Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
David Janowski vs Oscar Chajes
Rice Memorial (1916), New York, NY USA, rd 1, Feb-06
Queen's Gambit Declined: Traditional Variation (D30)  ·  1-0


explore this opening
find similar games 31 more Janowski/O Chajes games
sac: 16.Bxh7+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Help with kibitzing features can be found on our Kibtizing Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sargon: Game has been merged with a duplicate, but unsure which score is correct. Can anyone confirm?
Mar-04-17  clement41: Nice attack!
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: Back to queen sac Mondays
Premium Chessgames Member
  lost in space: I love Mondays!

26. Qh7+ Rxh7 27. Rxh7#

Aug-21-17  stst: Mondy Q-sac:
26.Qh7+ RxQ
Premium Chessgames Member
  agb2002: White has a knight and a pawn for the bishop pair.

Black threatens Bxd7 and Bxc1.

White can deliver mate with 26.Qh7+ Rxh7 27.Rxh7#.

Aug-21-17  AlicesKnight: Black's last move ...Rh8 does not defend against the mate, because after 26.Qh7+ Rxh7, 27.Rxh7 is mate as the N is covered. Taking the R on d7 looks necessary but White's threats leave no time to do this.
Aug-21-17  saturn2: Mate in 2 on h7.
17 Bh7 and 22 Ne4 are nice moves.
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: A ♔ on the rim is doom.


Aug-21-17  leRevenant: A truly Mondayish puzzle. Thank you CG.
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: Solved today's Monday mate-in-two 26. Qh7+ Rxh7 27. Rxh7# at bullet speed.

Much more interesting is the game, especially the interesting demolition combination starting with 17. Bxh7!

Black's decisive mistake is the not-so-obvious 19...Kh7?, which gives White the win after the game move 20. Nd7 +- (+1.87 @ 31 depth, Stockfish 8) or the computer recommendation 20. Ng4 +- (+3.25 @ 31 depth, Stockfish 8.)

Ironically, the mistake (19...Kh7?) from this 1916 game was repeated again in a strong Master game in V Mikenas vs Kashdan, 1931, where a draw was agreed to by White in the position after <19...Kh7?> in this game.

What Black missed in both games is that instead of 19...Kh7? the correct move here is 19...Kh8 ⩲ to = (+0.51 @ 34 depth, Stockfish 8) with drawing chances for Black.

Earlier, instead of 15...Nxc5 16. Bxf6! ⩲ (+0.54 @ 30 depth, Stockfish 8,) Black can keep it fully level with 15...Qxc5 = (0.00 @ 35 depth, Stockfish 8.)

P.S.: Plan to catch the news reports about the solar eclipse on TV today. It's a big event as it's the first total eclipse to pass over the entirety of the USA in a hundred years. I don't have an approved solar filter or viewer to safely view the sun, so I have no intention of looking at the sun (or even the partially obstructed sun) directly.

An article at predicts thousands in North America could lose their vision while trying to view the sun without proper protection. So I plan to stay completely save and watch it on TV or view the shadow on the ground as the moon obstructs the sun in my viewing area.

Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: <26.Qh7+> 26...Rxh7 27.Rh7#


Aug-21-17  stacase: Didn't solve this at <Bullet Speed> I seem to have forgotten that Monday's are sacrificial days for her majesty.
Aug-21-17  The Kings Domain: Nice puzzle, impressive attacking game by Janowski.
Aug-21-17  zb2cr: Saw this one in a flash. It helps that it's a "typical Monday" Queen sacrifice. 26. Qh7+, Rxh7; 27. Rxh7#.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Hi Sargon,

"Game has been merged with a duplicate, but unsure which score is correct. Can anyone confirm?"

Not a duplicate the exact same position was reached one move earlier here...

click for larger view

in V Mikenas vs Kashdan, 1931

with White to play. White agreed to a draw missing the shot 19.Nd7 (which was move 20 in the Janowski game.)

See also:

Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Hi Patzer 2,

"Plan to catch the news reports about the solar eclipse on TV today. It's a big event as it's the first total eclipse to pass over the entirety of the USA in a hundred years."

I went to Italy one year to see a total eclipse of the sun.

It was just about to happen when suddenly it went all dark, like it was night-time and I did not see a thing.

Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <Sally Simpson> The danger of eye damage would be if you're in the part of an area where there's only a partial eclipse of the sun (i.e. the majority of the continental US,) watching even a small part of the sun not hidden by the moon could cause eye damage.

For those within the 70-mile wide area of the total eclipse, the danger would be (1) watching all or part of the sun before the moon completely obstructs it or (2) looking at even a small crescent of the sun after the moon passes over and the sun starts to emerge.

To quote from my MSN/US News link from my previous post <Staring at the sun without eye protection is like burning the back of your retina, the back layer of your eyeball. And you wouldn't even know you're doing it because the retina has no pain fibers. People who stare at the sun without protection would get a blind spot in their vision right away though they wouldn't know until hours later or the next day that the blind spot was still there.

And it doesn't matter how much of the sun you're looking at either. Even a little crescent of sun during a partial eclipse is just as bright as a full sun in that area of your retina, says Van Gelder, clinical spokesperson for the American Academy of Ophthalmology. The only exception to this rule is if you're in the totality of the eclipse, which will be a 70-mile span of the moon's shadow as it progresses across the country between central Oregon and South Carolina.>

Aug-21-17  Cheapo by the Dozen: This was easy even for a Monday.
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Easy mate in two starting with a queen sac.
Aug-21-17  WorstPlayerEver: But 27. h5 is funnier.
Aug-21-17  Strelets: A queen sacrifice crowns a fitting reminder of how much of a force Dawid Janowski was in positions where he was allowed to create tactical complications. Lasker understood this and crushed him +7 -1 =2 in their 1909 match precisely by avoiding these positions.
Premium Chessgames Member <A truly Mondayish puzzle. Thank you CG.> You're welcome. It almost went in the "too easy" bin but why worry when there are still 6 more days?
Aug-21-17  leRevenant: A week is a long time in politics (Harold Wilson) and in chess (leRevenant & CG).
Premium Chessgames Member
  Bubo bubo: 2# with 26.Qh7+ Rxh7 27.Rxh7#
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
A Brilliancy Prize game which is brilliant!
from Bright Side of Chess by Phony Benoni
Game 46 of Chess Highlights of the 20th Century by G. Burgess
from Game collection: GDQ by fredthebear
bengalcat47's favorite games
by bengalcat47
Game 88
from Wonders and Curiosities of Chess (Chernev) by Qindarka
Game 46 of Chess Highlights of the 20th Century by G. Burgess
from yPublished Game by Year & Unconfirmed Source II by fredthebear
25 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection X by wwall
Final, Round 1 (Sunday, February 6)
from New York 1916 (Rice Memorial) by Phony Benoni
Which King Move?
from Great Brilliancy Prize Games of the ChessMasters by Creation Lightship
by Chessdreamer
Transferring pieces changing mates
from Challenger Janowski by Gottschalk
DrChopper's good games
by DrChopper
Game 18
from Brilliancy Prizes (Reinfeld) by Qindarka
Which King Move?
from Great Brilliancy Prize Games of the ChessMasters by SirIvanhoe

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC