times he would be easily crushed. All-out attacks no longer work in professional circles, and are restricted to patzers and beginners.

Like I said before, his games aren't that interesting. They are too simple minded for my tastes.

I prefer Steinitz, and so far my comments have not been refuted.

But keep going with your insults if it makes you feel nice and safe.

Oct-28-13  PaulLovric: refuted....on so many levels
Oct-28-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: <Conrad93: Fischer didn't win because he played it out, he won because his opponent blundered an easy draw.>

Geller didn’t blunder.
The Russians ordered Geller to throw the game.
They hoped it would make Fischer overconfident during the candidates cycle.

Oct-28-13  PaulLovric: 1ST REFUTATION: <conrad93> your choice or preference for Steinitz is totally your own opinion, but to say that Paul Morphy's, "games aren't that interesting. They are too simple minded for my tastes." is completely IGNORANT. Fischer said Morphy, "was perhaps the greatest genius of all." But I can forgive you, my own rating is about 1000 points lower than Fischer's and i have been playing for over 15 years, and I have a big advantage over you.....I know the rules of the game. What is your chess rating? Do you actually play the game or are you a serial pest?
Oct-28-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: <Conrad93: Fischer didn't win because he played it out, he won because his opponent blundered an easy draw.>

Now thats funny!

Oct-28-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: <Conrad93:
I prefer Steinitz>

In his time,
Steinitz was known as the "en passantinator."

Oct-29-13  Conrad93: Fischer had Morphy fever. It messed with his rationality.
Nov-08-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pawn and Two: Here is a very confusing explanation of the "en passant" rule, published more than a century ago in "The British Chess Code", and retained as late as 1918 in, "The International Chess Code" - London & New York 1918.

http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

Jan-03-14  PJs Studio: Of earn GM's don't seem to fight this hard in endings. Great win against a Super player!
Jan-08-14  PJs Studio: Of earn GM's should read "modern GM's" in my comment above.
Jan-08-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  RookFile: For the most part, Geller defended very well in this game after getting into trouble, before going astray.
Mar-06-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: 71.Rd8 Ra5+ 72.Ke4 g2 (72...Kh3 73.Rh8+ Kg2 74.f5= (Vasyukov)) 73.Rg8 Kh3 74.Kf3 Ra3+ 75.Kf2 Ra2+ 76.Kf3 Kh2 77.f5=

71.Kg6 Ra6+ 72.Kf5 Ra8 73.Rd7 Rf8+ 74.Ke4 Rg8 75.Kf3= (Lilienthal)

Jan-07-17  The Boomerang: "Fischer had Morphy fever. It messed with his rationality."

Lololol...exactly....the same way people have Fischer fever....

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 7)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 7 OF 7 ·  Later Kibitzing>

Now on DVD
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Bobby Fischer's Path To World Champion
by foxmt
Game 92
from Russians versus Fischer by Anatoly21
Neo Grunfeld Defense: Ultra-delayed Exchange Variation
from MKD's Gruenfeld Defense by MKD
--> RR
from 58a_Middlegames w/o NN (Knight-less) by whiteshark
Round 12 (Tuesday, November 24, 1970)
from Interzonal 1970 (Palma de Mallorca) by Phony Benoni
95_Neglected {RR} endgames
by whiteshark
neo grunfiled
by flowerbear
Fischer's good games (wins)
by fref
1970-Nov-24: Palma Interzonal, Round #12
from Bobby Fischer's Road to the World Championship by WeakSquare
He likes sitting down on the job
from What a strange long trip.... We veered Offramp by fredthebear
Essential endgames
by Nodreads
Lengthy and Complex
by Whitehat1963
Fischer's determination breaks Geller's nerves
from Fischer's Finest by morphyvsfischer
14_R+P (2:1) on the same wing - no passed pawn
by whiteshark
Gruenfeld Games
by Zhbugnoimt
Bobby Fischer: My 30 Memorable Games 1968-1972
by Runemaster
White to play and draw; Move # 66
from Chess Endgame Quiz by SamAtoms1980
Geller
from yy_x- - -> HALL OF BLAME by whiteshark
Figaro
from bitko's collection by Jaredfchess
Bobby Fischer's Path To World Champion
by LionHeart40
plus 17 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC