chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Boris Spassky vs Robert James Fischer
Spassky - Fischer World Championship Match (1972), Reykjavik ISL, rd 17, Aug-22
Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack. Dragon Formation (B09)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 55 more Spassky/Fischer games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-26-14  The Rocket: <I think its a safe bet that Spassky didnt "prep" the Pirc, Queen Pawn,
or the English from Fischer.

...or even Nh5 in the Benoni.>

In the openings they DID anticipate, Spassky forgot Gellers preparation on several occassions.

Apr-26-14  The Rocket: The Spassky team did foresee queens pawn openings from Fischer. Spassky replied: "in that case I play the Tartakower, and he(Fischer) has nothing".

Didn't work out that way. Fischer won quite nicely.. But Spassky sported a solid record with the Tartakower variation before the match.

Apr-26-14  ewan14: With an unsound Bb5

Did Geller know the refutation of this at the Fischer Spassky match , or was it later ?

I am sure Geller had told Spassky about Nh5
in the Benoni

All very strange

Aug-24-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Zhbugnoimt: Where did Spassky miss the win?
Aug-24-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Zhbugnoimt: If he had one, which he might not have.
Sep-18-14  RookFile: No wins for Spassky in this game, although he could have played out the endgame to try to make Fischer suffer more.
Oct-19-14  Ke2: Amazing that the rooks just bounce off the solid structure and outposted knight. Qe5 is really strong. I can't figure out why Spassky traded queens, Qf2 seems a better try. Maybe at such a level of play the draw was already trivial.
Mar-11-15  Howard: So did Spassky have a win in the adjourned position ? According to my extensive research, Rybka and Stockfish weren't around back in those days, but then Spassky and the Soviet squadron would have literally all night to analyze the adjourned position.
Mar-21-15  Howard: Attn, AvlerKupp (or anyone else with an engine revved up and ready to go), but I'm beating the drum again, regarding this game!

Did Spassky have any probable win in this game? He was, after all, the exchange up and he definitely blundered into a three-fold repetition.

Mar-24-15  Howard: Still beating the drum..........
Mar-24-15  disasterion: <Howard>: The short answer seems to be, no.

I left Stockfish to ponder the position after 41. Rfc2 (the sealed move), and it finds nothing better for white. 41...g5 is given as +0.23 in white's favour at depth 34.

On a cursory look through the game from 22. Bxf8 onwards, there's never more than half a pawn advantage to white, and no clear winning line that Spassky missed.

Mar-24-15  morfishine: This is all exciting stuff, but Spassky "blew" his preparation in preparing nothing for Fischer's Alekhine defense, not once, but twice

*****

Mar-25-15  RookFile: Fischer had a pawn for the exchange. Then, ask yourself just how scared you are of the isolated e4 pawn. A draw is a perfectly expected outcome.
Jun-03-17  nummerzwei: In his comments, Gligoric stresses the importance of manoeuvring the knight to c6, where it blocks White's rooks from invading via the c-file.

The only way to break through this barrier is to play b4-b5 (e.g. 42.Rb2), but this leads to an exchange of the queenside pawns, and thus a draw.

Jun-29-18  Petrosianic: <Howard>: <Did Spassky have any probable win in this game? He was, after all, the exchange up and he definitely blundered into a three-fold repetition.>

In addition to having a pawn for the exchange, Black had the advantages of a) a solid position with no penetration points for the White Rooks, b) White's weak e4 pawn, and c) Black's very active Rook. All that combined should provide full compensation. To be sure, Spassky could have kept playing, but it's hard to see any promising winning attempts. What winning plan might he try?

Jun-29-18  Howard: You're probably right. But I distinctly recall Lombardy's saying that even though Spassky might not have had a forced win, he certainly could have "made Bobby suffer for a long time".

Spassky, incidentally, was reported to have appeared startled when Fischer "gleefully went to the referee" to claim a draw. In other words, the three-fold was apparently an error on his part.

Jul-06-18  Hobobill30: According to marin (pirc master) timman found 21...Rfc8!N ....because on move 24 Qf4!N "signifagent improvement over the game because after qxf4, 25,rxf4-..g5!? because trying to continue in fashion to the game results in 25...knight d7 ,26 rf2-rc1+ 27Kh2-KNe5- now white has 28 f6! partly spoiling blacks stability" back to ..g5 26 rff3-rc5 27rc3-re5 28 rc7-rxe4 29 rxb7- a5 30ra7-re5 31rc3 with small + saying whites queenside+ activity offers some prospect." although Marin shows a line after timmans 21 thats fine for black. this qoute is from marins pirc defence GM repertoire book
May-20-19  Howard: Personally, I think it's misleading for the website to state that this game is analyzed by Stockfish. If you click on the link, you'll see that it's hardly analyzed at all !!!
May-20-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: ***

That film that Mark relates to (see above) is 'Harry Brown' here is a piece about the chess in the film and a clip of the chess scene mentioning game 7 and the Pirc.

http://streathambrixtonchess.blogsp...

***

May-20-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: Robert Fischer in CRUISE mode here. lol
May-20-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: ***

It is possible the script changed the 'game 17' to game 7 for the flow of the conversation, he says it is match 7 - not game 7. and 'Fischer won' could have meant Fischer won as in winning the title.

That is a lot of 'coulds' maybe it was just a cock up like that villain who was only meant to blow the bloody doors off.

***

May-20-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: <Sally Simpson: ***
It is possible the script changed the 'game 17' to game 7 for the flow of the conversation, he says it is match 7 - not game 7. and 'Fischer won' could have meant Fischer won as in winning the title.

That is a lot of 'coulds' maybe it was just a cock up like that villain who was only meant to blow the bloody doors off.

***>

whatever .

In THIS game Bobby WAS on AUTOPILOT.

lol lol lol

May-20-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: Robert Fischer is the GREATEST Chess player of ALL TIME.

When Bobby goes into CRUISE CONTROL. ... er .... he goes into CRUISE CONTROL . lol

May-20-19  RookFile: <"I was the strongest from 1964 to 1970, but in 1971 Fischer was already stronger." - Boris Spassky>

Humorous. He doesn't let a match loss against Petrosian get in the way.

May-20-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: <RookFile: <"I was the strongest from 1964 to 1970, but in 1971 Fischer was already stronger." - Boris Spassky> Humorous. He doesn't let a match loss against Petrosian get in the way.>

Spassky was as cool a chess champion as you'll get.

It took a Fischer to bring him down.

History does him no justice. And the Soviets and Ruskies like to re write history.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 17
from Fischer World Champion (Timman/Euwe) by Qindarka
Match Fischer!
by dwinco
#17 again,spassky can't win!
from fischer-spassky by kevin86
RR5:RN6
from 47e RR:RN by whiteshark
Game #17
from Fischer-Spassky '72 by foxmt
Round 17
from Fischer - Spassky World Championship Match 1-21 by G Kasparov
Pirc Def: Austrian Attack. Dragon (B09) 1/2-1/2Debated 7th move
from To V or not to V?! by fredthebear
Game 17
from Fischer World Champion (Timman/Euwe) by Qindarka by fredthebear
Spaski-Fischer 17
from Pirc by PhilipTheGeek
World Championship Game #17
from Road to the Championship - Bobby Fischer by nakul1964
98_B70-B74 Sicilian Dragon -Levenfish/Classical
by whiteshark
Pirc
by alabama
World Championship Game #17
from Road to the Championship - Bobby Fischer by FRoeten
PIRC AUSTRIAN ATTACK
from J.MASSANET's favorite games by J.MASSANET
schlick4's favorite games
by schlick4
Games by Fisher
by tkrunner
Bobby Fischer's Path To World Champion
by LionHeart40
Fisher vs. Spassky 1972 Championship
by Pianoplayer
Fischer-Spassky World Championship Match 1972
from Fischer vs The Russians by wanabe2000


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC